240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9849707)
1. Reproducibility and diagnostic sensitivity of ultrasonometry of the phalanges to assess osteoporosis.
Reginster JY; Dethor M; Pirenne H; Dewe W; Albert A
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1998 Oct; 63(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 9849707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ultrasound measurements at the proximal phalanges in healthy women and patients with hip fractures.
Alenfeld FE; Wüster C; Funck C; Pereira-Lima JF; Fritz T; Meeder PJ; Ziegler R
Osteoporos Int; 1998; 8(5):393-8. PubMed ID: 9850344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ultrasound transmission speed and ultrasound bone profile score (UBPS) of the phalanges in normal women and women with osteoporosis.
Soballa T; Wüster C; Schlegel J; Cadossi R; Isani R; Battista S; Heilmann P; Ziegler R
Horm Metab Res; 1998 Aug; 30(8):536-41. PubMed ID: 9761387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantitative ultrasound of the phalanges and DXA of the lumbar spine and proximal femur in evaluating the risk of osteoporotic vertebral fracture in postmenopausal women.
Albanese CV; De Terlizzi F; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 2011 Feb; 116(1):92-101. PubMed ID: 20927655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can radial bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound measurements reduce the number of women who need axial density skeletal assessment?
Damilakis J; Papadokostakis G; Perisinakis K; Hadjipavlou A; Gourtsoyiannis N
Osteoporos Int; 2003 Aug; 14(8):688-93. PubMed ID: 12897977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Panoramic-based mandibular indices in relation to mandibular bone mineral density and skeletal status assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and quantitative ultrasound.
Drozdzowska B; Pluskiewicz W; Tarnawska B
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Nov; 31(6):361-7. PubMed ID: 12424634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative ultrasound at the phalanxes discriminates osteoporotic women with vertebral but not with hip fracture.
Gnudi S; Ripamonti C
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Mar; 30(3):357-61. PubMed ID: 15063517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparisons of noninvasive bone mineral measurements in assessing age-related loss, fracture discrimination, and diagnostic classification.
Grampp S; Genant HK; Mathur A; Lang P; Jergas M; Takada M; Glüer CC; Lu Y; Chavez M
J Bone Miner Res; 1997 May; 12(5):697-711. PubMed ID: 9144335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of quantitative ultrasound of the phalanges with conventional bone densitometry in healthy postmenopausal women.
Alexandersen P; de Terlizzi F; Tankó LB; Bagger YZ; Christiansen C
Osteoporos Int; 2005 Sep; 16(9):1071-8. PubMed ID: 15719153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance of five phalangeal QUS parameters in the evaluation of gonadal-status, age and vertebral fracture risk compared with DXA.
Albanese CV; Cepollaro C; de Terlizzi F; Brandi ML; Passariello R
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Apr; 35(4):537-44. PubMed ID: 19097682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Phalangeal quantitative ultrasound technology and dual energy X-ray densitometry in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism: influence of sex and menopausal status.
Camozzi V; Lumachi F; Mantero F; Piccolo M; Luisetto G
Osteoporos Int; 2003 Jul; 14(7):602-8. PubMed ID: 12730752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ultrasound velocity through the cortex of phalanges, radius, and tibia in normal and osteoporotic postmenopausal women using a new multisite quantitative ultrasound device.
Damilakis J; Papadokostakis G; Vrahoriti H; Tsagaraki I; Perisinakis K; Hadjipavlou A; Gourtsoyiannis N
Invest Radiol; 2003 Apr; 38(4):207-11. PubMed ID: 12649644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Identifying postmenopausal women with osteoporosis by calcaneal ultrasound, metacarpal digital X-ray radiogrammetry and phalangeal radiographic absorptiometry: a comparative study.
Boonen S; Nijs J; Borghs H; Peeters H; Vanderschueren D; Luyten FP
Osteoporos Int; 2005 Jan; 16(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 15197540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of a new quantitative ultrasound calcaneus measurement: precision and discrimination of hip fractures in elderly women compared with dual X-ray absorptiometry.
He YQ; Fan B; Hans D; Li J; Wu CY; Njeh CF; Zhao S; Lu Y; Tsuda-Futami E; Fuerst T; Genant HK
Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(4):354-60. PubMed ID: 10928226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How well do radiographic absorptiometry and quantitative ultrasound predict osteoporosis at spine or hip? A cost-effectiveness analysis.
Lippuner K; Fuchs G; Ruetsche AG; Perrelet R; Casez JP; Neto I
J Clin Densitom; 2000; 3(3):241-9. PubMed ID: 11090231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does the combination of quantitative ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry improve fracture discrimination?
Frost ML; Blake GM; Fogelman I
Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(6):471-7. PubMed ID: 11446563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative ultrasound of the proximal phalanges and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in Crohn's disease patients with osteopenia.
von Tirpitz C; Klaus J; Steinkamp M; Mason R; Kratzer W; Adler G; Rieber A; Reinshagen M
J Gastroenterol; 2003; 38(3):238-43. PubMed ID: 12673446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Discrimination of hip fractures by quantitative ultrasound of the phalanges and the calcaneus and dual X-ray absorptiometry.
Damilakis J; Papadokostakis G; Perisinakis K; Maris T; Dimitriou P; Hadjipavlou A; Gourtsoyiannis N
Eur J Radiol; 2004 Jun; 50(3):268-72. PubMed ID: 15145486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Palangeal quantitative ultrasound, phalangeal morphometric variables, and vertebral fracture discrimination.
Guglielmi G; Njeh CF; de Terlizzi F; De Serio DA; Scillitani A; Cammisa M; Fan B; Lu Y; Genant HK
Calcif Tissue Int; 2003 Apr; 72(4):469-77. PubMed ID: 12574870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reference curve and diagnostic sensitivity for a new ultrasound device for the phalanges [correction of phalanages], the DBMsonic 1200, in Belgian women.
Joly J; Westhovens R; Borghs H; Peeters H; Tirry J; Nijs J; Dequeker J
Osteoporos Int; 1999; 9(4):284-9. PubMed ID: 10550444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]