240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9849707)
21. A comparative study of computed digital absorptiometry and conventional dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in postmenopausal women.
Fiter J; Nolla JM; Gómez-Vaquero C; Martínez-Aguilá D; Valverde J; Roig-Escofet D
Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(7):565-9. PubMed ID: 11527054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Quantitative ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the prediction of fragility fracture in men.
Gonnelli S; Cepollaro C; Gennari L; Montagnani A; Caffarelli C; Merlotti D; Rossi S; Cadirni A; Nuti R
Osteoporos Int; 2005 Aug; 16(8):963-8. PubMed ID: 15599495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Stiffness in discrimination of patients with vertebral fractures.
Mikhail MB; Flaster E; Aloia JF
Osteoporos Int; 1999; 9(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 10367026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prediction of hip osteoporosis by DXA using a novel pulse-echo ultrasound device.
Schousboe JT; Riekkinen O; Karjalainen J
Osteoporos Int; 2017 Jan; 28(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 27492435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Discriminatory ability of magnetic resonance T2* measurements in a sample of postmenopausal women with low-energy fractures: a comparison with phalangeal speed of sound and dual x-ray absorptiometry.
Damilakis J; Maris T; Papadokostakis G; Sideri L; Gourtsoyiannis N
Invest Radiol; 2004 Nov; 39(11):706-12. PubMed ID: 15486532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Calcaneus ultrasonometry and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the evaluation of vertebral fracture risk.
Frediani B; Acciai C; Falsetti P; Baldi F; Filippou G; Siagkri C; Spreafico A; Galeazzi M; Marcolongo R
Calcif Tissue Int; 2006 Oct; 79(4):223-9. PubMed ID: 16969597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Quantitative bone ultrasound at phalanges and calcaneus in osteoporotic postmenopausal women: influence of age and measurement site.
Camozzi V; De Terlizzi F; Zangari M; Luisetto G
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 33(7):1039-45. PubMed ID: 17445968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Hand ultrasound for osteoporosis screening in postmenopausal women.
Benitez CL; Schneider DL; Barrett-Connor E; Sartoris DJ
Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 10824235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Quantitative ultrasound of the tibia depends on both cortical density and thickness.
Prevrhal S; Fuerst T; Fan B; Njeh C; Hans D; Uffmann M; Srivastav S; Genant HK
Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 11305080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of six calcaneal quantitative ultrasound devices: precision and hip fracture discrimination.
Njeh CF; Hans D; Li J; Fan B; Fuerst T; He YQ; Tsuda-Futami E; Lu Y; Wu CY; Genant HK
Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(12):1051-62. PubMed ID: 11256897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Contact quantitative ultrasound: an evaluation of precision, fracture discrimination, age-related bone loss and applicability of the WHO criteria.
Frost ML; Blake GM; Fogelman I
Osteoporos Int; 1999; 10(6):441-9. PubMed ID: 10663343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The relationship between phalangeal bone density and vertebral deformities.
Versluis RG; Petri H; Vismans FJ; van de Ven CM; Springer MP; Papapoulos SE
Calcif Tissue Int; 2000 Jan; 66(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 10602836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Quantitative computed tomography of the lumbar spine, not dual x-ray absorptiometry, is an independent predictor of prevalent vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteopenia receiving long-term glucocorticoid and hormone-replacement therapy.
Rehman Q; Lang T; Modin G; Lane NE
Arthritis Rheum; 2002 May; 46(5):1292-7. PubMed ID: 12115236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Can the WHO definition of osteoporosis be applied to multi-site axial transmission quantitative ultrasound?
Knapp KM; Blake GM; Spector TD; Fogelman I
Osteoporos Int; 2004 May; 15(5):367-74. PubMed ID: 14685652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Ability of ultrasound bone profile score (UBPS) to discriminate between fractured and not fractured osteoporotic women.
Di Stefano M; Isaia GC
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2002; 28(11-12):1485-9. PubMed ID: 12498944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The usefulness of quantitative ultrasound at the hand phalanges in the detection of the different types of nontraumatic fractures.
Drozdzowska B; Pluskiewicz W; de Terlizzi F
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2003 Nov; 29(11):1545-50. PubMed ID: 14654150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A comparison of the longitudinal changes in quantitative ultrasound with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: the four-year effects of hormone replacement therapy.
Sahota O; San P; Cawte SA; Pearson D; Hosking DJ
Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 10663359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Does quantitative ultrasound imaging enhance precision and discrimination?
Frost ML; Blake GM; Fogelman I
Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(5):425-33. PubMed ID: 10912845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The relationship between bone mineral density and ultrasound in postmenopausal and osteoporotic women.
Yeap SS; Pearson D; Cawte SA; Hosking DJ
Osteoporos Int; 1998; 8(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 9666937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of phalangeal ultrasound and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in healthy male and female adolescents.
Halaba ZP; Konstantynowicz J; Pluskiewicz W; Kaczmarski M; Piotrowska-Jastrzebska J
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Dec; 31(12):1617-22. PubMed ID: 16344124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
