These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9850556)

  • 1. Restoration of small proximal dentin lesions with the tunnel technique. A 3-year clinical study performed in Public Dental Service clinics.
    Holst A; Brännström M
    Swed Dent J; 1998; 22(4):143-8. PubMed ID: 9850556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A 3-year clinical evaluation of Ketac-Silver restorations in primary molars.
    Holst A
    Swed Dent J; 1996; 20(6):209-14. PubMed ID: 9065982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical evaluation of glass-ionomer tunnel restorations in primary molars: 36 months results.
    Markovic D; Peric T
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Mar; 53(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 18304240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tunnel restorations. A 3 1/2-year follow up study of Class I and II tunnel restorations in permanent and primary teeth.
    Hasselrot L
    Swed Dent J; 1993; 17(5):173-82. PubMed ID: 8291027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tunnel restorations placed in routine practice and observed for 24 to 54 months.
    Strand GV; Nordbø H; Leirskar J; von der Fehr FR; Eide GE
    Quintessence Int; 2000; 31(7):453-60. PubMed ID: 11203966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The theory and practice of internal 'tunnel' restorations: a review of the literature and observations on clinical performance over eight years in practice.
    Jones SE
    Prim Dent Care; 1999 Jul; 6(3):93-100. PubMed ID: 11819878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Glass ionomer-silver cermet Class II tunnel-restorations for primary molars.
    Croll TP
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1988; 55(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 2968382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Treatment of proximal caries lesions by tunnel restorations.
    Wiegand A; Attin T
    Dent Mater; 2007 Dec; 23(12):1461-7. PubMed ID: 17320944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tunnel restorations in permanent teeth. A 7 year follow up study.
    Hasselrot L
    Swed Dent J; 1998; 22(1-2):1-7. PubMed ID: 9646387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficacy of tunnel restorations in the removal of caries.
    Papa J; Cain C; Messer HH
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Oct; 24(10):715-9. PubMed ID: 8121986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical evaluation of a resin composite and bonding agent in Class I and II restorations: 2-year results.
    Lundin SA; Rasmusson CG
    Quintessence Int; 2004 Oct; 35(9):758-62. PubMed ID: 15471000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of factors affecting failure of glass cermet tunnel restorations in a multi-center study.
    Pilebro CE; van Dijken JW
    Clin Oral Investig; 2001 Jun; 5(2):96-101. PubMed ID: 11480816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cervical compomer restorations: the role of cavity etching in a 48-month clinical evaluation.
    Di Lenarda R; Cadenaro M; De Stefano Dorigo E
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):382-7. PubMed ID: 11203846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. One year clinical evaluation of two different types of composite resins in posterior teeth.
    Gianordoli Neto R; Santiago SL; Mendonça JS; Passos VF; Lauris JR; Navarro MF
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 May; 9(4):26-33. PubMed ID: 18473024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Saucer-shaped cavity preparations for posterior approximal resin composite restorations: observations up to 10 years.
    Nordbø H; Leirskar J; von der Fehr FR
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Jan; 29(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 9611469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Durability of extensive Class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement after 6 years.
    Andersson-Wenckert IE; van Dijken JW; Kieri C
    Am J Dent; 2004 Feb; 17(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 15241909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 3-year evaluation of a new open sandwich technique in Class II cavities.
    Lindberg A; van Dijken JW; Lindberg M
    Am J Dent; 2003 Feb; 16(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 12744410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract) in class III cavities: three-year results.
    Demirci M; Ersev H; Uçok M
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 12022451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 4-year clinical performance and survival analysis of Class I and II compomer restorations in permanent teeth.
    Huth KC; Manhart J; Selbertinger A; Paschos E; Kaaden C; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R
    Am J Dent; 2004 Feb; 17(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 15241910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Split mouth randomized controlled clinical trial of beveled cavity preparations in primary molars: an 18-Month follow up.
    Oliveira CA; Dias PF; Dos Santos MP; Maia LC
    J Dent; 2008 Sep; 36(9):754-8. PubMed ID: 18579283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.