2720 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9850674)
1. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
Lynge E
APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mammography screening in the county of Fyn. November 1993-December 1999.
Njor SH; Olsen AH; Bellstrøm T; Dyreborg U; Bak M; Axelsson C; Graversen HP; Schwartz W; Lynge E
APMIS Suppl; 2003; (110):1-33. PubMed ID: 12739252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Results of intermediate measures from a population-based, randomized trial of mammographic screening prevalence and detection of breast carcinoma among Asian women: the Singapore Breast Screening Project.
Ng EH; Ng FC; Tan PH; Low SC; Chiang G; Tan KP; Seow A; Emmanuel S; Tan CH; Ho GH; Ng LT; Wilde CC
Cancer; 1998 Apr; 82(8):1521-8. PubMed ID: 9554530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Participation behaviour following a false positive test in the Copenhagen mammography screening programme.
Andersen SB; Vejborg I; von Euler-Chelpin M
Acta Oncol; 2008; 47(4):550-5. PubMed ID: 18465321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Seventeen-years overview of breast cancer inside and outside screening in Denmark.
Domingo L; Jacobsen KK; von Euler-Chelpin M; Vejborg I; Schwartz W; Sala M; Lynge E
Acta Oncol; 2013 Jan; 52(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 22943386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pattern of participation in a cohort aged 50-60 years at first invitation to the service-screening programme with mammography in Stockholm county, Sweden.
Törnberg S; Kemetli L; Svane G; Rosén M; Stenbeck M; Nyström L
Prev Med; 2005; 41(3-4):728-33. PubMed ID: 16137757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Balancing sensitivity and specificity: sixteen year's of experience from the mammography screening programme in Copenhagen, Denmark.
Utzon-Frank N; Vejborg I; von Euler-Chelpin M; Lynge E
Cancer Epidemiol; 2011 Oct; 35(5):393-8. PubMed ID: 21239242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Breast cancer incidence after the introduction of mammography screening: what should be expected?
Svendsen AL; Olsen AH; von Euler-Chelpin M; Lynge E
Cancer; 2006 May; 106(9):1883-90. PubMed ID: 16572411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prophylactic Oophorectomy: Reducing the U.S. Death Rate from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. A Continuing Debate.
Piver MS
Oncologist; 1996; 1(5):326-330. PubMed ID: 10388011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Incidence of invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ in a screening program by age: should older women continue screening?
Erbas B; Amos A; Fletcher A; Kavanagh AM; Gertig DM
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2004 Oct; 13(10):1569-73. PubMed ID: 15466971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Age-specific interval breast cancers in New South Wales and meta-analysis of studies of women aged 40-49 years.
Taylor R; Page A; Bampton D; Estoesta J; Rickard M
J Med Screen; 2004; 11(4):199-206. PubMed ID: 15563775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Nationwide breast cancer screening fully accomplished; results from the implementation phase 1990-1997. National Evaluation Team for Breast Cancer Screening].
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Jun; 144(23):1124-9. PubMed ID: 10876708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Contributions of the epidemiological cancer registries to the evaluation of mammography screening in Germany].
Urbschat I; Kieschke J; Schlanstedt-Jahn U; von Gehlen S; Thiel A; Jensch P
Gesundheitswesen; 2005 Jul; 67(7):448-54. PubMed ID: 16103967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Overdiagnosis, sojourn time, and sensitivity in the Copenhagen mammography screening program.
Olsen AH; Agbaje OF; Myles JP; Lynge E; Duffy SW
Breast J; 2006; 12(4):338-42. PubMed ID: 16848843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Mammography screening in the county of Copenhagen. Results of the first three screening rounds].
Tange UB; Hirsch FR; Jensen MB; Olsen AH; Blichert-Toft M; Rank FE; Vejborg IM; Mouridsen H; Lynge E
Ugeskr Laeger; 2002 Feb; 164(8):1048-52. PubMed ID: 11894707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Service screening with mammography in Northern Sweden: effects on breast cancer mortality - an update.
Jonsson H; Bordás P; Wallin H; Nyström L; Lenner P
J Med Screen; 2007; 14(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 17626708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differences between first and subsequent rounds of the MRISC breast cancer screening program for women with a familial or genetic predisposition.
Kriege M; Brekelmans CT; Boetes C; Muller SH; Zonderland HM; Obdeijn IM; Manoliu RA; Kok T; Rutgers EJ; de Koning HJ; Klijn JG;
Cancer; 2006 Jun; 106(11):2318-26. PubMed ID: 16615112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Urban-rural differences in the management of screen-detected invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ in victoria.
Kok DL; Chang JH; Erbas B; Fletcher A; Kavanagh AM; Henderson MA; Gertig DM
ANZ J Surg; 2006 Nov; 76(11):996-1001. PubMed ID: 17054549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minority report - false negative breast assessment in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography: imaging and pathological features, and associated delay in diagnosis.
Ciatto S; Houssami N; Ambrogetti D; Bonardi R; Collini G; Del Turco MR
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Sep; 105(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 17115112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical outcomes of the Otago-Southland Breast Cancer Screening Programme 1991-1996.
Doyle TC; Elwood JM; Smale P; Berkeley BB; Blennerhassett JB; Miller AP; Chartres SM; Hunter MH; Packer SG; Pfeifer M
N Z Med J; 1998 Oct; 111(1075):380-3. PubMed ID: 9830418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
