These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9851043)

  • 1. Importance of pre-enrichment media for isolation of Salmonella spp. from swine and poultry.
    Hoorfar J; Baggesen DL
    FEMS Microbiol Lett; 1998 Dec; 169(1):125-30. PubMed ID: 9851043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improved culture methods for isolation of Salmonella organisms from swine feces.
    Hoorfar J; Mortensen AV
    Am J Vet Res; 2000 Nov; 61(11):1426-9. PubMed ID: 11108192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of methods for isolating Salmonella bacteria from faeces of naturally infected pigs.
    Davies PR; Turkson PK; Funk JA; Nichols MA; Ladely SR; Fedorka-Cray PJ
    J Appl Microbiol; 2000 Jul; 89(1):169-77. PubMed ID: 10945794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Addition of Novobiocin in pre-enrichment step can improve Salmonella culture protocol of modified semisolid Rappaport-Vassiliadis.
    Jensen AN; Sørensen G; Baggesen DL; Bødker R; Hoorfar J
    J Microbiol Methods; 2003 Oct; 55(1):249-55. PubMed ID: 14500016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of an immunochromatography strip assay for the detection of Salmonella sp. from poultry.
    Bautista DA; Elankumaran S; Arking JA; Heckert RA
    J Vet Diagn Invest; 2002 Sep; 14(5):427-30. PubMed ID: 12296399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of pre-enrichment protocol on the sensitivity and specificity of PCR for detection of naturally contaminated Salmonella in raw poultry compared to conventional culture.
    Myint MS; Johnson YJ; Tablante NL; Heckert RA
    Food Microbiol; 2006 Sep; 23(6):599-604. PubMed ID: 16943057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Selective pre-enrichment method to lessen time needed to recover Salmonella from commercial poultry processing samples.
    Rasamsetti S; Berrang M; Cox NA; Shariat NW
    Food Microbiol; 2021 Oct; 99():103818. PubMed ID: 34119103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of two methods for isolation of Salmonella from poultry litter samples.
    Read SC; Irwin RJ; Poppe C; Harris J
    Poult Sci; 1994 Oct; 73(10):1617-21. PubMed ID: 7816738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative studies of diagnostic bacteriological methods for the recovery of Salmonella from faecal samples from flocks of layers.
    Braun C; Kostka V; Balks E; Redmann T; Helmuth R
    Zentralbl Veterinarmed B; 1998 May; 45(4):245-50. PubMed ID: 9640105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of EF-18 agar and modified brilliant green agar with lutensit for isolation of Salmonella from poultry samples.
    Petersen L
    Acta Vet Scand; 1997; 38(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 9129349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detection of salmonellae in chicken feces by a combination of tetrathionate broth enrichment, capillary PCR, and capillary gel electrophoresis.
    Carli KT; Unal CB; Caner V; Eyigor A
    J Clin Microbiol; 2001 May; 39(5):1871-6. PubMed ID: 11326006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimation of the diagnostic accuracy of the invA-gene-based PCR technique and a bacteriological culture for the detection of Salmonella spp. in caecal content from slaughtered pigs using Bayesian analysis.
    Mainar-Jaime RC; Atashparvar N; Chirino-Trejo M
    Zoonoses Public Health; 2008; 55(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 18234030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of 2 culture methods and PCR assays for Salmonella detection in poultry feces.
    Soria MC; Soria MA; Bueno DJ
    Poult Sci; 2012 Mar; 91(3):616-26. PubMed ID: 22334736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of culture, ELISA and PCR techniques for salmonella detection in faecal samples for cattle, pig and poultry.
    Eriksson E; Aspan A
    BMC Vet Res; 2007 Sep; 3():21. PubMed ID: 17888169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development of a qPCR for the detection and quantification of
    Parker AM; Mohler VL; Gunn AA; House JK
    J Vet Diagn Invest; 2020 Nov; 32(6):835-843. PubMed ID: 32856555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improved diagnostic and real-time pcr in rapid screening for Salmonella in the poultry food chain.
    Szmolka A; Kaszanyitzky E; Nagy B
    Acta Vet Hung; 2006 Sep; 54(3):297-312. PubMed ID: 17020134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of cultivation and PCR-hybridization for detection of Salmonella in porcine fecal and water samples.
    Feder I; Nietfeld JC; Galland J; Yeary T; Sargeant JM; Oberst R; Tamplin ML; Luchansky JB
    J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Jul; 39(7):2477-84. PubMed ID: 11427557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of classical isolation protocols with a 24 h screen to detect viable salmonellas in faeces.
    Cherrington CA; Huis in't Veld JH
    J Appl Bacteriol; 1993 Jul; 75(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 8365957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of enrichment incubation time on the isolation of Salmonella.
    Waltman WD; Horne AM; Pirkle C
    Avian Dis; 1993; 37(3):884-7. PubMed ID: 8257386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of DNA isolation methods and detection of Salmonella spp. from animal faeces and dust using invA real-time PCR.
    Braun SD; Methner U
    Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2011; 124(5-6):177-85. PubMed ID: 22059286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.