These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9851345)
1. Soft tissue evaluation of contemporary Caucasian and African American female facial profiles. Sutter RE; Turley PK Angle Orthod; 1998 Dec; 68(6):487-96. PubMed ID: 9851345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Changes in the Caucasian male facial profile as depicted in fashion magazines during the twentieth century. Nguyen DD; Turley PK Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Aug; 114(2):208-17. PubMed ID: 9714286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Changes in the African American female profile as depicted in fashion magazines during the 20th century. Yehezkel S; Turley PK Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Apr; 125(4):407-17. PubMed ID: 15067255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A 3D analysis of Caucasian and African American facial morphologies in a US population. Talbert L; Kau CH; Christou T; Vlachos C; Souccar N J Orthod; 2014 Mar; 41(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 24671286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Esthetic preferences of European American, Hispanic American, Japanese, and African judges for soft-tissue profiles. Nomura M; Motegi E; Hatch JP; Gakunga PT; Ng'ang'a PM; Rugh JD; Yamaguchi H Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Apr; 135(4 Suppl):S87-95. PubMed ID: 19362272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bimaxillary protrusion in black Americans--an esthetic evaluation and the treatment considerations. Farrow AL; Zarrinnia K; Azizi K Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Sep; 104(3):240-50. PubMed ID: 8362785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The perception of optimal profile in African Americans versus white Americans as assessed by orthodontists and the lay public. Hall D; Taylor RW; Jacobson A; Sadowsky PL; Bartolucci A Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Nov; 118(5):514-25. PubMed ID: 11094365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Photos vs silhouettes for evaluation of African American profile esthetics. Hockley A; Weinstein M; Borislow AJ; Braitman LE Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Feb; 141(2):161-8. PubMed ID: 22284283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The female soft tissue profile as presented in fashion magazines during the 1900s: a photographic analysis. Auger TA; Turley PK Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1999; 14(1):7-18. PubMed ID: 10337246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Soft tissue profile analysis in a sample of South African Blacks with bimaxillary protrusion. Beukes S; Dawjee SM; Hlongwa P SADJ; 2007 Jun; 62(5):206, 208-10, 212. PubMed ID: 17886588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computer analysis of the African-American face. Jeffries JM; DiBernardo B; Rauscher GE Ann Plast Surg; 1995 Mar; 34(3):318-21; discussion 321-2. PubMed ID: 7598391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factors associated with the beauty of soft-tissue profile. Ghorbanyjavadpour F; Rakhshan V Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Jun; 155(6):832-843. PubMed ID: 31153504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Soft tissue profile: a survey of African-American preference. Polk MS; Farman AG; Yancey JA; Gholston LR; Johnson BE; Regennitter FJ Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Jul; 108(1):90-101. PubMed ID: 7598111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A cephalometric evaluation of American Negro women. Fonseca RJ; Klein WD Am J Orthod; 1978 Feb; 73(2):152-60. PubMed ID: 272851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contribution of lip proportions to facial aesthetics in different ethnicities: a three-dimensional analysis. Wong WW; Davis DG; Camp MC; Gupta SC J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2010 Dec; 63(12):2032-9. PubMed ID: 20133215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Soft tissue profile in white Brazilian adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces. Scavone H; Zahn-Silva W; do Valle-Corotti KM; Nahás AC Angle Orthod; 2008 Jan; 78(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 18193966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Facial profile esthetic preferences: perception in two Brazilian states. Oliveira MD; Silveira BL; Mattos CT; Marquezan M Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(3):88-95. PubMed ID: 26154461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Differences between Caucasian and Asian attractive faces. Rhee SC Skin Res Technol; 2018 Feb; 24(1):73-79. PubMed ID: 28722243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-dimensional analysis of facial morphology. Liu Y; Kau CH; Talbert L; Pan F J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 25(5):1890-4. PubMed ID: 25072972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]