These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9851350)

  • 1. An assessment of extraction versus nonextraction orthodontic treatment using the peer assessment rating (PAR) index.
    Holman JK; Hans MG; Nelson S; Powers MP
    Angle Orthod; 1998 Dec; 68(6):527-34. PubMed ID: 9851350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Class II treatment efficiency in maxillary premolar extraction and nonextraction protocols.
    Janson G; Barros SE; de Freitas MR; Henriques JF; Pinzan A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):490-8. PubMed ID: 17920502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Orthodontic outcomes assessment using the peer assessment rating index.
    Dyken RA; Sadowsky PL; Hurst D
    Angle Orthod; 2001 Jun; 71(3):164-9. PubMed ID: 11407767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Efficacy of orthodontic treatment according to the Peer Assessment Rating index].
    Piskorski D
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2003; 49():335-51. PubMed ID: 15552857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relapse of anterior crowding in patients treated with extraction and nonextraction of premolars.
    Erdinc AE; Nanda RS; Işiksal E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jun; 129(6):775-84. PubMed ID: 16769496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of the quality of the finished occlusion on postretention occlusal relapse.
    de Freitas KM; Janson G; de Freitas MR; Pinzan A; Henriques JF; Pinzan-Vercelino CR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):428.e9-14. PubMed ID: 17920494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of treatment and posttreatment changes of protraction facemask treatment using the PAR index.
    Ngan P; Yiu C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Oct; 118(4):414-20. PubMed ID: 11029737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [PAR index of adolescents with congenital missing teeth pre- and post-orthodontic treatment].
    Zhang XG; Huang N; Chen YX; He QC
    Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2008 May; 39(3):478-80. PubMed ID: 18575347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Extraction of maxillary first permanent molars in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Stalpers MJ; Booij JW; Bronkhorst EM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Katsaros C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):316-23. PubMed ID: 17826599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Treatment stability in patients with Class II malocclusion treated with 2 maxillary premolar extractions or without extractions.
    Janson G; Camardella LT; Araki JD; de Freitas MR; Pinzan A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jul; 138(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 20620829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cephalometric comparison of maxillary second molar extraction and nonextraction treatments in patients with Class II malocclusions.
    Waters D; Harris EF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Dec; 120(6):608-13; quiz 677. PubMed ID: 11742305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of orthodontic treatment outcomes in nonextraction, 2 maxillary premolar extraction, and 4 premolar extraction protocols with the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system.
    Akinci Cansunar H; Uysal T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 May; 145(5):595-602. PubMed ID: 24785923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Duration of treatment and occlusal outcome using Damon3 self-ligated and conventional orthodontic bracket systems in extraction patients: a prospective randomized clinical trial.
    DiBiase AT; Nasr IH; Scott P; Cobourne MT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Feb; 139(2):e111-6. PubMed ID: 21300221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of peer assessment ratings (PAR) from 1-phase and 2-phase treatment protocols for Class II malocclusions.
    King GJ; McGorray SP; Wheeler TT; Dolce C; Taylor M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 May; 123(5):489-96. PubMed ID: 12750665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Occlusal and cephalometric Class II Division 1 malocclusion severity in patients treated with and without extraction of 2 maxillary premolars.
    Janson G; Graciano JT; Henriques JF; de Freitas MR; Pinzan A; Pinzan-Vercelino CR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jun; 129(6):759-67. PubMed ID: 16769494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Treatment outcomes in 3 modes of orthodontic practice.
    Poulton DR; Baumrind S; Vlaskalic V
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Feb; 121(2):176-84. PubMed ID: 11840132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Profile changes of patients treated with and without premolar extractions.
    Erdinc AE; Nanda RS; Dandajena TC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):324-31. PubMed ID: 17826600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Treatment results in dental school orthodontic patients in 1983 and 1993.
    Firestone AR; Häsler RU; Ingervall B
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 10022180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Malocclusion severity in Asian men in relation to malocclusion type and orthodontic treatment need.
    Soh J; Sandham A; Chan YH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Nov; 128(5):648-52. PubMed ID: 16286213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Alignment stability in Class II malocclusion treated with 2- and 4-premolar extraction protocols.
    Janson G; Busato MC; Henriques JF; de Freitas MR; de Freitas LM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Aug; 130(2):189-95. PubMed ID: 16905063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.