BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9854929)

  • 1. Amalgam vs. composite resin: 1998.
    Christensen GJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1998 Dec; 129(12):1757-9. PubMed ID: 9854929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The future of dental amalgam].
    Opdam NJ
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2005 Oct; 112(10):373-5. PubMed ID: 16300323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Black or white--Which choice for the molars? Part 2. Which does one choose for the restoration of posterior teeth: amalgam or composite?].
    De Moor R; Delmé K
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2008; 63(4):135-46. PubMed ID: 19227687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Factors relating to usage patterns of amalgam and resin composite for posterior restorations--a prospective analysis.
    Khalaf ME; Alomari QD; Omar R
    J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):785-92. PubMed ID: 24769386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Amalgam and composite posterior restorations: curriculum versus practice in operative dentistry at a US dental school.
    Ottenga ME; Mjör I
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):524-8. PubMed ID: 17910231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minimally invasive management of dental caries: contemporary teaching of posterior resin-based composite placement in U.S. and Canadian dental schools.
    Lynch CD; Frazier KB; McConnell RJ; Blum IR; Wilson NH
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2011 Jun; 142(6):612-20. PubMed ID: 21628682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The amalgam-free dental school.
    Roeters FJ; Opdam NJ; Loomans BA
    J Dent; 2004 Jul; 32(5):371-7. PubMed ID: 15193785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Resin Composite Versus Amalgam Restorations Placed in United States Dental Schools.
    Alreshaid L; El-Badrawy W; Kulkarni G; Santos MJ; Prakki A
    Oper Dent; 2023 Jan; 48(1):21-32. PubMed ID: 36472481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Early failure of Class II resin composite versus Class II amalgam restorations placed by dental students.
    Overton JD; Sullivan DJ
    J Dent Educ; 2012 Mar; 76(3):338-40. PubMed ID: 22383602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Teaching of direct posterior resin composite restorations in UK dental therapy training programmes.
    Lynch CD; Wilson NH
    Br Dent J; 2010 May; 208(9):415-21. PubMed ID: 20448613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Curriculum time compared to clinical procedures in amalgam and composite posterior restorations in U.S. dental schools: a preliminary study.
    Rey R; Nimmo S; Childs GS; Behar-Horenstein LS
    J Dent Educ; 2015 Mar; 79(3):331-6. PubMed ID: 25729027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Twelve-year survival of 2-surface composite resin and amalgam premolar restorations placed by dental students.
    Naghipur S; Pesun I; Nowakowski A; Kim A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):336-9. PubMed ID: 27086110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Class I and Class II silver amalgam and resin composite posterior restorations: teaching approaches in Canadian faculties of dentistry.
    McComb D
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2005 Jun; 71(6):405-6. PubMed ID: 15955263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Next generation of dentists moving to amalgam-free dentistry: Survey of posterior restorations teaching in North America.
    Zabrovsky A; Neeman Levy T; Bar-On H; Beyth N; Ben-Gal G
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2019 Aug; 23(3):355-363. PubMed ID: 31009156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Has resin-based composite replaced amalgam?
    Christensen GJ; Child PL
    Dent Today; 2010 Feb; 29(2):108, 110. PubMed ID: 20196340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Trends in material choice for posterior restorations in an Israeli dental school: composite resin versus amalgam.
    Ben-Gal G; Weiss EI
    J Dent Educ; 2011 Dec; 75(12):1590-5. PubMed ID: 22184598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Marginal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in Class II conservative preparations.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2001 May; 32(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 11444073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Remaining challenges with Class II resin-based composite restorations.
    Christensen GJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2007 Nov; 138(11):1487-9. PubMed ID: 17974646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do restorations made of amalgam outlast those made of resin-based composite?
    Leinfelder KF
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2000 Aug; 131(8):1186-7. PubMed ID: 10953536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The use of resin-based composite in children.
    Donly KJ; García-Godoy F
    Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(5):480-8. PubMed ID: 12412963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.