These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

340 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9855293)

  • 41. Age-related changes across the primary and secondary somatosensory areas: an analysis of neuromagnetic oscillatory activities.
    Hagiwara K; Ogata K; Okamoto T; Uehara T; Hironaga N; Shigeto H; Kira J; Tobimatsu S
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2014 May; 125(5):1021-9. PubMed ID: 24189210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Methodological considerations for a better somatosensory gating paradigm: The impact of the inter-stimulus interval.
    Spooner RK; Eastman JA; Wiesman AI; Wilson TW
    Neuroimage; 2020 Oct; 220():117048. PubMed ID: 32544524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Somatosensory evoked magnetic fields following median nerve stimulation.
    Kakigi R
    Neurosci Res; 1994 Aug; 20(2):165-74. PubMed ID: 7808699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Simultaneous early processing of sensory input in human primary (SI) and secondary (SII) somatosensory cortices.
    Karhu J; Tesche CD
    J Neurophysiol; 1999 May; 81(5):2017-25. PubMed ID: 10322043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Selective attention regulates spatial and intensity information processing in the human primary somatosensory cortex.
    Iguchi Y; Hoshi Y; Tanosaki M; Taira M; Hashimoto I
    Neuroreport; 2002 Dec; 13(17):2335-9. PubMed ID: 12488822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effect of the number of pins and inter-pin distance on somatosensory evoked magnetic fields following mechanical tactile stimulation.
    Onishi H; Sugawara K; Yamashiro K; Sato D; Suzuki M; Kirimoto H; Tamaki H; Murakami H; Kameyama S
    Brain Res; 2013 Oct; 1535():78-88. PubMed ID: 24001589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Effects of tactile interference stimulation on somatosensory evoked magnetic fields.
    Kakigi R; Koyama S; Hoshiyama M; Kitamura Y; Shimojo M; Watanabe S; Nakamura A
    Neuroreport; 1996 Jan; 7(2):405-8. PubMed ID: 8730792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Activation of ipsilateral primary sensorimotor cortex by median nerve stimulation.
    Korvenoja A; Wikstrom H; Huttunen J; Virtanan J; Laine P; Aronen HJ; Seppalainen AM; Ilmoniemi RJ
    Neuroreport; 1995 Dec; 6(18):2589-93. PubMed ID: 8741769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Neuromagnetic somatosensory responses to natural moving tactile stimulation.
    Lin YY; Kajola M
    Can J Neurol Sci; 2003 Feb; 30(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 12619781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Detecting differences with magnetoencephalography of somatosensory processing after tactile and electrical stimuli.
    Hautasaari P; Kujala UM; Tarkka IM
    J Neurosci Methods; 2019 Jan; 311():331-337. PubMed ID: 30218670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Intracortical modulation of somatosensory evoked fields during movement: evidence for selective suppression of postsynaptic inhibition.
    Huttunen J; Lauronen L
    Brain Res; 2012 Jun; 1459():43-51. PubMed ID: 22564923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Temporal window of integration in the somatosensory modality: an MEG study.
    Yamashiro K; Inui K; Otsuru N; Urakawa T; Kakigi R
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2011 Nov; 122(11):2276-81. PubMed ID: 21524607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Spatiotemporal dynamics of bimanual integration in human somatosensory cortex and their relevance to bimanual object manipulation.
    Jung P; Klein JC; Wibral M; Hoechstetter K; Bliem B; Lu MK; Wahl M; Ziemann U
    J Neurosci; 2012 Apr; 32(16):5667-77. PubMed ID: 22514328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Nociceptive and non-nociceptive sub-regions in the human secondary somatosensory cortex: an MEG study using fMRI constraints.
    Torquati K; Pizzella V; Babiloni C; Del Gratta C; Della Penna S; Ferretti A; Franciotti R; Rossini PM; Romani GL
    Neuroimage; 2005 May; 26(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 15862204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effects of tactile interference stimulation on somatosensory evoked magnetic fields following tibial nerve stimulation.
    Naka D; Kakigi R; Koyama S; Xiang J; Suzuki H
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1998 Apr; 109(2):168-77. PubMed ID: 9741808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Correspondence between short-latency somatosensory evoked brain potentials and cortical magnetic fields following median nerve stimulation.
    Hoshiyama M; Kakigi R
    Brain Res; 2001 Jul; 908(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 11454324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Morphology of somatosensory evoked fields: inter-hemispheric similarity as a parameter for physiological and pathological neural connectivity.
    Tecchio F; Pasqualetti P; Pizzella V; Romani G; Rossini PM
    Neurosci Lett; 2000 Jun; 287(3):203-6. PubMed ID: 10863030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Common cortical network for first and second pain.
    Forss N; Raij TT; Seppä M; Hari R
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jan; 24(1):132-42. PubMed ID: 15588604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Cortical somatosensory magnetic responses in multiple sclerosis.
    Karhu J; Hari R; Mäkelä JP; Huttunen J; Knuutila J
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1992 Sep; 83(3):192-200. PubMed ID: 1381670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Effect of muscle contraction strength on gating of somatosensory magnetic fields.
    Sugawara K; Onishi H; Yamashiro K; Kotan S; Kojima S; Miyaguchi S; Tsubaki A; Kirimoto H; Tamaki H; Shirozu H; Kameyama S
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Nov; 234(11):3389-3398. PubMed ID: 27435203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.