These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9855561)

  • 41. Review of reviews 2014: a virtual issue.
    Diabetes Obes Metab; 2014 Jun; 16(6):481-2. PubMed ID: 24883450
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Dear Authors and Dear Readers!].
    Rajna P
    Ideggyogy Sz; 2009 Nov; 62(11-12):364-5. PubMed ID: 20025126
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Clinical Radiology and the web: branching out and linking in.
    Hansell DM
    Clin Radiol; 2005 May; 60(5):523. PubMed ID: 15851037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Cochrane Skin Group systematic reviews are more methodologically rigorous than other systematic reviews in dermatology.
    Collier A; Heilig L; Schilling L; Williams H; Dellavalle RP
    Br J Dermatol; 2006 Dec; 155(6):1230-5. PubMed ID: 17107394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Co-publishing Cochrane Library systematic reviews: journal editor and Cochrane Skin Group author experiences.
    Greene RE; Freeman SR; Lundahl K; Dellavalle RP
    Br J Dermatol; 2008 Jun; 158(6):1380-2. PubMed ID: 18384469
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Bigger and better: expanding in reviews and the electronic era.
    Paris J
    Can J Psychiatry; 2013 Jan; 58(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 23327748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Remodelling of the Scientific Committee and a new series of neuroepidemiology reviews].
    Sastre-Garriga J; Otero-Romero S
    Rev Neurol; 2018 Feb; 66(4):103. PubMed ID: 29435965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. JAMA Neurology-The Year in Review, 2017.
    Josephson SA
    JAMA Neurol; 2018 May; 75(5):540-541. PubMed ID: 29532047
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Systematic reviews and the Cochrane collaboration.
    Kale R; Silagy C
    Natl Med J India; 1996; 9(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 8713515
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [The PRISMA Statement - what should be reported about systematic reviews?].
    Antes G; von Elm E
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2009 Aug; 134(33):1619. PubMed ID: 19650021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [The systematic review is the foundation of evidence based medicine. One of the most important contributions to clinical medicine of the past decade].
    Eliasson M
    Lakartidningen; 2000 May; 97(22):2726-8. PubMed ID: 10900892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Comparative audit of clinical research in pediatric neurology.
    Al-Futaisi A; Shevell M
    J Child Neurol; 2004 Nov; 19(11):882-6. PubMed ID: 15658793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Sixty years of Pharmacological Reviews: has the role of review articles in biomedical sciences changed and, if so, how does this affect Pharmacological Reviews?
    Brass EP; Feldman RD
    Pharmacol Rev; 2009 Jun; 61(2):115-8. PubMed ID: 19549925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Systematic reviews and original articles differ in relevance, novelty, and use in an evidence-based service for physicians: PLUS project.
    McKinlay RJ; Cotoi C; Wilczynski NL; Haynes RB
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 May; 61(5):449-54. PubMed ID: 18394537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The top 100 cited neurorehabilitation papers.
    Kreutzer JS; Agyemang AA; Weedon D; Zasler N; Oliver M; Sorensen AA; van Wijngaarden S; Leahy E
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2017; 40(2):163-174. PubMed ID: 28222551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Neurology: A journal for authors and readers.
    Griggs RC; McGee K
    Neurology; 2000 Jul; 55(1):2. PubMed ID: 10891893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews in leading orthodontic journals: a quality paradigm?
    Fleming PS; Seehra J; Polychronopoulou A; Fedorowicz Z; Pandis N
    Eur J Orthod; 2013 Apr; 35(2):244-8. PubMed ID: 22510325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Searching for grey literature for systematic reviews: challenges and benefits.
    Mahood Q; Van Eerd D; Irvin E
    Res Synth Methods; 2014 Sep; 5(3):221-34. PubMed ID: 26052848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Studying systematic reviews.
    Del Mar C; Glasziou P
    J Fam Pract; 2001 Nov; 50(11):955-7. PubMed ID: 11711011
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Update on the European respiratory review.
    Humbert M
    Eur Respir J; 2010 Nov; 36(5):993-4. PubMed ID: 21037368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.