177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9855830)
21. In vitro antimicrobial activity of 0.5%, 1%, and 2.5% sodium hypochlorite in root canals instrumented with the ProTaper Universal system.
Câmara AC; de Albuquerque MM; Aguiar CM; de Barros Correia AC
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Aug; 108(2):e55-61. PubMed ID: 19615646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison between a hand stainless-steel K file and a rotary NiTi 0.04 taper.
Namazikhah MS; Mokhlis HR; Alasmakh K
J Calif Dent Assoc; 2000 Jun; 28(6):421-6. PubMed ID: 11324127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Shaping ability of two rotary instruments in simulated canals: stainless steel ENDOflash and nickel-titanium HERO Shaper.
Perez F; Schoumacher M; Peli JF
Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):637-44. PubMed ID: 16104977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Canal wall planning by engine-driven nickel-titanium instruments, compared with stainless-steel hand instrumentation.
Tucker DM; Wenckus CS; Bentkover SK
J Endod; 1997 Mar; 23(3):170-3. PubMed ID: 9594758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary nickel-titanium instruments and stainless steel hand K-Flexofiles in simulated curved root canals.
Schäfer E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Aug; 92(2):215-20. PubMed ID: 11505270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A retrospective study of endodontic treatment outcome between nickel-titanium rotary and stainless steel hand filing techniques.
Cheung GS; Liu CS
J Endod; 2009 Jul; 35(7):938-43. PubMed ID: 19567311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Antimicrobial efficacy of various root canal preparation techniques: an in vitro comparative study.
Pataky L; Iványi I; Grigár A; Fazekas A
J Endod; 2002 Aug; 28(8):603-5. PubMed ID: 12184424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. An ex vivo quantification of the apically extruded bacteria following use of nickel-titanium rotary instruments.
Mohammadi Z
J Clin Dent; 2007; 18(4):120-2. PubMed ID: 18277742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A comparative study of root canal preparation with NiTi-TEE and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
Jodway B; Hülsmann M
Int Endod J; 2006 Jan; 39(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16409331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Best of both worlds: stainless steel and nickel titanium.
Klein P
Dent Today; 1999 Jul; 18(7):66-9. PubMed ID: 10786173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Comparative study of hand-held nickel-titanium dental instruments based on the shape of the prepared root canal].
Szabó J; Serbán T; Nagy G; Madléna M; Ipolyi T
Fogorv Sz; 2003 Dec; 96(6):273-6. PubMed ID: 14971265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. In vitro evaluation of apical extrusion of bacteria following use of new rotary instrumentation system.
Mohammadi Z
N Y State Dent J; 2009 Apr; 75(3):28-30. PubMed ID: 19548490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Clinical evaluation of ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments in management of curved root canals].
Xu Q; Fan B; Fan MW; Bian Z
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Mar; 39(2):136-8. PubMed ID: 15061889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Shaping ability and safety of five different rotary nickel-titanium instruments compared with stainless steel hand instrumentation in simulated curved root canals.
Schirrmeister JF; Strohl C; Altenburger MJ; Wrbas KT; Hellwig E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Jun; 101(6):807-13. PubMed ID: 16731405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Bacterial reduction in infected root canals treated with 2.5% NaOCl as an irrigant and calcium hydroxide/camphorated paramonochlorophenol paste as an intracanal dressing.
Siqueira JF; Magalhães KM; Rôças IN
J Endod; 2007 Jun; 33(6):667-72. PubMed ID: 17509403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Retreatment efficacy of hand versus automated instrumentation in oval-shaped root canals: an ex vivo study.
Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Banegas G
Int Endod J; 2006 Jul; 39(7):521-6. PubMed ID: 16776756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Gutta-percha retreatment: effectiveness of nickel-titanium rotary instruments versus stainless steel hand files.
Barrieshi-Nusair KM
J Endod; 2002 Jun; 28(6):454-6. PubMed ID: 12067128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Influence of different types of automated devices on the shaping ability of rotary nickel-titanium FlexMaster instruments.
Schäfer E; Erler M; Dammaschke T
Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):627-36. PubMed ID: 16104976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Apical negative pressure irrigation versus conventional irrigation plus triantibiotic intracanal dressing on root canal disinfection in dog teeth.
Cohenca N; Heilborn C; Johnson JD; Flores DS; Ito IY; da Silva LA
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jan; 109(1):e42-6. PubMed ID: 20123368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Cross-sectional analysis of root canals prepared with NiTi rotary instruments and stainless steel reciprocating files.
Grande NM; Plotino G; Butti A; Messina F; Pameijer CH; Somma F
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Jan; 103(1):120-6. PubMed ID: 17178505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]