BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9855830)

  • 21. In vitro antimicrobial activity of 0.5%, 1%, and 2.5% sodium hypochlorite in root canals instrumented with the ProTaper Universal system.
    Câmara AC; de Albuquerque MM; Aguiar CM; de Barros Correia AC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Aug; 108(2):e55-61. PubMed ID: 19615646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison between a hand stainless-steel K file and a rotary NiTi 0.04 taper.
    Namazikhah MS; Mokhlis HR; Alasmakh K
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2000 Jun; 28(6):421-6. PubMed ID: 11324127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Shaping ability of two rotary instruments in simulated canals: stainless steel ENDOflash and nickel-titanium HERO Shaper.
    Perez F; Schoumacher M; Peli JF
    Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):637-44. PubMed ID: 16104977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Canal wall planning by engine-driven nickel-titanium instruments, compared with stainless-steel hand instrumentation.
    Tucker DM; Wenckus CS; Bentkover SK
    J Endod; 1997 Mar; 23(3):170-3. PubMed ID: 9594758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary nickel-titanium instruments and stainless steel hand K-Flexofiles in simulated curved root canals.
    Schäfer E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Aug; 92(2):215-20. PubMed ID: 11505270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A retrospective study of endodontic treatment outcome between nickel-titanium rotary and stainless steel hand filing techniques.
    Cheung GS; Liu CS
    J Endod; 2009 Jul; 35(7):938-43. PubMed ID: 19567311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Antimicrobial efficacy of various root canal preparation techniques: an in vitro comparative study.
    Pataky L; Iványi I; Grigár A; Fazekas A
    J Endod; 2002 Aug; 28(8):603-5. PubMed ID: 12184424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An ex vivo quantification of the apically extruded bacteria following use of nickel-titanium rotary instruments.
    Mohammadi Z
    J Clin Dent; 2007; 18(4):120-2. PubMed ID: 18277742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A comparative study of root canal preparation with NiTi-TEE and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
    Jodway B; Hülsmann M
    Int Endod J; 2006 Jan; 39(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16409331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Best of both worlds: stainless steel and nickel titanium.
    Klein P
    Dent Today; 1999 Jul; 18(7):66-9. PubMed ID: 10786173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Comparative study of hand-held nickel-titanium dental instruments based on the shape of the prepared root canal].
    Szabó J; Serbán T; Nagy G; Madléna M; Ipolyi T
    Fogorv Sz; 2003 Dec; 96(6):273-6. PubMed ID: 14971265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. In vitro evaluation of apical extrusion of bacteria following use of new rotary instrumentation system.
    Mohammadi Z
    N Y State Dent J; 2009 Apr; 75(3):28-30. PubMed ID: 19548490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Clinical evaluation of ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments in management of curved root canals].
    Xu Q; Fan B; Fan MW; Bian Z
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Mar; 39(2):136-8. PubMed ID: 15061889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Shaping ability and safety of five different rotary nickel-titanium instruments compared with stainless steel hand instrumentation in simulated curved root canals.
    Schirrmeister JF; Strohl C; Altenburger MJ; Wrbas KT; Hellwig E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Jun; 101(6):807-13. PubMed ID: 16731405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Bacterial reduction in infected root canals treated with 2.5% NaOCl as an irrigant and calcium hydroxide/camphorated paramonochlorophenol paste as an intracanal dressing.
    Siqueira JF; Magalhães KM; Rôças IN
    J Endod; 2007 Jun; 33(6):667-72. PubMed ID: 17509403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Retreatment efficacy of hand versus automated instrumentation in oval-shaped root canals: an ex vivo study.
    Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Banegas G
    Int Endod J; 2006 Jul; 39(7):521-6. PubMed ID: 16776756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Gutta-percha retreatment: effectiveness of nickel-titanium rotary instruments versus stainless steel hand files.
    Barrieshi-Nusair KM
    J Endod; 2002 Jun; 28(6):454-6. PubMed ID: 12067128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Influence of different types of automated devices on the shaping ability of rotary nickel-titanium FlexMaster instruments.
    Schäfer E; Erler M; Dammaschke T
    Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):627-36. PubMed ID: 16104976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Apical negative pressure irrigation versus conventional irrigation plus triantibiotic intracanal dressing on root canal disinfection in dog teeth.
    Cohenca N; Heilborn C; Johnson JD; Flores DS; Ito IY; da Silva LA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jan; 109(1):e42-6. PubMed ID: 20123368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cross-sectional analysis of root canals prepared with NiTi rotary instruments and stainless steel reciprocating files.
    Grande NM; Plotino G; Butti A; Messina F; Pameijer CH; Somma F
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Jan; 103(1):120-6. PubMed ID: 17178505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.