177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9855830)
41. Study of the progressive changes in canal shape after using different instruments by hand in simulated S-shaped canals.
Ding-ming H; Hong-xia L; Cheung GS; Lan Z; Hong T; Xue-dong Z
J Endod; 2007 Aug; 33(8):986-9. PubMed ID: 17878089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. A comparison of stainless steel hand and rotary nickel-titanium instrumentation using a silicone impression technique.
Chen JL; Messer HH
Aust Dent J; 2002 Mar; 47(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 12035951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Microbiological assessment of root canals following use of rotary and manual instruments in primary molars.
Subramaniam P; Tabrez TA; Babu KL
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2013; 38(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 24683774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Apical extrusion of debris using two hand and two rotary instrumentation techniques.
Reddy SA; Hicks ML
J Endod; 1998 Mar; 24(3):180-3. PubMed ID: 9558583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. An in vivo comparison of the Root ZX II, the Apex NRG XFR, and Mini Apex Locator by using rotary nickel-titanium files.
Siu C; Marshall JG; Baumgartner JC
J Endod; 2009 Jul; 35(7):962-5. PubMed ID: 19567315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. A comparison of the canal centering ability of ProFile, K3, and RaCe Nickel Titanium rotary systems.
Al-Sudani D; Al-Shahrani S
J Endod; 2006 Dec; 32(12):1198-201. PubMed ID: 17174683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Schäfer E; Vlassis M
Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Clinical investigation of the efficacy of chemomechanical preparation with rotary nickel-titanium files for removal of endotoxin from primarily infected root canals.
Martinho FC; Chiesa WM; Marinho AC; Zaia AA; Ferraz CC; Almeida JF; Souza-Filho FJ; Gomes BP
J Endod; 2010 Nov; 36(11):1766-9. PubMed ID: 20951284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Effect of tip design of nickel-titanium and stainless steel files on root canal preparation.
Kuhn WG; Carnes DL; Clement DJ; Walker WA
J Endod; 1997 Dec; 23(12):735-8. PubMed ID: 9487848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Root canal shaping using rotary nickel-titanium files in preclinical teaching.
Georgelin-Gurgel M; Devillard R; Lauret ME; Diemer F; Calas P; Hennequin M
Odontostomatol Trop; 2008 Mar; 31(121):5-11. PubMed ID: 18623974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Analysis of mechanical preparations in extracted teeth using ProTaper rotary instruments: value of the safety quotient.
Blum JY; Machtou P; Ruddle C; Micallef JP
J Endod; 2003 Sep; 29(9):567-75. PubMed ID: 14503829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. The effect of instrumentation with two different file types, each with 2.5% NaOCl irrigation on the microhardness of root dentin.
Slutzky-Goldberg I; Liberman R; Heling I
J Endod; 2002 Apr; 28(4):311-2. PubMed ID: 12043870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Bacterial reduction and persistence after endodontic treatment procedures.
Sakamoto M; Siqueira JF; Rôças IN; Benno Y
Oral Microbiol Immunol; 2007 Feb; 22(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 17241166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Influence of cervical preflaring on apical file size determination.
Pecora JD; Capelli A; Guerisoli DM; Spanó JC; Estrela C
Int Endod J; 2005 Jul; 38(7):430-5. PubMed ID: 15946262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Anatomic Endodontic Technology (AET)--a crown-down root canal preparation technique: basic concepts, operative procedure and instruments.
Riitano F
Int Endod J; 2005 Aug; 38(8):575-87. PubMed ID: 16011778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. A comparison of the shaping abilities of 4 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated root canals.
Yun HH; Kim SK
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Feb; 95(2):228-33. PubMed ID: 12582365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Mechanical reduction in intracanal Enterococcus faecalis when using three different single-file systems: an ex vivo comparative study.
Üreyen Kaya B; Erik CE; Sesli Çetin E; Köle M; Maden M
Int Endod J; 2019 Jan; 52(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 29985531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Efficacy of bacterial removal from instrumented root canals in vitro related to instrumentation technique and size.
Rollison S; Barnett F; Stevens RH
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 Sep; 94(3):366-71. PubMed ID: 12324795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. A comparison of three rotary systems and hand instrumentation technique for the elimination of Enterococcus faecalis from the root canal.
Gorduysus M; Nagas E; Torun OY; Gorduysus O
Aust Endod J; 2011 Dec; 37(3):128-33. PubMed ID: 22117720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Comparative study of root-canal shaping with stainless steel and rotary NiTi files performed by preclinical dental students.
Alrahabi M
Technol Health Care; 2015; 23(3):257-65. PubMed ID: 25669210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
