153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9856072)
1. Court-ordered cesareans--choice or control?
Rowan C
Nurs Ethics; 1998 Nov; 5(6):542-4. PubMed ID: 9856072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. In re A.C.
Bourke LH
Issues Law Med; 1990; 6(3):299-304. PubMed ID: 2279918
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Sheila Kitzinger's letter from Europe: court-ordered cesareans in the United Kingdom.
Kitzinger S
Birth; 1998 Sep; 25(3):202-3. PubMed ID: 9767224
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Pregnant women and consent to medical treatment.
Ginn DE
Health Law Can; 1994; 15(2):41-8. PubMed ID: 10153629
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Medical interventions during pregnancy and childbirth.
Rodgers ME
Br J Nurs; 1998 Nov 26-Dec 9; 7(21):1341. PubMed ID: 10076211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Foreclosing the use of force: A.C. reversed.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(4):27-9. PubMed ID: 2211083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparative analysis of the right of a pregnant woman to refuse medical treatment for herself and her viable fetus: the United States and United Kingdom.
Glass BJ
Indiana Int Comp Law Rev; 2001; 11(2):507-41. PubMed ID: 12680376
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Whose rights supersede, those of the patient or those of the unborn fetus?
Cady RF
JONAS Healthc Law Ethics Regul; 1999 Mar; 1(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 10823985
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Caesareans under duress.
Health Care Anal; 1997 Jun; 5(2):160-3. PubMed ID: 10167719
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Court-authorised caesarean section.
Edozien L
BJOG; 2014 Aug; 121(9):1096. PubMed ID: 25047485
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Consent, compulsion and the rights of the mother and unborn child.
Dimond B
Midwives Chron; 1986 Apr; 99(1179):78-80. PubMed ID: 2939328
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Forcible caesarean: a new direction in British maternity care? Thoughts on the case of Mrs S.
Crafter H
Nurs Ethics; 1994 Mar; 1(1):53-5. PubMed ID: 7828056
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Court-authorised caesarean sections--the end of a trend?
Michalowski S
Mod Law Rev; 1999 Jan; 62(1):115-27. PubMed ID: 12741389
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The judge in the delivery room: the emergence of court-ordered cesareans.
Rhoden NK
Calif Law Rev; 1986 Dec; 74(6):1951-2030. PubMed ID: 11658950
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Burton v. Florida: Maternal-fetal conflicts and medical decision-making during pregnancy.
Wevers K
J Law Med Ethics; 2010; 38(2):436-40. PubMed ID: 20579240
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Cesareans and Samaritans.
Rhoden NK
Law Med Health Care; 1987; 15(3):118-25. PubMed ID: 3695574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Court-authorised caesareans: new guidance.
Health Care Anal; 1997 Sep; 5(3):240-3. PubMed ID: 10184767
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Court orders caesarean section.
Bull Med Ethics; 1992 Oct; No. 82():3-4. PubMed ID: 11651514
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Uncertainty and medical authority in the world of Jay Katz.
Burt RA
Law Med Health Care; 1988; 16(3-4):190-6. PubMed ID: 3205049
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. In the U.K., children can't just say no.
Kessel R
Hastings Cent Rep; 1993; 23(2):20-1. PubMed ID: 8463084
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
