These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9856072)

  • 21. Court-ordered cesareans: can a pregnant woman refuse?
    Leavine BA
    Houst Law Rev; 1992; 29(1):185-218. PubMed ID: 11656666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. After Re S.
    Thomson M
    Med Law Rev; 1994; 2(2):127-48. PubMed ID: 12159826
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Enforced caesareans.
    Bull Med Ethics; 1997 Apr; (127):21-4. PubMed ID: 16127837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Court-ordered cesareans: a growing concern for indigent women.
    Daniels JA
    Clgh Rev; 1988 Feb; 21(9):1064-71. PubMed ID: 11649972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Enforced caesarean section: a US appeal.
    Brahams D
    Lancet; 1990 May; 335(8700):1270. PubMed ID: 1971334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An Orwellian scenario: court ordered caesarean section and women's autonomy.
    Cahill H
    Nurs Ethics; 1999 Nov; 6(6):494-505. PubMed ID: 10696195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Legal aspects of consent 7: young persons of 16 and 17 years.
    Dimond B
    Br J Nurs; 2001 Jun 14-27; 10(11):732-3. PubMed ID: 12048490
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The legal context of practice. 2: Consent and compromised capacity.
    Gajos MJ
    Ment Health Care; 1998 Mar; 1(7):239-42. PubMed ID: 9791427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Legal aspects of consent 11: compulsory Caesarean sections.
    Dimond B
    Br J Nurs; 2001 Aug 9-Sep 12; 10(15):1002-4. PubMed ID: 11923735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Legal aspects of consent 9: when parents are overruled.
    Dimond B
    Br J Nurs; 2001 Jul 12-25; 10(13):880-1. PubMed ID: 11927888
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Maternal-fetal conflict: court-ordered cesarean section.
    Lindgren K
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 1996 Oct; 25(8):653-6. PubMed ID: 8912215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Health care law ... focus on consent.
    Health Care Anal; 1993 Jun; 1(1):74-8. PubMed ID: 10134360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Appeal court rules against compulsory caesarean sections.
    Dyer C
    BMJ; 1997 Apr; 314(7086):993. PubMed ID: 9112838
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Fetus as ward of court?
    Brahams D
    Lancet; 1988 Feb; 1(8581):369-70. PubMed ID: 2893185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. When love and abuse are not mutually exclusive: the need for government intervention.
    Obernberger S
    Issues Law Med; 1997; 12(4):355-81. PubMed ID: 9114605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Consent and minors.
    Sharpe G
    Health Law Can; 1993; 13(3):197-207. PubMed ID: 10125791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Court-ordered cesarean sections: an example of the dangers of judicial involvement in medical decision making.
    Stanyer BT
    Gonzaga Law Rev; 1992-1993; 28(1):121-40. PubMed ID: 11654037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. In re A.C.: a court-ordered cesarean becomes precedent for nonconsensual organ harvesting.
    Sturgess RH
    Nova Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):649-69. PubMed ID: 11650356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Children's rights.
    Dickenson DL
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1999; 29(1):5. PubMed ID: 10052003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The child patient and consent to treatment: legal overview.
    Rodgers ME
    Br J Community Nurs; 2000 Oct; 5(10):494-8. PubMed ID: 12181517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.