These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9856163)

  • 1. [A lack of understanding of the rulings by disciplinary committees].
    Hubben JH
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1998 Aug; 142(33):1851-3. PubMed ID: 9856163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Recent disciplinary committee rulings foster defensive medicine].
    van Weel C
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1998 Aug; 142(33):1854-5. PubMed ID: 9856164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Medical scientific research with people: what the law does not regulate].
    van Agt FM; Dekkers WJ; van Riel PL
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Jan; 143(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 10086100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving the peer review process: develop a professional review committee for better and quicker results.
    Agee C
    Healthc Exec; 2007; 22(3):72-3. PubMed ID: 17523355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Liability for peer review.
    Johnson LJ
    Med Econ; 2002 Aug; 79(16):80. PubMed ID: 12226893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Time for professionalising the system of medical ethics review in the Netherlands].
    Kenter MJ; Visser HK
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2003 Aug; 147(35):1672-5. PubMed ID: 14513537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reallocating liability to medical staff review committee members: a response to the hospital corporate liability doctrine.
    Peters GG
    Am J Law Med; 1984; 10(1):115-38. PubMed ID: 6391158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The co-regulation of medical discipline: challenging medical peer review.
    Thomas D
    J Law Med; 2004 Feb; 11(3):382-9. PubMed ID: 15018214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. State level expert review committees--are they protected?
    Wright RF; Smith JC
    Public Health Rep; 1990; 105(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 2106700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What's new with peer review?
    Morrow JA
    Mo Med; 1995 Dec; 92(12):723-6. PubMed ID: 8587563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improving "medical necessity" acceptance by health care providers and consumers.
    Hepps SA
    Physician Exec; 1994 Jul; 20(7):22-3. PubMed ID: 10136172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Dentists and peer review: results of a descriptive study on perceived effects of peer review].
    Bennema-Broos M; Sluijs EM; Wagner C
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2002 Jan; 109(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 11933606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Protecting the confidentiality of peer review information.
    McCann RW
    J AHIMA; 1993 Dec; 64(12):52-6; quiz 57-8. PubMed ID: 10130489
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An overview of the ACR Committee on Ethics: from hospital contracts to expert witness testimony.
    Janower ML; Hoffman TR
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 May; 2(5):424-7. PubMed ID: 17411848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Views of physicians, disciplinary board members and practicing lawyers on the new statutory disciplinary system for health care in The Netherlands.
    Cuperus-Bosma JM; Hout FA; Hubben JH; van der Wal G
    Health Policy; 2006 Jul; 77(2):202-11. PubMed ID: 16125274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fair hearing/peer review: truth or oxymoron?
    Chalifoux RF
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2000 Dec; 100(12):761-2. PubMed ID: 11213660
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Understanding and dealing with PSRO: the role of the advisory committee.
    Savage J
    Mich Hosp; 1979 Aug; 15(8):4-7. PubMed ID: 10273166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. New committee to oversee relationship between CMA, CMAJ.
    Sullivan P
    CMAJ; 2003 Feb; 168(3):332. PubMed ID: 12566356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Important provisions of Act 766 of 2013 (Arkansas Peer Review Fairness Act).
    Wroten D
    J Ark Med Soc; 2013 Sep; 110(4):52. PubMed ID: 24079051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Are we overwhelming physicians with medical record review?
    Spath PL
    J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1985 Feb; 56(2):25-8. PubMed ID: 10289611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.