171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9857309)
1. The United States Government scientific misconduct regulations and the handling of issues related to research integrity.
Price AR
J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1993; 3 Suppl 1():253-64. PubMed ID: 9857309
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Introduction to misconduct in science and scientific duties.
Soskolne CL
J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1993; 3 Suppl 1():245-51. PubMed ID: 9857308
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Due process in investigations of research misconduct.
Mello MM; Brennan TA
N Engl J Med; 2003 Sep; 349(13):1280-6. PubMed ID: 14507953
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Walters and Richards comment on the examination of terminal digits of questioned data as used by the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) of the Public Health Service in misconduct cases.
Mosimann JE
IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2002; 21(6):8-9; author reply 9-11. PubMed ID: 12613205
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Soft responses to misconduct.
Nature; 2002 Nov; 420(6913):253. PubMed ID: 12447400
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Office of Research Integrity: a reflection of disputes and misunderstandings.
Scheetz MD
Croat Med J; 1999 Sep; 40(3):321-5. PubMed ID: 10523125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. "Thank God for the lawyers": some thoughts on the (mis)regulation of scientific misconduct.
Reynolds GH
Tenn Law Rev; 1999; 66(3):801-18. PubMed ID: 12625356
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. US realigns misconduct offices at NIH.
Anderson C
Nature; 1992 Jun; 357(6378):431. PubMed ID: 1319001
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The federal research misconduct regulations as viewed from the research universities.
Wright DE
Centen Rev; 1994; 38(2):249-72. PubMed ID: 11656759
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Office of Scientific Integrity investigations: the importance of data analysis.
Price AA; Hallum JV
Account Res; 1992; 2(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 16144092
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Giving scientists their due. The Imanishi-Kari decision.
Dresser R
Hastings Cent Rep; 1997; 27(3):26-8. PubMed ID: 9219021
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Research misconduct events increased yet again in 2002.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2003 Oct; 18(10):2. PubMed ID: 14682337
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Scientific fraud and misconduct.
Klein DF
J Clin Psychopharmacol; 1991 Dec; 11(6):337-8. PubMed ID: 1663134
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Change in fraud review proposed.
Culliton BJ
Nature; 1992 Mar; 356(6366):191. PubMed ID: 1313150
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Researcher sues government and specific agency official over misconduct investigation.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2001 Feb; 16(2):9. PubMed ID: 12530382
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Trouble for Healy over misconduct office.
Aldhous P
Nature; 1991 Aug; 352(6334):361. PubMed ID: 1650429
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Safeguards added for appeals in misconduct cases.
Anderson C
Nature; 1992 Nov; 360(6401):202. PubMed ID: 1331812
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. ORI to study why cheaters cheat.
Ready T
Nat Med; 2000 Sep; 6(9):946. PubMed ID: 10973292
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Research misconduct and its federal regulation: the origin and history of the Office of Research Integrity--with personal views by ORI's former associate director for investigative oversight.
Price AR
Account Res; 2013; 20(5-6):291-319. PubMed ID: 24028479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Office of Scientific Integrity.
Raub WF
Lancet; 1991 Apr; 337(8747):980. PubMed ID: 1678060
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
