These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9857309)
41. The investigation of scientific misconduct: some observations and suggestions. Mishkin B New Biol; 1991 Sep; 3(9):821-3. PubMed ID: 1657125 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. On identifying research misconduct respondents. Parrish DM Sci Eng Ethics; 2005 Apr; 11(2):171-2. PubMed ID: 15915856 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. At NIH, a new maelstrom over misconduct. Greenberg DS Lancet; 1991 Aug; 338(8762):301-2. PubMed ID: 1677123 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Scientific misconduct and research integrity for the bench scientist. Pascal CB Proc Soc Exp Biol Med; 2000 Sep; 224(4):220-30. PubMed ID: 10964256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. OSIR finds Gallo report a hot potato. Science; 1992 Jun; 256(5064):1619. PubMed ID: 1319085 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Storage of research data: why, how, where? Thomas SP Nurs Res; 1992; 41(5):309-11. PubMed ID: 1523114 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Fabricated data. Clayton GM; Poon LW; Johnson MA; Martin P Int J Aging Hum Dev; 1996; 42(3):249-50. PubMed ID: 8805086 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Toward global standardization of conducting fair investigations of allegations of research misconduct. Nouchi R; Aihara H; Arie F; Asashima M; Daida H; Fudano J; Fujiwara Y; Fushiki S; Geller RJ; Hatano K; Homma T; Kimura M; Kuroki T; Miki K; Morita I; Nitta K; Shinohara A; Siomi MC; Yoshida M; Ichikawa I Account Res; 2020 Aug; 27(6):327-346. PubMed ID: 32223327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Incarceration, restitution, and lifetime debarment: legal consequences of scientific misconduct in the Eric Poehlman case: Commentary on: "Scientific forensics: how the office of research integrity can assist institutional investigations of research misconduct during oversight review". Tilden SJ Sci Eng Ethics; 2010 Dec; 16(4):737-41. PubMed ID: 20842537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The Dingell hearings on scientific misconduct. Blunt instruments indeed. Healy B N Engl J Med; 1993 Sep; 329(10):725-7. PubMed ID: 8393964 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Legal defenses to the use of data digits to identify fabricated data. Walter C; Richards EP IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2002; 21(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 12012610 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. ORI defended. Price AR Nature; 1996 Jan; 379(6560):11. PubMed ID: 8538729 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Innovation and integrity in biomedical research. Jasanoff S Acad Med; 1993 Sep; 68(9 Suppl):S91-5. PubMed ID: 8396941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Research integrity: Sabotage! Maher B Nature; 2010 Sep; 467(7315):516-8. PubMed ID: 20881988 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. New evidence emerges in Tufts misconduct case. Anderson C Nature; 1990 Sep; 347(6291):317. PubMed ID: 2170844 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]