These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9857521)

  • 21. Evaluation of ultrasound for prediction of carcass fat thickness and longissimus muscle area in feedlot steers.
    Smith MT; Oltjen JW; Dolezal HG; Gill DR; Behrens BD
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Jan; 70(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 1582915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The abdominal subcutaneous tissue: computed tomographic, magnetic resonance, and anatomical observations.
    Johnson D; Dixon AK; Abrahams PH
    Clin Anat; 1996; 9(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 8838275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Temperature elevations computed for three-layer and four-layer obstetrical tissue models in nonlinear and linear ultrasonic propagation cases.
    Wójcik J; Filipczyński L; Kujawska T
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1999 Feb; 25(2):259-67. PubMed ID: 10320315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Regional differences in ultrasonic assessment of subcutaneous fat thickness in the abdomen: effects on the TRAM flap.
    Yano K; Hosokawa K; Nakai K; Kubo T; Matsuo Y
    Ann Plast Surg; 2003 Aug; 51(2):130-5. PubMed ID: 12897514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Human in situ dosimetry: differential insertion loss during passage through abdominal wall and myometrium.
    Siddiqi TA; O'Brien WD; Meyer RA; Sullivan JM; Miodovnik M
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1992; 18(8):681-9. PubMed ID: 1440990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Thermal and elastic response of subcutaneous tissue with different fibrous septa architectures to RF heating: numerical study.
    González-Suárez A; Gutierrez-Herrera E; Berjano E; Jimenez Lozano JN; Franco W
    Lasers Surg Med; 2015 Feb; 47(2):183-95. PubMed ID: 25651998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Ultrasonic prediction of carcass merit in beef cattle: evaluation of technician effects on ultrasonic estimates of carcass fat thickness and longissimus muscle area.
    Perkins TL; Green RD; Hamlin KE; Shepard HH; Miller MF
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Sep; 70(9):2758-65. PubMed ID: 1399892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Correction of ultrasonic wave aberration with a time delay and amplitude filter.
    Måsøy SE; Johansen TF; Angelsen B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Apr; 113(4 Pt 1):2009-20. PubMed ID: 12703712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Investigation of the effect of subcutaneous fat on image quality performance of 2D conventional imaging and tissue harmonic imaging.
    Browne JE; Watson AJ; Hoskins PR; Elliott AT
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Jul; 31(7):957-64. PubMed ID: 15972201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of ultrasonic estimates of carcass fat thickness and longissimus muscle area in beef cattle.
    Perkins TL; Green RD; Hamlin KE
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Apr; 70(4):1002-10. PubMed ID: 1582927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. In vivo ultrasonographic exposimetry: human tissue-specific attenuation coefficients in the gynecologic examination.
    Siddiqi TA; Miodovnik M; Meyer RA; O'Brien WD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Apr; 180(4):866-74. PubMed ID: 10203654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Spectral estimation for characterization of acoustic aberration.
    Varslot T; Angelsen B; Waag RC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jul; 116(1):97-108. PubMed ID: 15295969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [The morphometric indices and echo structure of the muscles of the human abdominal wall under the action of physical loading].
    Kogut BM; Sanigurskiĭ GIu; Ivanova LI
    Morfologiia; 1993; 105(7-8):120-8. PubMed ID: 7951914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Simulation of ultrasonic focus aberration and correction through human tissue.
    Tabei M; Mast TD; Waag RC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Feb; 113(2):1166-76. PubMed ID: 12597210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Hypoechoic fat: a sonographic pitfall.
    Spencer GM; Rubens DJ; Roach DJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 May; 164(5):1277-80. PubMed ID: 7717247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Computational models of distributed aberration in ultrasound breast imaging.
    Shen YT; Daoud MI; Lacefield JC
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2010 Dec; 57(12):2627-36. PubMed ID: 21156359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Panorama ultrasonography of the abdominal wall for delineation of the anatomy and diagnosis of pathological findings].
    Krombach GA; Truong S; Staatz G; Mahnken A; Prescher A; Tacke J; Weidner J; Günther RW
    Rofo; 2001 Aug; 173(8):714-9. PubMed ID: 11570241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A new approach to compensate the geometric distortion in the synthetic aperture ultrasonic imaging system.
    He X; Liu W; Chen S; Qin Z
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 26 Suppl 1():S1623-32. PubMed ID: 26405927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Influences of age and sex on abdominal muscle and subcutaneous fat thickness.
    Kanehisa H; Miyatani M; Azuma K; Kuno S; Fukunaga T
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2004 May; 91(5-6):534-7. PubMed ID: 14735364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reproducibility of rehabilitative ultrasound imaging for the measurement of abdominal muscle activity: a systematic review.
    Costa LO; Maher CG; Latimer J; Smeets RJ
    Phys Ther; 2009 Aug; 89(8):756-69. PubMed ID: 19520732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.