These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
400 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9857588)
1. Influence of prosthesis material on stress distribution in bone and implant: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Stegaroiu R; Kusakari H; Nishiyama S; Miyakawa O Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(6):781-90. PubMed ID: 9857588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stress distribution on the metal framework of the implant-supported fixed prosthesis using different veneering materials. Ciftçi Y; Canay S Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(5):406-11. PubMed ID: 12066633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of veneering materials on stress distribution in implant-supported fixed prosthetic restorations. Ciftçi Y; Canay S Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(4):571-82. PubMed ID: 10960992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Selection of the implant transgingival height for optimal biomechanical properties: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Sun Y; Kong L; Hu K; Xie C; Zhou H; Liu Y; Liu B Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 47(5):393-8. PubMed ID: 18977057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of prosthesis materials and prosthesis splinting on peri-implant bone stress around implants in poor-quality bone: a numeric analysis. Wang TM; Leu LJ; Wang J; Lin LD Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(2):231-7. PubMed ID: 11958406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of superstructure materials on strain around an implant under 2 loading conditions: a technical investigation. Stegaroiu R; Khraisat A; Nomura S; Miyakawa O Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):735-42. PubMed ID: 15508991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of superstructure materials and misfit on stress distribution in a single implant-supported prosthesis: a finite element analysis. Assunção WG; Gomes EA; Barão VA; Delben JA; Tabata LF; de Sousa EA J Craniofac Surg; 2010 May; 21(3):689-95. PubMed ID: 20485030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Finite element analysis study of the effect of superstructure material on stress distribution in an implant-supported fixed prosthesis. Sertgöz A Int J Prosthodont; 1997; 10(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 9484066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical effect of platform switching in implant dentistry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Chang CL; Chen CS; Hsu ML Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):295-304. PubMed ID: 20369087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Tada S; Stegaroiu R; Kitamura E; Miyakawa O; Kusakari H Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):357-68. PubMed ID: 12814310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical effects of two different collar implant structures on stress distribution under cantilever fixed partial dentures. Merıç G; Erkmen E; Kurt A; Eser A; özden AU Acta Odontol Scand; 2011 Nov; 69(6):374-84. PubMed ID: 21449688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of framework shape on the fracture strength of implant-supported all-ceramic fixed partial dentures in the molar region. Tsumita M; Kokubo Y; Vult von Steyern P; Fukushima S J Prosthodont; 2008 Jun; 17(4):274-85. PubMed ID: 18205740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of implant number, distribution and prosthesis material on loading on implants supporting fixed prostheses. Ogawa T; Dhaliwal S; Naert I; Mine A; Kronstrom M; Sasaki K; Duyck J J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Jul; 37(7):525-31. PubMed ID: 20236236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical comparison of implant retained fixed partial dentures with fiber reinforced composite versus conventional metal frameworks: a 3D FEA study. Erkmen E; Meriç G; Kurt A; Tunç Y; Eser A J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2011 Jan; 4(1):107-16. PubMed ID: 21094484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone. Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Finite element analysis of stress-breaking attachments on maxillary implant-retained overdentures. Tanino F; Hayakawa I; Hirano S; Minakuchi S Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 17455444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of metal-ceramic or all-ceramic superstructure materials on stress distribution in a single implant-supported prosthesis: three-dimensional finite element analysis. Gomes ÉA; Barão VA; Rocha EP; de Almeida ÉO; Assunção WG Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1202-9. PubMed ID: 22167424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stress distribution on external hexagon implant system using 3d finite element analysis. Segundo RM; Oshima HM; Silva IN; Júnior LH; Mota EG; Coelho LF Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2007; 20(2):79-81. PubMed ID: 18590255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of implant diameter, insertion depth, and loading angle on stress/strain fields in implant/jawbone systems: finite element analysis. Qian L; Todo M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):877-86. PubMed ID: 19865628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of implant abutment type on stress distribution in bone under various loading conditions using finite element analysis. Chun HJ; Shin HS; Han CH; Lee SH Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 16634489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]