1177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9857595)
1. Hot isostatic pressing-processed hydroxyapatite-coated titanium implants: light microscopic and scanning electron microscopy investigations.
Wie H; Herø H; Solheim T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(6):837-44. PubMed ID: 9857595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Histomorphometric and fluorescence microscopic evaluation of interfacial bone healing around 3 different dental implants before and after radiation therapy.
Weinlaender M; Beumer J; Kenney EB; Lekovic V; Holmes R; Moy PK; Plenk H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):212-24. PubMed ID: 16634491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Histologic and histomorphometric comparison of immediately placed hydroxyapatite-coated and titanium plasma-sprayed implants: a pilot study in dogs.
Karabuda C; Sandalli P; Yalcin S; Steflik DE; Parr GR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(4):510-5. PubMed ID: 10453665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bone response to titanium implants coated with thin sputtered HA film subject to hydrothermal treatment and implanted in the canine mandible.
Ozeki K; Okuyama Y; Fukui Y; Aoki H
Biomed Mater Eng; 2006; 16(4):243-51. PubMed ID: 16971742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of 3 different endosseous nonsubmerged implants in edentulous mandibles: a clinical report.
Røynesdal AK; Ambjørnsen E; Haanaes HR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(4):543-8. PubMed ID: 10453670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of titanium plasma-sprayed and plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite implants in vivo.
Ong JL; Carnes DL; Bessho K
Biomaterials; 2004 Aug; 25(19):4601-6. PubMed ID: 15120505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Histomorphometric analysis of a half hydroxyapatite-coated implant in humans: a pilot study.
Iamoni F; Rasperini G; Trisi P; Simion M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(5):729-35. PubMed ID: 10531745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Marginal bone loss pattern around hydroxyapatite-coated versus commercially pure titanium implants after up to 12 years of follow-up.
Schwartz-Arad D; Mardinger O; Levin L; Kozlovsky A; Hirshberg A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 15839117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ultrastructure of the interface between titanium and surrounding tissue in rat tibiae--a comparison study on titanium-coated and -uncoated plastic implants.
Okamatsu K; Kido H; Sato A; Watazu A; Matsuura M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Jun; 9(2):100-11. PubMed ID: 17535334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biological performance of chemical hydroxyapatite coating associated with implant surface modification by laser beam: biomechanical study in rabbit tibias.
Faeda RS; Tavares HS; Sartori R; Guastaldi AC; Marcantonio E
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1706-15. PubMed ID: 19615586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of titanium implant surface modification with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in progressive early bone-implant fixation in vivo.
Lin A; Wang CJ; Kelly J; Gubbi P; Nishimura I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):808-16. PubMed ID: 19865620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Histomorphometric analysis of the bone-implant contact obtained with 4 different implant surface treatments placed side by side in the dog mandible.
Novaes AB; Souza SL; de Oliveira PT; Souza AM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 12074453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Osseointegration of a hydroxyapatite-coated multilayered mesh stem.
Kusakabe H; Sakamaki T; Nihei K; Oyama Y; Yanagimoto S; Ichimiya M; Kimura J; Toyama Y
Biomaterials; 2004 Jul; 25(15):2957-69. PubMed ID: 14967528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vivo performance of a modified CSTi dental implant coating.
Story BJ; Wagner WR; Gaisser DM; Cook SD; Rust-Dawicki AM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(6):749-57. PubMed ID: 9857585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bonding capacity in bone of HIP-processed HA-coated titanium: mechanical and histological investigations.
Wie H; Herø H; Solheim T; Kleven E; Rørvik AM; Haanaes HR
J Biomed Mater Res; 1995 Nov; 29(11):1443-9. PubMed ID: 8582913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Histomorphometric analyses of bone interface with titanium-aluminum-vanadium and hydroxyapatite-coated implants by biomimetic process.
Zagury R; Harari ND; Conz MB; Soares Gde A; Vidigal GM
Implant Dent; 2007 Sep; 16(3):290-6. PubMed ID: 17846545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effects of a stress-absorbing system involved in the superstructure supported by hydroxyapatite-coated implants in monkeys.
Kaide H; Akagawa Y; Hashimoto M; Tenma H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 7744441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characterization of the surface properties of commercially available dental implants using scanning electron microscopy, focused ion beam, and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy.
Jarmar T; Palmquist A; Brånemark R; Hermansson L; Engqvist H; Thomsen P
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Mar; 10(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 18254738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Increased bone formation around coated implants.
Stadlinger B; Bierbaum S; Grimmer S; Schulz MC; Kuhlisch E; Scharnweber D; Eckelt U; Mai R
J Clin Periodontol; 2009 Aug; 36(8):698-704. PubMed ID: 19531092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of hydroxyapatite (HA) -coated threaded, HA-coated cylindric, and titanium threaded endosseous dental implants.
Jeffcoat MK; McGlumphy EA; Reddy MS; Geurs NC; Proskin HM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):406-10. PubMed ID: 12814316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
