153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9858977)
1. Field validation of passive monitors for the determination of employee exposures to methylene chloride in pharmaceutical production facilities.
Charron KA; Puskar MA; Levine SP
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1998 May; 59(5):353-8. PubMed ID: 9858977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Field precision of formaldehyde sampling and analysis using NIOSH method 3500.
Akbar-Khanzadeh F; Park CK
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1997 Sep; 58(9):657-60. PubMed ID: 9291564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Laboratory and field validation of a JXC charcoal sampling and analytical method for monitoring short-term exposures to ethylene oxide.
Puskar MA; Nowak JL; Hecker LH
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1988 May; 49(5):237-43. PubMed ID: 3400587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Field validation of three passive dosimeters for excursion limit monitoring of ethylene oxide.
Szopinski FG; Puskar MA; Hecker LH
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1991 Apr; 52(4):151-6; discussion 156-7. PubMed ID: 2069122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development and validation of a protocol for field validation of passive dosimeters for ethylene oxide excursion limit monitoring.
Puskar MA; Szopinski FG; Hecker LH
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1991 Apr; 52(4):145-50. PubMed ID: 2069121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the Du Pont Pro-Tek Formaldehyde Badge and the 3M Formaldehyde Monitor.
Kennedy ER; Hull RD
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1986 Feb; 47(2):94-105. PubMed ID: 3953425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of real-time techniques to measure hydrogen peroxide in air at the permissible exposure limit.
Puskar MA; Plese MR
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1996 Sep; 57(9):843-8. PubMed ID: 8865593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sub-part-per-million diffusional sampling for ethylene oxide with the 3M #3550 ethylene oxide monitor.
Mullins HE
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1985 Oct; 46(10):625-31. PubMed ID: 4061293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A field study to assess the long-term sampling feasibility of evacuated canisters and the development of a mathematical model to analyze potential sampling bias.
Rossner A; Wick DP
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2005 Sep; 2(9):474-80. PubMed ID: 16105798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Field evaluation of a sampling and analytical method for environmental levels of airborne hexavalent chromium.
Sheehan P; Ricks R; Ripple S; Paustenbach D
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1992 Jan; 53(1):57-68. PubMed ID: 1590220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Benzene in air--organic vapor monitors versus charcoal tubes.
Pristas R
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1991 Jul; 52(7):297-304. PubMed ID: 1951067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An evaluation of the accuracy and reliability of ethylene oxide diffusion badge monitors.
Loving TJ; Allen RO; Mosher TJ
Med Instrum; 1984; 18(6):309-17. PubMed ID: 6521676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laboratory validation of five commercially available methods for sampling ethylene oxide in air.
Kring EV; McGibney PD; Thornley GD
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1985 Oct; 46(10):620-4. PubMed ID: 4061292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Formaldehyde: a comparative evaluation of four monitoring methods.
Coyne LB; Cook RE; Mann JR; Bouyoucos S; McDonald OF; Baldwin CL
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1985 Oct; 46(10):609-19. PubMed ID: 4061291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison between active (pumped) and passive (diffusive) sampling methods for formaldehyde in pathology and histology laboratories.
Lee EG; Magrm R; Kusti M; Kashon ML; Guffey S; Costas MM; Boykin CJ; Harper M
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2017 Jan; 14(1):31-39. PubMed ID: 27715715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of concurrent personal measurements of acrylonitrile using different sampling techniques.
Zey JN; Stewart PA; Hornung R; Herrick R; McCammon C; Zaebst D; Pottern LM; Dosemeci M; Bloom TF
Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2002 Feb; 17(2):88-95. PubMed ID: 11843203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance testing of NIOSH Method 5524/ASTM Method D-7049-04, for determination of metalworking fluids.
Glaser R; Kurimo R; Shulman S
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Aug; 4(8):583-95. PubMed ID: 17577749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of various passive monitors and active monitors for industrial hygiene sampling.
Nothstein GL; Hahne RM; Spence MW
AIHAJ; 2000; 61(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 10772616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Worker exposures to nitrosamines in a rubber vehicle sealing plant.
Reh BD; Fajen JM
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1996 Oct; 57(10):918-23. PubMed ID: 8865601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Experience in the use of the NIOSH diffusive sampler evaluation protocol.
Harper M; Guild LV
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1996 Dec; 57(12):1115-23. PubMed ID: 8976586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
