These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9859471)

  • 21. A novel breast software phantom for biomechanical modeling of elastography.
    Bhatti SN; Sridhar-Keralapura M
    Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):1748-68. PubMed ID: 22482599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Wideband holographic three-dimensional ultrasonic imaging of breast and liver phantoms.
    Sheen DM; Collins HD; Gribble RP
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1996; 29():461-70. PubMed ID: 10163776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Diagnostic performance of quantitative shear wave elastography in the evaluation of solid breast masses: determination of the most discriminatory parameter.
    Au FW; Ghai S; Moshonov H; Kahn H; Brennan C; Dua H; Crystal P
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):W328-36. PubMed ID: 25148191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Silicone breast phantoms for elastographic imaging evaluation.
    Kashif AS; Lotz TF; McGarry MD; Pattison AJ; Chase JG
    Med Phys; 2013 Jun; 40(6):063503. PubMed ID: 23718614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. First step to facilitate long-term and multi-centre studies of shear wave elastography in solid breast lesions using a computer-assisted algorithm.
    Skerl K; Cochran S; Evans A
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 Sep; 12(9):1533-1542. PubMed ID: 28478519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Multicenter study of ultrasound real-time tissue elastography in 779 cases for the assessment of breast lesions: improved diagnostic performance by combining the BI-RADS®-US classification system with sonoelastography.
    Wojcinski S; Farrokh A; Weber S; Thomas A; Fischer T; Slowinski T; Schmidt W; Degenhardt F
    Ultraschall Med; 2010 Oct; 31(5):484-91. PubMed ID: 20408116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A semi-automated 3-D annotation method for breast ultrasound imaging: system development and feasibility study on phantoms.
    Jiang WW; Li AH; Zheng YP
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Feb; 40(2):434-46. PubMed ID: 24315389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Ultrasound computed tomography in breast imaging: first clinical results of a custom-made scanner.
    Hollenhorst M; Hansen C; Hüttebräuker N; Schasse A; Heuser L; Ermert H; Schulte-Altedorneburg G
    Ultraschall Med; 2010 Dec; 31(6):604-9. PubMed ID: 20614411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Three-dimensional ultrasound imaging of benign and malignant breast tumors--initial clinical experiences].
    Sohn CH; Stolz W; Kaufmann M; Bastert G
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1992 Sep; 52(9):520-5. PubMed ID: 1397952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Laser optoacoustic imaging system for detection of breast cancer.
    Ermilov SA; Khamapirad T; Conjusteau A; Leonard MH; Lacewell R; Mehta K; Miller T; Oraevsky AA
    J Biomed Opt; 2009; 14(2):024007. PubMed ID: 19405737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Dynamic frame pairing in real-time freehand elastography.
    Xia R; Tao G; Thittai AK
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2014 Jun; 61(6):979-85. PubMed ID: 24859661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Building a virtual simulation platform for quasistatic breast ultrasound elastography using open source software: A preliminary investigation.
    Wang Y; Helminen E; Jiang J
    Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 42(9):5453-66. PubMed ID: 26328994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Application of an art algorithm in an experimental study of ultrasonic diffraction tomography.
    Ladas KT; Devaney AJ
    Ultrason Imaging; 1993 Jan; 15(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 8328119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An intraoperative 3D ultrasound system for tumor margin determination in breast cancer surgery.
    DeJean P; Brackstone M; Fenster A
    Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):564-70. PubMed ID: 20229864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Enhancing Your Acoustics: Ultrasound Image Optimization of Breast Lesions.
    Carpentier B; Hayward J; Strachowski L
    J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Jul; 36(7):1479-1485. PubMed ID: 28390169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Twente Photoacoustic Mammoscope: system overview and performance.
    Manohar S; Kharine A; van Hespen JC; Steenbergen W; van Leeuwen TG
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jun; 50(11):2543-57. PubMed ID: 15901953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Imaging results of multi-modal ultrasound computerized tomography system designed for breast diagnosis.
    Opieliński KJ; Pruchnicki P; Gudra T; Podgórski P; Kurcz J; Kraśnicki T; Sąsiadek M; Majewski J
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2015 Dec; 46 Pt 2():83-94. PubMed ID: 25759234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Ultrasound elastography based on multiscale estimations of regularized displacement fields.
    Pellot-Barakat C; Frouin F; Insana MF; Herment A
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Feb; 23(2):153-63. PubMed ID: 14964561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Ultrasound guiding device: suggestions for further improvements.
    Han DH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Apr; 194(4):W349; author reply W350. PubMed ID: 20308480
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Computer-assisted assessment of ultrasound real-time elastography: initial experience in 145 breast lesions.
    Zhang X; Xiao Y; Zeng J; Qiu W; Qian M; Wang C; Zheng R; Zheng H
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jan; 83(1):e1-7. PubMed ID: 24148563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.