224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9859534)
21. Comparison the Diagnostic Value of Dilatation and Curettage Versus Endometrial Biopsy by Pipelle--a Clinical Trial.
Sanam M; Majid MM
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(12):4971-5. PubMed ID: 26163624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Hysteroscopic diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma].
Lazarov L; Mang'rova S; Lazarov N
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2001; 41 Suppl 4():25-7. PubMed ID: 11519319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Diagnostic accuracy of endometrial curettage in endometrial pathology.
Saadia A; Mubarik A; Zubair A; Jamal S; Zafar A
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2011; 23(1):129-31. PubMed ID: 22830167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging for staging endometrial cancer. A prospective study of 100 cases at the Dorset Cancer Centre.
Ortashi O; Jain S; Emannuel O; Henry R; Wood A; Evans J
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Apr; 137(2):232-5. PubMed ID: 17537566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Ultrasound, hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy in the investigation of endometrial cancer.
Symonds I
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2001 Jun; 15(3):381-91. PubMed ID: 11476560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Hysteroscopic staging of endometrial cancer. Comment on the contribution by R. Schild, Th. Kutter].
Kimmig R; Hasbargen U; Hepp H
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1993 Jun; 53(6):433-4. PubMed ID: 8330720
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Clinical factors affecting the diagnostic accuracy of assessing dilation and curettage vs frozen section specimens for histologic grade and depth of myometrial invasion in endometrial carcinoma.
Wang X; Zhang H; Di W; Li W
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Aug; 201(2):194.e1-194.e10. PubMed ID: 19564019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of D&C and office endometrial biopsy in predicting final histopathologic grade in endometrial cancer.
Larson DM; Johnson KK; Broste SK; Krawisz BR; Kresl JJ
Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jul; 86(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 7784020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Prediction of cervical involvement in endometrial cancer by hysteroscopy.
Almog B; Gutman G; Lessing JB; Grisaru D
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Jan; 275(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 16906402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Outcome of fertility-preserving treatment in young women with endometrial carcinomas.
Niwa K; Tagami K; Lian Z; Onogi K; Mori H; Tamaya T
BJOG; 2005 Mar; 112(3):317-20. PubMed ID: 15713146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Liquid-based endometrial cytology: cyto-histological correlation in a population of 917 women.
Buccoliero AM; Gheri CF; Castiglione F; Garbini F; Barbetti A; Fambrini M; Bargelli G; Pappalardo S; Taddei A; Boddi V; Scarselli GF; Marchionni M; Taddei GL
Cytopathology; 2007 Aug; 18(4):241-9. PubMed ID: 17559564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis and staging of endometrial carcinoma].
Bao R; Wu A; Ou Y
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1995 Apr; 30(4):215-7. PubMed ID: 7664607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Accuracy of hysteroscopic biopsy, compared to dilation and curettage, as a predictor of final pathology in patients with endometrial cancer.
Su H; Huang L; Huang KG; Yen CF; Han CM; Lee CL
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Dec; 54(6):757-60. PubMed ID: 26700998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Office hysteroscopy and the risk of microscopic extrauterine spread in endometrial cancer.
Takac I; Zegura B
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Oct; 107(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 17610939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Incidence of endometrial carcinoma after hysterectomy for atypical hyperplasia or FIGO stage IA carcinoma diagnosed on endometrial biopsy or endometrial resection].
Ploteau S; Squifflet JL; Berlière M; Marbaix E; Donnez J
Bull Cancer; 2008 May; 95(5):556-62. PubMed ID: 18541521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Complex atypical hyperplasia of the uterus: characteristics and prediction of underlying carcinoma risk.
Leitao MM; Han G; Lee LX; Abu-Rustum NR; Brown CL; Chi DS; Sonoda Y; Levine DA; Gardner GJ; Jewell EE; Barakat RR; Soslow RA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Oct; 203(4):349.e1-6. PubMed ID: 20576254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Tumor Grade Correlation Between Preoperative Biopsy and Final Surgical Specimen in Endometrial Cancer: The Use of Different Diagnostic Methods and Analysis of Associated Factors.
Lago V; Martín B; Ballesteros E; Cárdenas-Rebollo JM; Minig L
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2018 Sep; 28(7):1258-1263. PubMed ID: 29994910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Endometrial brush biopsy for the diagnosis of endometrial cancer.
Del Priore G; Williams R; Harbatkin CB; Wan LS; Mittal K; Yang GC
J Reprod Med; 2001 May; 46(5):439-43. PubMed ID: 11396369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Use of the sentinel node procedure to stage endometrial cancer.
Ballester M; Dubernard G; Rouzier R; Barranger E; Darai E
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 May; 15(5):1523-9. PubMed ID: 18322758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The role of Pipelle Mark II sampling in endometrial disease diagnosis.
Polena V; Mergui JL; Zerat L; Sananes S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Oct; 134(2):233-7. PubMed ID: 17029754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
