231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9859885)
1. FO processing and the separation of competing speech signals by listeners with normal hearing and with hearing loss.
Summers V; Leek MR
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1998 Dec; 41(6):1294-306. PubMed ID: 9859885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Role of fundamental frequency differences in the perceptual separation of competing vowel sounds by listeners with normal hearing and listeners with hearing loss.
Arehart KH; King CA; McLean-Mudgett KS
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Dec; 40(6):1434-44. PubMed ID: 9430762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Double-vowel perception in listeners with cochlear hearing loss: differences in fundamental frequency, ear of presentation, and relative amplitude.
Arehart KH; Rossi-Katz J; Swensson-Prutsman J
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Feb; 48(1):236-52. PubMed ID: 15938067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of cochlear hearing loss on perceptual grouping cues in competing-vowel perception.
Rossi-Katz JA; Arehart KH
J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Oct; 118(4):2588-98. PubMed ID: 16266179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An Alternative Explanation for Difficulties with Speech in Background Talkers: Abnormal Fusion of Vowels Across Fundamental Frequency and Ears.
Reiss LAJ; Molis MR
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2021 Jul; 22(4):443-461. PubMed ID: 33877470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Brainstem correlates of concurrent speech identification in adverse listening conditions.
Yellamsetty A; Bidelman GM
Brain Res; 2019 Jul; 1714():182-192. PubMed ID: 30796895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Perception of temporally processed speech by listeners with hearing impairment.
Calandruccio L; Doherty KA; Carney LH; Kikkeri HN
Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):512-23. PubMed ID: 17609613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of two voice-separation algorithms using normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Stubbs RJ; Summerfield Q
J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Oct; 84(4):1236-49. PubMed ID: 3198862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of Hearing Loss on School-Aged Children's Ability to Benefit From F0 Differences Between Target and Masker Speech.
Flaherty MM; Browning J; Buss E; Leibold LJ
Ear Hear; 2021; 42(4):1084-1096. PubMed ID: 33538428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The time course of auditory segregation: concurrent vowels that vary in duration.
McKeown JD; Patterson RD
J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Oct; 98(4):1866-77. PubMed ID: 7593912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimum spectral contrast for vowel identification by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Leek MR; Dorman MF; Summerfield Q
J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Jan; 81(1):148-54. PubMed ID: 3819173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Spectral contributions to the benefit from spatial separation of speech and noise.
Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB; Horwitz AR
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Dec; 45(6):1297-310. PubMed ID: 12546495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of age on concurrent vowel perception in acoustic and simulated electroacoustic hearing.
Arehart KH; Souza PE; Muralimanohar RK; Miller CW
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Feb; 54(1):190-210. PubMed ID: 20689036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of talker differences on vowel identification by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Nábĕlek AK; Czyzewski Z; Krishnan LA
J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Sep; 92(3):1228-46. PubMed ID: 1401512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of age on F0 difference limen and concurrent vowel identification.
Vongpaisal T; Pichora-Fuller MK
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Oct; 50(5):1139-56. PubMed ID: 17905901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pitches of concurrent vowels.
Assmann PF; Paschall DD
J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Feb; 103(2):1150-60. PubMed ID: 9479768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of reduced audible bandwidth on asynchronous double-vowel identification.
Valentine S; Lentz JJ
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Dec; 55(6):1750-64. PubMed ID: 22615479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Envelope following responses elicited by English sentences.
Choi JM; Purcell DW; Coyne JA; Aiken SJ
Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):637-50. PubMed ID: 23575462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of age and hearing loss on concurrent vowel identification.
Chintanpalli A; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Dec; 140(6):4142. PubMed ID: 28040038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
