BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9859974)

  • 1. Allow cloning in embryo research, says UK report.
    Loder N
    Nature; 1998 Dec; 396(6711):503. PubMed ID: 9859974
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. UK consults public on clones for research.
    Dickson D
    Nature; 1998 Feb; 391(6667):523. PubMed ID: 9468125
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Expert group to look at UK cloning law.
    Masood E
    Nature; 1999 Jul; 400(6739):4. PubMed ID: 10403235
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Human embryonic cloning.
    Bruce D
    Hum Reprod Genet Ethics; 2001; 7(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 16639815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Public consultation on human cloning launched.
    Bower H
    BMJ; 1998 Feb; 316(7129):411. PubMed ID: 9492655
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. UK authorities recommend human cloning for therapeutic research.
    Mayor S
    BMJ; 1998 Dec; 317(7173):1613. PubMed ID: 11645133
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Consultation rejects human reproductive cloning.
    Human Genetics Advisory Commission
    Hum Reprod Genet Ethics; 1999; 5(2):21-3. PubMed ID: 12156806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Call to strengthen UK ban on human clones.
    Ramsay S
    Lancet; 1998 Dec; 352(9144):1917. PubMed ID: 11657091
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Britain urged to expand embryo studies.
    Marshall E
    Science; 1998 Dec; 282(5397):2167-8. PubMed ID: 9890819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stem cells, Superman, and the report of the Select Committee.
    Brownsword R
    Mod Law Rev; 2002 Jul; 65(4):568-87. PubMed ID: 15212071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cloning human embryos for spare tissue: an ethical dilemma.
    Bruce D
    Hum Reprod Genet Ethics; 2002; 8(2):22-3. PubMed ID: 12731560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Scientists react to government indecision.
    Brown P
    Nat Med; 1999 Aug; 5(8):855-6. PubMed ID: 10426295
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Totipotent and differentiated cells: an ethical difference for therapeutic cloning?
    MacKellar C
    Biomed Ethics; 2000; 5(3):115-9. PubMed ID: 12755114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Embryo research. British Parliament approves new rules.
    Vogel G
    Science; 2001 Jan; 291(5501):23. PubMed ID: 11191989
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. UK embryo research law 'may need changes'.
    Dickson D
    Nature; 1997 Mar; 386(6621):98. PubMed ID: 9062171
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stem cell studies advance in Britain.
    Wade N
    N Y Times Web; 2001 Aug; ():A1, A14. PubMed ID: 12155135
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. UK public consulted on ethics of human cloning.
    Ramsay S
    Lancet; 1998 Feb; 351(9100):427. PubMed ID: 11655347
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How to talk about cloning without talking about cloning: public discourse in the UK.
    Sexton S
    Biomed Ethics; 2000; 5(3):106-14. PubMed ID: 12755112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cloning technique 'reveals legal loophole'.
    Masood E
    Nature; 1997 Feb; 385(6619):757. PubMed ID: 9039895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Loophole legalizes human cloning.
    Adam D
    Nature; 2001 Nov; 414(6862):381. PubMed ID: 11719761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.