110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9861528)
1. Evaluation of automated systems for the analysis of cervical smears.
Coleman DV
Cytopathology; 1998 Dec; 9(6):359-68. PubMed ID: 9861528
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Detection of laboratory false negative smears by the PAPNET cytologic screening system.
Mitchell H; Medley G
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):265-70. PubMed ID: 9479350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automated rescreening in cervical cytology. Mathematical models for evaluating overall process sensitivity, specificity and cost.
Kaminsky FC; Benneyan JC; Mullins DL
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):209-23. PubMed ID: 9022745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Neuromedical Systems, Inc.
Mango LJ
Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 8604575
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Automation in cervical cytology: whose cost and whose benefit?
Wain GV
Med J Aust; 1997 Nov; 167(9):460-1. PubMed ID: 9397056
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. PAPNET Testing System. Technical update.
Denaro TJ; Herriman JM; Shapira O
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 9022728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Simulation of primary cervical cancer screening by the PAPNET system in an unscreened, high-risk community.
Michelow PM; Hlongwane NF; Leiman G
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 9022732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automation of primary screening for cervical cancer. Sooner or later?
Bartels PH; Vooijs GP
Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 9987443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality assurance in cervical cytology screening. Comparison of rapid rescreening and the PAPNET Testing System.
Halford JA; Wright RG; Ditchmen EJ
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):79-81. PubMed ID: 9022730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Proposed guidelines for secondary screening (rescreening) instruments for gynecologic cytology. Intersociety Working Group for Cytology Technologies.
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):273-6. PubMed ID: 9479352
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Whatever happened to cervical cytology automation?
Tucker J; Stenkvist B
Anal Cell Pathol; 1990 Jul; 2(4):259-66. PubMed ID: 2275872
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Detection of unsuspected abnormalities by PAPNET-assisted review.
Mitchell H; Medley G
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):260-4. PubMed ID: 9479349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stanley F. Patten, Jr., M.D., Ph.D. and the development of an automated Papanicolaou smear screening system.
Lee JS; Nelson AC
Cancer; 1997 Dec; 81(6):332-6. PubMed ID: 9438457
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Autofocusing for automated microscopic evaluation of blood smear and pap smear.
Liu XY; Wang WH; Sun Y
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():4718-21. PubMed ID: 17946258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Automated screening for cervical cancer: diagnostic decision procedures.
Bartels PH; Wied GL
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 9022719
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Screening of cervical cancer: where do we go from here?
Kuo DY; Goldberg GL
Cancer Invest; 2003; 21(1):157-61. PubMed ID: 12643017
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of automated technology on the cervical cytologic smear. A comparison of cost.
Grohs DH
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):165-70. PubMed ID: 9479335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of automated primary screening on PAPNET of cervical smears in the PRISMATIC trial. PRISMATIC Project Management Team.
Lancet; 1999 Apr; 353(9162):1381-5. PubMed ID: 10227217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Can microcolpohysteroscopy be used to screen cervical lesions?].
Hamou J; Frydman R; Fernandez H; Capella S; Taylor S
Contracept Fertil Sex; 1997 May; 25(5):358-62. PubMed ID: 9273106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Automation of the Papanicolaou smear: a technology assessment perspective.
Linder J
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar; 121(3):282-6. PubMed ID: 9111119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
