151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9861621)
1. Can dual-headed 18F-FDG SPET imaging reliably supersede PET in clinical oncology? A comparative study in lung and gastrointestinal tract cancer.
Lonneux M; Delval D; Bausart R; Moens R; Willockx R; Van Mael P; Declerck P; Jamar F; Zreik H; Pauwels S
Nucl Med Commun; 1998 Nov; 19(11):1047-54. PubMed ID: 9861621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of l-3-[123I]iodo-alpha-methyltyrosine SPET and [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET in the detection and grading of recurrences in patients pretreated for gliomas at follow-up: a comparative study with stereotactic biopsy.
Bader JB; Samnick S; Moringlane JR; Feiden W; Schaefer A; Kremp S; Kirsch CM
Eur J Nucl Med; 1999 Feb; 26(2):144-51. PubMed ID: 9933348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differentiation between recurrent brain tumour and post-radiation necrosis: the value of 201Tl SPET versus 18F-FDG PET using a dual-headed coincidence camera--a pilot study.
Stokkel M; Stevens H; Taphoorn M; Van Rijk P
Nucl Med Commun; 1999 May; 20(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 10404525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of high-risk melanoma: comparison of [18F]FDG PET and high-dose 67Ga SPET.
Kalff V; Hicks RJ; Ware RE; Greer B; Binns DS; Hogg A
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2002 Apr; 29(4):506-15. PubMed ID: 11914889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of whole-body 18F-FDG PET, 99mTc-MIBI SPET, and post-therapeutic 131I-Na scintigraphy in the detection of metastatic thyroid cancer.
Iwata M; Kasagi K; Misaki T; Matsumoto K; Iida Y; Ishimori T; Nakamoto Y; Higashi T; Saga T; Konishi J
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2004 Apr; 31(4):491-8. PubMed ID: 14666387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Gamma-camera 18F-FDG PET in diagnosis and staging of patients presenting with suspected lung cancer and comparison with dedicated PET.
Oturai PS; Mortensen J; Enevoldsen H; Eigtved A; Backer V; Olesen KP; Nielsen HW; Hansen H; Stentoft P; Friberg L
J Nucl Med; 2004 Aug; 45(8):1351-7. PubMed ID: 15299061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Imaging of lung cancer with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose: comparison of a dual-head gamma camera in coincidence mode with a full-ring positron emission tomography system.
Weber WA; Neverve J; Sklarek J; Ziegler SI; Bartenstein P; King B; Treumann T; Enterrottacher A; Krapf M; Häussinger KE; Lichte H; Präuer HW; Thetter O; Schwaiger M
Eur J Nucl Med; 1999 Apr; 26(4):388-95. PubMed ID: 10199945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Oncologic diagnosis with 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose imaging: dual-head coincidence gamma camera versus positron emission tomographic scanner.
Shreve PD; Steventon RS; Deters EC; Kison PV; Gross MD; Wahl RL
Radiology; 1998 May; 207(2):431-7. PubMed ID: 9577492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 11C-acetate PET imaging of lung cancer: comparison with 18F-FDG PET and 99mTc-MIBI SPET.
Higashi K; Ueda Y; Matsunari I; Kodama Y; Ikeda R; Miura K; Taki S; Higuchi T; Tonami H; Yamamoto I
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2004 Jan; 31(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 14574513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose PET/Computed Tomography in Gastrointestinal Malignancies.
Donswijk ML; Hess S; Mulders T; Lam MG
PET Clin; 2014 Oct; 9(4):421-41, v-vi. PubMed ID: 26050945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. FDG PET and immunoscintigraphy with 99mTc-labeled antibody fragments for detection of the recurrence of colorectal carcinoma.
Willkomm P; Bender H; Bangard M; Decker P; Grünwald F; Biersack HJ
J Nucl Med; 2000 Oct; 41(10):1657-63. PubMed ID: 11037995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [[18F]-FDG-PET in the diagnostics of gastrointestinal tumors].
Buchmann I; Ganten TM; Haberkorn U
Z Gastroenterol; 2008 Apr; 46(4):367-75. PubMed ID: 18393156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fever of unknown origin: prospective comparison of [18F]FDG imaging with a double-head coincidence camera and gallium-67 citrate SPET.
Meller J; Altenvoerde G; Munzel U; Jauho A; Behe M; Gratz S; Luig H; Becker W
Eur J Nucl Med; 2000 Nov; 27(11):1617-25. PubMed ID: 11105817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preoperative assessment of cervical lymph nodes in head and neck cancer with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose using a dual-head coincidence camera: a pilot study.
Stokkel MP; ten Broek FW; van Rijk PP
Eur J Nucl Med; 1999 May; 26(5):499-503. PubMed ID: 10382094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Whole-body hybrid PET with 18F-FDG in the staging of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Tatsumi M; Kitayama H; Sugahara H; Tokita N; Nakamura H; Kanakura Y; Nishimura T
J Nucl Med; 2001 Apr; 42(4):601-8. PubMed ID: 11337549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of fluorine-18-FDG PET and thallium-201 SPECT in evaluation of lung cancer.
Higashi K; Nishikawa T; Seki H; Oguchi M; Nambu Y; Ueda Y; Yuasa K; Tonami H; Okimura T; Yamamoto I
J Nucl Med; 1998 Jan; 39(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 9443730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Non-invasive grading of primary brain tumours: results of a comparative study between SPET with 123I-alpha-methyl tyrosine and PET with 18F-deoxyglucose.
Woesler B; Kuwert T; Morgenroth C; Matheja P; Palkovic S; Schäfers M; Vollet B; Schäfers K; Lerch H; Brandau W; Samnick S; Wassmann H; Schober O
Eur J Nucl Med; 1997 Apr; 24(4):428-34. PubMed ID: 9096095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Feasibility of fluorodeoxyglucose dual-head gamma camera coincidence imaging in the evaluation of lung cancer: comparison with FDG PET.
Tatsumi M; Yutani K; Watanabe Y; Miyoshi S; Tomiyama N; Johkoh T; Kusuoka H; Nakamura H; Nishimura T
J Nucl Med; 1999 Apr; 40(4):566-73. PubMed ID: 10210214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of a dual-head coincidence camera and 18F-FDG for detection and nodal staging of non-small cell lung cancer: accuracy as determined by 2 independent observers.
Stevens H; Bakker PF; Schlösser NJ; van Rijk PP; de Klerk JM
J Nucl Med; 2003 Mar; 44(3):336-40. PubMed ID: 12620997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
