These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9862087)

  • 1. Multiple variable interval schedule behaviour in humans: effects of ethanol, mood, and reinforcer size on responding maintained by monetary reinforcement.
    Glautier S; Bankart J; Rigney U; Willner P
    Behav Pharmacol; 1998 Nov; 9(7):619-30. PubMed ID: 9862087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ethanol's effects on operant responding: differentiating reinforcement efficacy and motor performance.
    Petry NM
    Physiol Behav; 1998 Apr; 64(1):117-22. PubMed ID: 9661991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Independent ethanol- and sucrose-maintained responding on a multiple schedule of reinforcement.
    Czachowski CL; Samson HH; Denning CE
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 1999 Mar; 23(3):398-403. PubMed ID: 10195809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantification of ethanol's antipunishment effect in humans using the generalized matching equation.
    Rasmussen EB; Newland MC
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2009 Sep; 92(2):161-80. PubMed ID: 20354597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dopaminergic and opiate agonists and antagonists differentially decrease multiple schedule responding maintained by sucrose/ethanol and sucrose.
    Slawecki CJ; Hodge CW; Samson HH
    Alcohol; 1997; 14(3):281-94. PubMed ID: 9160806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of ethanol reinforcement in 1-day-old rats: assessment through a brief and novel operant procedure.
    Bordner KA; Molina JC; Spear NE
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2008 Apr; 32(4):580-92. PubMed ID: 18366451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Increasing and signaling background reinforcement: effect on the foreground response-reinforcer relation.
    Belke TW; Heyman GM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1994 Jan; 61(1):65-81. PubMed ID: 8126392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reduced ethanol self-administration in rats produced by the introduction of a high value non-drug alternative reinforcer.
    Kim JS; Kearns DN
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2019 Sep; 184():172744. PubMed ID: 31351907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fetal exposure to moderate ethanol doses: heightened operant responsiveness elicited by ethanol-related reinforcers.
    March SM; Abate P; Spear NE; Molina JC
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2009 Nov; 33(11):1981-93. PubMed ID: 19719792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ethanol-maintained responding of rats is more resistant to change in a context with added non-drug reinforcement.
    Shahan TA; Burke KA
    Behav Pharmacol; 2004 Jul; 15(4):279-85. PubMed ID: 15252278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of morphine on responding under variable-interval schedules: rate-related effects, behavioral mechanisms and Herrnstein's hyperbola.
    Lancaster JS; Dallery J
    Behav Pharmacol; 1999 Jul; 10(4):337-47. PubMed ID: 10780802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ethanol as a positive reinforcer via the oral route for rhesus monkeys: maintenance of fixed-ratio responding.
    Henningfield JE; Meisch RA
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1976 Apr; 4(4):473-5. PubMed ID: 819942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Human performance on a two-alternative rapid-acquisition choice task.
    Lie C; Harper DN; Hunt M
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):244-9. PubMed ID: 19015013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Infantile sensitivity to ethanol's motivational effects: Ethanol reinforcement during the third postnatal week.
    Molina JC; Ponce LF; Truxell E; Spear NE
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2006 Sep; 30(9):1506-19. PubMed ID: 16930213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Studies of wheel-running reinforcement: parameters of Herrnstein's (1970) response-strength equation vary with schedule order.
    Belke TW
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 May; 73(3):319-31. PubMed ID: 10866355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Time-, schedule-, and reinforcer-dependent effects of pimozide and amphetamine.
    Phillips G; Willner P; Sampson D; Nunn J; Muscat R
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1991; 104(1):125-31. PubMed ID: 1881998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of adding a second reinforcement alternative: implications for Herrnstein's interpretation of r(e).
    Soto PL; McDowell JJ; Dallery J
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Sep; 84(2):185-225. PubMed ID: 16262186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Operant responding controlled by milk or milk contaminated with alcohol as positive reinforcers in infant rats.
    Dominguez HD; Bocco G; Chotro MG; Spear NE; Molina JC
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1993 Feb; 44(2):403-9. PubMed ID: 8446672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gestational exposure to methylmercury retards choice in transition in aging rats.
    Newland MC; Reile PA; Langston JL
    Neurotoxicol Teratol; 2004; 26(2):179-94. PubMed ID: 15019952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sensitivity to relative reinforcer rate in concurrent schedules: independence from relative and absolute reinforcer duration.
    McLean AP; Blampied NM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Jan; 75(1):25-42. PubMed ID: 11256865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.