These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9863443)

  • 21. Comparative quantitative and qualitative assessment of the marginal adaptation and apposition of bonded amalgam restorations using luting glass ionomer and 4-META adhesive liner under a scanning electron microscope. An in vitro study.
    Abraham MM; Sudeep PT; Bhat KS
    Indian J Dent Res; 1999; 10(2):43-53. PubMed ID: 10865391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Microleakage of a consolidated silver direct filling material.
    Eichmiller FC; Giuseppetti AA; Hoffman KM; Brajdic DR; Miksch V; Delorey-Lytle JA
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):162-71. PubMed ID: 10530278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Microleakage of Class V restorations using two different compomer systems: an in vitro study.
    Estafan D; Pines MS; Erakin C; Fuerst PF
    J Clin Dent; 1999; 10(4):124-6. PubMed ID: 10825860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. In vitro evaluation of marginal leakage of corrosion-resistant amalgam alloy.
    Andrews JT; Hembree JH
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1975; 42(5):367-70. PubMed ID: 1100692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Clinical evaluation and marginal leakage of Amalgambond Plus: three-year results.
    Olmez A; Cula S; Ulusu T
    Quintessence Int; 1997 Oct; 28(10):651-6. PubMed ID: 9477885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Volumetric microleakage assessment of glass-ionomer-resin composite hybrid materials.
    de Magalhães CS; Serra MC; Rodrigues Júnior AL
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Feb; 30(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 10356563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Microleakage and retention of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Winkler MM; Moore BK; Rhodes B; Swartz M
    Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):245-50. PubMed ID: 11764110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of a resin-based desensitizing agent and a self-etching dentin adhesive on marginal leakage of amalgam restorations.
    Ghavamnasiri M; Alavi M; Alavi S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Nov; 8(7):54-61. PubMed ID: 17994155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Addition of fresh amalgam to existing amalgam: microleakage study.
    Leelawat C; Scherer W; Chang J; Schulman A; Vijayaraghavan T
    J Esthet Dent; 1992; 4(2):41-5. PubMed ID: 1389341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Marginal leakage of restorations using a glass-ionomer liner in bonding composite resins to dentin.
    Hembree JH; Tindle RR; Strange C
    Miss Dent Assoc J; 1990; 46(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 2197543
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Microleakage evaluation in amalgam restorations used with bases.
    Wieczkowski G; Yu XY; Joynt RB; Davis EL
    J Esthet Dent; 1992; 4(2):37-40. PubMed ID: 1389340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Adhesive liner incorporation in dental amalgam restorations.
    Boston DW
    Quintessence Int; 1997 Jan; 28(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 10332355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of thickness of flowable resins on marginal leakage in class II composite restorations.
    Malmström HS; Schlueter M; Roach T; Moss ME
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 12120775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effect of different adhesive systems on the retention strength of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Ghavamnasiri M; Moosavi H
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Feb; 9(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 18264531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. In vitro microleakage of luting cements and crown foundation material.
    Lindquist TJ; Connolly J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 11264938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Microleakage in alloy-glass ionomer lined amalgam restorations after thermocycling.
    Arcoria CJ; Fisher MA; Wagner MJ
    J Oral Rehabil; 1991 Jan; 18(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 2051252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Microleakage of Class II box-type composite restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Roeters JJ; Burgersdijk RC
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):160-4. PubMed ID: 10388369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Postoperative sensitivity: bonded cavity liners revisited.
    Leinfelder KF; Freedman G; Pakroo JS
    Dent Today; 2001 Nov; 20(11):82-7. PubMed ID: 11715657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Debonding of adhesively restored deep Class II MOD restorations after functional loading.
    Ausiello P; Davidson CL; Cascone P; DeGee AJ; Rengo S
    Am J Dent; 1999 Apr; 12(2):84-8. PubMed ID: 10477988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. SEM and microleakage evaluation of the marginal integrity of two types of class V restorations with or without the use of a light-curable coating material and of polishing.
    Magni E; Zhang L; Hickel R; Bossù M; Polimeni A; Ferrari M
    J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):885-91. PubMed ID: 18757129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.