These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9863447)

  • 1. Influence of air-abrasion treatment on the interfacial bond between composite and dentin.
    Hannig M; Femerling T
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(5):258-65. PubMed ID: 9863447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of etching agent on dentinal adhesive interface in primary teeth.
    Rontani RM; Ducatti CH; Garcia-Godoy F; De Goes MF
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000; 24(3):205-9. PubMed ID: 11314144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bond strength of composite to dentin treated by air abrasion.
    Manhart J; Mehl A; Schroeter R; Obster B; Hickel R
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(4):223-32. PubMed ID: 10823068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
    Setien VJ; Cobb DS; Denehy GE; Vargas MA
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bond strength of composite to air-abraded enamel and dentin.
    Roeder LB; Berry EA; You C; Powers JM
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(5):186-90. PubMed ID: 8710697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bond strengths of resin to enamel and dentin treated with low-pressure air abrasion.
    Nikaido T; Kataumi M; Burrow MF; Inokoshi S; Yamada T; Takatsu T
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(5):218-24. PubMed ID: 9484176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative in vivo and in vitro investigation of interfacial bond variability.
    Hannig M; Friedrichs C
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 11203774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid: an alternative concept for composite-to-enamel bonding.
    Hannig M; Reinhardt KJ; Bott B
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):172-80. PubMed ID: 10530279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term effect of dentin primers on enamel bond strength and marginal adaptation.
    Frankenberger R; Krämer N; Petschelt A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 11203784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Immediate dentin sealing of onlay preparations: thickness of pre-cured Dentin Bonding Agent and effect of surface cleaning.
    Stavridakis MM; Krejci I; Magne P
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(6):747-57. PubMed ID: 16382598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Directed polymerization shrinkage versus a horizontal incremental filling technique: interfacial adaptation in vivo in Class II cavities.
    van Dijken JW; Hörstedt P; Waern R
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):165-72. PubMed ID: 10388370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of interfacial bond quality on the direction of polymerization shrinkage flow in resin composite restorations.
    Cho BH; Dickens SH; Bae JH; Chang CG; Son HH; Um CM
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 12022463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of multiple application of a dentin adhesive on contraction gap width of a resin-based composite.
    Koike T; Hasegawa T; Itoh K; Yukitani W; Yamashita T; Wakumoto S; Hisamitsu H
    Am J Dent; 2002 Jun; 15(3):159-63. PubMed ID: 12469752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of additional enamel etching and a flowable composite to the interfacial integrity of Class II adhesive composite restorations.
    Belli S; Inokoshi S; Ozer F; Pereira PN; Ogata M; Tagami J
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 11203780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Direct dentin bonding technique sensitivity when using air/suction drying steps.
    Magne P; Mahallati R; Bazos P; So WS
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2008; 20(2):130-8; discussion 139-40. PubMed ID: 18380845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of dentin air abrasion with aluminum oxide and hydroxyapatite on adhesive bond strength.
    Los SA; Barkmeier WW
    Oper Dent; 1994; 19(5):169-75. PubMed ID: 8700756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Resin bond strength and micromorphology of human teeth prepared with an Erbium:YAG laser.
    Trajtenberg CP; Pereira PN; Powers JM
    Am J Dent; 2004 Oct; 17(5):331-6. PubMed ID: 15575443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
    de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of incorrect application of a water-based adhesive system on the marginal adaptation of Class V restorations.
    Peschke A; Blunck U; Roulet JF
    Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):239-44. PubMed ID: 11764109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.