BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9865099)

  • 21. Validity of jitter measures in non-quasi-periodic voices. Part I: perceptual and computer performances in cycle pattern recognition.
    Dejonckere P; Schoentgen J; Giordano A; Fraj S; Bocchi L; Manfredi C
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2011 Jul; 36(2):70-7. PubMed ID: 21689056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The turbulent noise ratio: an estimation of noise power of the breathy voice using PARCOR analysis.
    Mori K; Blaugrund SM; Yu JD
    Laryngoscope; 1994 Feb; 104(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 8302117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Deviant vocal fold vibration as observed during videokymography: the effect on voice quality.
    Verdonck-de Leeuw IM; Festen JM; Mahieu HF
    J Voice; 2001 Sep; 15(3):313-22. PubMed ID: 11575628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Objective voice analysis in dysphonic patients: new data including nonlinear measurements.
    Yu P; Garrel R; Nicollas R; Ouaknine M; Giovanni A
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2007; 59(1):20-30. PubMed ID: 17172783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Suitability of acoustic perturbation measures in analysing periodic and nearly periodic voice signals.
    Ma EP; Yiu EM
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2005; 57(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 15655340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Nasalance: a new concept for objective analysis of nasality].
    Heppt W; Westrich M; Strate B; Möhring L
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1991 Apr; 70(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 2054027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Voice Disorders in Teachers: Clinical, Videolaryngoscopical, and Vocal Aspects.
    Pereira ER; Tavares EL; Martins RH
    J Voice; 2015 Sep; 29(5):564-71. PubMed ID: 25704475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Loud speech in realistic environmental noise: phonetogram data, perceptual voice quality, subjective ratings, and gender differences in healthy speakers.
    Södersten M; Ternström S; Bohman M
    J Voice; 2005 Mar; 19(1):29-46. PubMed ID: 15766848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Acoustic and aerodynamic measurement of speech production after supracricoid partial laryngectomy.
    Makeieff M; Barbotte E; Giovanni A; Guerrier B
    Laryngoscope; 2005 Mar; 115(3):546-51. PubMed ID: 15744175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Validity of jitter measures in non-quasi-periodic voices. Part II: the effect of noise.
    Manfredi C; Giordano A; Schoentgen J; Fraj S; Bocchi L; Dejonckere P
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2011 Jul; 36(2):78-89. PubMed ID: 21609247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Voice abnormalities and their relation with motor dysfunction in Parkinson's disease.
    Midi I; Dogan M; Koseoglu M; Can G; Sehitoglu MA; Gunal DI
    Acta Neurol Scand; 2008 Jan; 117(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 18031561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Development of a minimum protocol for assessment in the paediatric voice clinic. Part 1: evaluating vocal function.
    Cohen W; Wynne DM; Kubba H; McCartney E
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2012 Apr; 37(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 22149459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Clinical evaluation of Parkinson's-related dysphonia.
    Sewall GK; Jiang J; Ford CN
    Laryngoscope; 2006 Oct; 116(10):1740-4. PubMed ID: 17003722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Perceptual and acoustic characteristics of voice changes in reflux laryngitis patients.
    Pribuisiene R; Uloza V; Kupcinskas L; Jonaitis L
    J Voice; 2006 Mar; 20(1):128-36. PubMed ID: 15925484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Integrating voice evaluation: correlation between acoustic and audio-perceptual measures.
    Vaz Freitas S; Melo Pestana P; Almeida V; Ferreira A
    J Voice; 2015 May; 29(3):390.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25619471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Objective vocal evaluation of dysphonia by simultaneous measurement of acoustic and aerodynamic parameters with the EVA device].
    Giovanni A; Estublier N; Robert D; Teston B; Zanaret M; Cannoni M
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1995; 112(3):85-90. PubMed ID: 7486713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Computerized acoustic voice analysis and subjective scaled evaluation of the voice can avoid the need for laryngoscopy after thyroid surgery.
    Ortega J; Cassinello N; Dorcaratto D; Leopaldi E
    Surgery; 2009 Mar; 145(3):265-71. PubMed ID: 19231578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Perceptive and instrumental examination of voice quality in patients with lip-jaw-palate clefts].
    Bressmann T; Sader R; Merk M; Ziegler W; Busch R; Zeilhofer HF; Horch HH
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 Dec; 77(12):700-8. PubMed ID: 10036673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Outcome of laryngeal manual therapy in four Dutch adults with persistent moderate-to-severe vocal hyperfunction: a pilot study.
    Van Lierde KM; De Ley S; Clement G; De Bodt M; Van Cauwenberge P
    J Voice; 2004 Dec; 18(4):467-74. PubMed ID: 15567048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reliability and clinical relevance of perceptual evaluation of pathological voices.
    Dejonckere PH; Remacle M; Fresnel-Elbaz E; Woisard V; Crevier L; Millet B
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1998; 119(4):247-8. PubMed ID: 9865100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.