These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9865100)

  • 1. Reliability and clinical relevance of perceptual evaluation of pathological voices.
    Dejonckere PH; Remacle M; Fresnel-Elbaz E; Woisard V; Crevier L; Millet B
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1998; 119(4):247-8. PubMed ID: 9865100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Differentiated perceptual evaluation of pathological voice quality: reliability and correlations with acoustic measurements.
    Dejonckere PH; Remacle M; Fresnel-Elbaz E; Woisard V; Crevier-Buchman L; Millet B
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1996; 117(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 9102729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of visible speech in the perceptual rating of pathological voices.
    Martens JW; Versnel H; Dejonckere PH
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Feb; 133(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 17309988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical implementation of a multidimensional basic protocol for assessing functional results of voice therapy. A preliminary study.
    Dejonckere PH
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2000; 121(5):311-3. PubMed ID: 11387655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceptual evaluation of voice quality and its correlation with acoustic measurements.
    Bhuta T; Patrick L; Garnett JD
    J Voice; 2004 Sep; 18(3):299-304. PubMed ID: 15331102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The perceptual evaluation of voice disorders.
    De Bodt MS; Van de Heyning PH; Wuyts FL; Lambrechts L
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1996; 50(4):283-91. PubMed ID: 9001637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ceptral voice analysis: link with perception and stroboscopy.
    Dejonckere PH
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1998; 119(4):245-6. PubMed ID: 9865099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Objective voice analysis in dysphonic patients: new data including nonlinear measurements.
    Yu P; Garrel R; Nicollas R; Ouaknine M; Giovanni A
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2007; 59(1):20-30. PubMed ID: 17172783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Characteristics of the voice in patients with glottic carcinoma evaluated with the RBH (Roughness, Breathiness, Hoarseness) and GIRBAS (Grade, Instability, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, Strain) scales].
    Mitrović S
    Med Pregl; 2003; 56(7-8):337-40. PubMed ID: 14587250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new insight into postsurgical objective voice quality evaluation: application to thyroplastic medialization.
    Manfredi C; Peretti G
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Mar; 53(3):442-51. PubMed ID: 16532770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The reliability and sensitivity to change of acoustic measures of voice quality.
    Carding PN; Steen IN; Webb A; MacKenzie K; Deary IJ; Wilson JA
    Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 2004 Oct; 29(5):538-44. PubMed ID: 15373870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of consensus training on the reliability of auditory perceptual ratings of voice quality.
    Iwarsson J; Reinholt Petersen N
    J Voice; 2012 May; 26(3):304-12. PubMed ID: 21840170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Audio-perceptual evaluation of Portuguese voice disorders-an inter- and intrajudge reliability study.
    Vaz Freitas S; Pestana PM; Almeida V; Ferreira A
    J Voice; 2014 Mar; 28(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 24050822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing efficacy of voice treatments: a guideline.
    Dejonckere PH;
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2000; 121(5):307-10. PubMed ID: 11387654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. PC based system for analysis of the voice of patients with laryngeal disease.
    Boyanov B; Doskov D; Ivanov T; Hadjitodorov S
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1991 Nov; 70(11):767-72. PubMed ID: 1782887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Instrumental dimensioning of normal and pathological phonation using acoustic measurements.
    Putzer M; Barry WJ
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2008 Jun; 22(6):407-20. PubMed ID: 18484282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What determines the differences in perceptual rating of dysphonia between experienced raters?
    Millet B; Dejonckere PH
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 1998; 50(6):305-10. PubMed ID: 9925953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory-perceptual evaluation of disordered voice quality: pros, cons and future directions.
    Oates J
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2009; 61(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 19204393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computerized acoustic voice analysis and subjective scaled evaluation of the voice can avoid the need for laryngoscopy after thyroid surgery.
    Ortega J; Cassinello N; Dorcaratto D; Leopaldi E
    Surgery; 2009 Mar; 145(3):265-71. PubMed ID: 19231578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of anchors and training on the reliability of perceptual voice evaluation.
    Chan KM; Yiu EM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Feb; 45(1):111-26. PubMed ID: 14748643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.