295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9865433)
1. Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk.
Boyd NF; Lockwood GA; Byng JW; Tritchler DL; Yaffe MJ
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1998 Dec; 7(12):1133-44. PubMed ID: 9865433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mammographic parenchymal patterns: a marker of breast cancer risk.
Oza AM; Boyd NF
Epidemiol Rev; 1993; 15(1):196-208. PubMed ID: 8405204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mammographic density: a heritable risk factor for breast cancer.
Boyd NF; Martin LJ; Rommens JM; Paterson AD; Minkin S; Yaffe MJ; Stone J; Hopper JL
Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 472():343-60. PubMed ID: 19107441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mammographic density: a hormonally responsive risk factor for breast cancer.
Boyd NF; Martin LJ; Yaffe MJ; Minkin S
J Br Menopause Soc; 2006 Dec; 12(4):186-93. PubMed ID: 17178021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects at two years of a low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet on radiologic features of the breast: results from a randomized trial. Canadian Diet and Breast Cancer Prevention Study Group.
Boyd NF; Greenberg C; Lockwood G; Little L; Martin L; Byng J; Yaffe M; Tritchler D
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1997 Apr; 89(7):488-96. PubMed ID: 9086005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mammographic densities as a marker of human breast cancer risk and their use in chemoprevention.
Boyd NF; Martin LJ; Stone J; Greenberg C; Minkin S; Yaffe MJ
Curr Oncol Rep; 2001 Jul; 3(4):314-21. PubMed ID: 11389815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study.
Boyd NF; Byng JW; Jong RA; Fishell EK; Little LE; Miller AB; Lockwood GA; Tritchler DL; Yaffe MJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1995 May; 87(9):670-5. PubMed ID: 7752271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relationship between mammographic and histological risk factors for breast cancer.
Boyd NF; Jensen HM; Cooke G; Han HL
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1992 Aug; 84(15):1170-9. PubMed ID: 1635085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mammographic parenchymal patterns and quantitative evaluation of mammographic densities: a case-control study.
Wolfe JN; Saftlas AF; Salane M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 Jun; 148(6):1087-92. PubMed ID: 3495132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk.
Boyd NF; Lockwood GA; Martin LJ; Knight JA; Byng JW; Yaffe MJ; Tritchler DL
Breast Dis; 1998 Aug; 10(3-4):113-26. PubMed ID: 15687568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The relationship of "high risk" mammographic patterns to histological risk factors for development of cancer in the human breast.
Arthur JE; Ellis IO; Flowers C; Roebuck E; Elston CW; Blamey RW
Br J Radiol; 1990 Nov; 63(755):845-9. PubMed ID: 2252976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mammographic breast density as an intermediate phenotype for breast cancer.
Boyd NF; Rommens JM; Vogt K; Lee V; Hopper JL; Yaffe MJ; Paterson AD
Lancet Oncol; 2005 Oct; 6(10):798-808. PubMed ID: 16198986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Amount of stroma is associated with mammographic density and stromal expression of oestrogen receptor in normal breast tissues.
Gabrielson M; Chiesa F; Paulsson J; Strell C; Behmer C; Rönnow K; Czene K; Östman A; Hall P
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Jul; 158(2):253-61. PubMed ID: 27349429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A longitudinal study of the effects of menopause on mammographic features.
Boyd N; Martin L; Stone J; Little L; Minkin S; Yaffe M
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2002 Oct; 11(10 Pt 1):1048-53. PubMed ID: 12376506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Image-guided sampling reveals increased stroma and lower glandular complexity in mammographically dense breast tissue.
Lin SJ; Cawson J; Hill P; Haviv I; Jenkins M; Hopper JL; Southey MC; Campbell IG; Thompson EW
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2011 Jul; 128(2):505-16. PubMed ID: 21258862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mammographic density as a risk factor for breast cancer in a low risk population.
Attam A; Kaur N; Saha S; Bhargava SK
Indian J Cancer; 2008; 45(2):50-3. PubMed ID: 18626148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ultrasonographically defined parenchymal patterns of the breast: relationship to mammographic patterns and other risk factors for breast cancer.
Kaizer L; Fishell EK; Hunt JW; Foster FS; Boyd NF
Br J Radiol; 1988 Feb; 61(722):118-24. PubMed ID: 3280068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Growth factors and stromal matrix proteins associated with mammographic densities.
Guo YP; Martin LJ; Hanna W; Banerjee D; Miller N; Fishell E; Khokha R; Boyd NF
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2001 Mar; 10(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 11303594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The risk of breast cancer associated with mammographic parenchymal patterns: a meta-analysis of the published literature to examine the effect of method of classification.
Warner E; Lockwood G; Tritchler D; Boyd NF
Cancer Detect Prev; 1992; 16(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 1532349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Aromatase immunoreactivity is increased in mammographically dense regions of the breast.
Vachon CM; Sasano H; Ghosh K; Brandt KR; Watson DA; Reynolds C; Lingle WL; Goss PE; Li R; Aiyar SE; Scott CG; Pankratz VS; Santen RJ; Ingle JN
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2011 Jan; 125(1):243-52. PubMed ID: 20526739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
