These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9866164)

  • 21. Chamber evaluation of a personal, bioaerosol cyclone sampler.
    Macher J; Chen B; Rao C
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Nov; 5(11):702-12. PubMed ID: 18720289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Air sampling methodology for asphalt fume in asphalt production and asphalt roofing manufacturing facilities: total particulate sampler versus inhalable particulate sampler.
    Calzavara TS; Carter CM; Axten C
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2003 May; 18(5):358-67. PubMed ID: 12746079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A modified Marple-type cascade impactor for assessing aerosol particle size distributions in workplaces.
    Wu YH; Vincent JH
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Oct; 4(10):798-807. PubMed ID: 17763071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of high-volume air sampling equipment for viral aerosol sampling during emergency response.
    Cooper C; Slagley J; Lohaus J; Escamilla E; Bliss C; Semler D; Felker D; Smith D; Ott D
    J Emerg Manag; 2014; 12(2):161-70. PubMed ID: 24828912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of physical sampling efficiency for cyclone-based personal bioaerosol samplers in moving air environments.
    Su WC; Tolchinsky AD; Chen BT; Sigaev VI; Cheng YS
    J Environ Monit; 2012 Sep; 14(9):2430-7. PubMed ID: 22833144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A wind tunnel test of newly developed personal bioaerosol samplers.
    Su WC; Tolchinsky AD; Sigaev VI; Cheng YS
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2012 Jul; 62(7):828-37. PubMed ID: 22866584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of portable, real-time dust monitors sampling actively, with size-selective adaptors, and passively.
    Thorpe A; Walsh PT
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Nov; 51(8):679-91. PubMed ID: 18024485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of a novel personal nanoparticle sampler.
    Zhou Y; Irshad H; Tsai CJ; Hung SM; Cheng YS
    Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2014 Feb; 16(2):203-10. PubMed ID: 24337074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Field evaluation of a personal, bioaerosol cyclone sampler.
    Macher J; Chen B; Rao C
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Nov; 5(11):724-34. PubMed ID: 18780236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of bioaerosol sampling techniques for the detection of Chlamydophila psittaci in contaminated air.
    Van Droogenbroeck C; Van Risseghem M; Braeckman L; Vanrompay D
    Vet Microbiol; 2009 Mar; 135(1-2):31-7. PubMed ID: 18963601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Development and evaluation of an inhalable bioaerosol manifold sampler.
    Gao P; Dillon HK; Farthing WE
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1997 Mar; 58(3):196-206. PubMed ID: 9075310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Field evaluation of personal sampling methods for multiple bioaerosols.
    Wang CH; Chen BT; Han BC; Liu AC; Hung PC; Chen CY; Chao HJ
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0120308. PubMed ID: 25799419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Personal air samplers for measuring occupational exposures to biological hazards.
    Macher JM; First MW
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1984 Feb; 45(2):76-83. PubMed ID: 6702610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A portable vapor/particle sampler.
    Xiong JQ; Fang C; Cohen BS
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1998 Sep; 59(9):614-21. PubMed ID: 9778821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of wood-dust aerosol size-distributions collected by air samplers.
    Harper M; Akbar MZ; Andrew ME
    J Environ Monit; 2004 Jan; 6(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 14737465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Analysis of portable impactor performance for enumeration of viable bioaerosols.
    Yao M; Mainelis G
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Jul; 4(7):514-24. PubMed ID: 17538812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of bioaerosol samplers for the detection and quantification of influenza virus from artificial aerosols and influenza virus-infected ferrets.
    Bekking C; Yip L; Groulx N; Doggett N; Finn M; Mubareka S
    Influenza Other Respir Viruses; 2019 Nov; 13(6):564-573. PubMed ID: 31541519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The suitability of the IOM foam sampler for bioaerosol sampling in Occupational Environments.
    Haatainen S; Laitinen J; Linnainmaa M; Reponen T; Kalliokoski P
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2010 Jan; 7(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 19904652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Thoracic size-selective sampling of fibres: performance of four types of thoracic sampler in laboratory tests.
    Jones AD; Aitken RJ; Fabriès JF; Kauffer E; Liden G; Maynard A; Riediger G; Sahle W
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2005 Aug; 49(6):481-92. PubMed ID: 15790615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A collaborative European study of personal inhalable aerosol sampler performance.
    Kenny LC; Aitken R; Chalmers C; Fabriès JF; Gonzalez-Fernandez E; Kromhout H; Lidén G; Mark D; Riediger G; Prodi V
    Ann Occup Hyg; 1997 Apr; 41(2):135-53. PubMed ID: 9155236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.