145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9866166)
1. Comparison of six respirator fit-test methods with an actual measurement of exposure in a simulated health care environment: Part II--Method comparison testing.
Coffey CC; Campbell DL; Myers WR; Zhuang Z
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1998 Dec; 59(12):862-70. PubMed ID: 9866166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of six respirator fit-test methods with an actual measurement of exposure in a simulated health care environment: Part I--Protocol development.
Coffey CC; Campbell DL; Myers WR; Zhuang Z; Das S
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1998 Dec; 59(12):852-61. PubMed ID: 9866165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of six respirator fit-test methods with an actual measurement of exposure in a simulated health care environment: Part III--Validation.
Coffey CC; Campbell DL; Myers WR
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1999; 60(3):363-6. PubMed ID: 10386357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of performance of three different types of respiratory protection devices.
Lawrence RB; Duling MG; Calvert CA; Coffey CC
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2006 Sep; 3(9):465-74. PubMed ID: 16857645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Simulated workplace protection factors for half-facepiece respiratory protective devices.
Duling MG; Lawrence RB; Slaven JE; Coffey CC
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Jun; 4(6):420-31. PubMed ID: 17474032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of five methods for fit-testing N95 filtering-facepiece respirators.
Coffey CC; Lawrence RB; Zhuang Z; Campbell DL; Jensen PA; Myers WR
Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2002 Oct; 17(10):723-30. PubMed ID: 12363214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Respiratory protection against Mycobacterium tuberculosis: quantitative fit test outcomes for five type N95 filtering-facepiece respirators.
Lee K; Slavcev A; Nicas M
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2004 Jan; 1(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 15202153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Capability of respirator wearers to detect aerosolized qualitative fit test agents (sweetener and Bitrex) with known fixed leaks.
McKay RT; Davies E
Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2000 Jun; 15(6):479-84. PubMed ID: 10853288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of a quantitative fit testing method for N95 filtering facepiece respirators.
Janssen L; Luinenburg MD; Mullins HE; Danisch SG; Nelson TJ
AIHA J (Fairfax, Va); 2003; 64(4):480-6. PubMed ID: 12908863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Determination of known exhalation valve damage using a negative pressure user seal check method on full facepiece respirators.
Delaney LJ; McKay RT; Freeman A
Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2003 Apr; 18(4):237-43. PubMed ID: 12637234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Real-time fit of a respirator during simulated health care tasks.
Hauge J; Roe M; Brosseau LM; Colton C
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2012; 9(10):563-71. PubMed ID: 22924959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fitting characteristics of eighteen N95 filtering-facepiece respirators.
Coffey CC; Lawrence RB; Campbell DL; Zhuang Z; Calvert CA; Jensen PA
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2004 Apr; 1(4):262-71. PubMed ID: 15204866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A feasibility study of quantitative respirator fit testing by controlled negative pressure.
Crutchfield CD; Eroh MP; Van Ert MD
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1991 Apr; 52(4):172-6. PubMed ID: 2069125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance of dust respirators with facial seal leaks: II. Predictive model.
Hinds WC; Bellin P
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1987 Oct; 48(10):842-7. PubMed ID: 3318364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Critical review of international standards for respiratory protective equipment - II. Gas and vapor removal efficiency and fit testing.
Breysse PN; White N; Ryan CM; Corn M
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1983 Oct; 44(10):762-7. PubMed ID: 6650399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of simulated respirator fit factors using aerosol and vapor challenges.
Gardner PD; Hofacre KC; Richardson AW
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2004 Jan; 1(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 15202154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Correlation between quantitative fit factors and workplace protection factors measured in actual workplace environments at a steel foundry.
Zhuang Z; Coffey CC; Jensen PA; Campbell DL; Lawrence RB; Myers WR
AIHA J (Fairfax, Va); 2003; 64(6):730-8. PubMed ID: 14674806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Manikin-based performance evaluation of N95 filtering-facepiece respirators challenged with nanoparticles.
Balazy A; Toivola M; Reponen T; Podgórski A; Zimmer A; Grinshpun SA
Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Apr; 50(3):259-69. PubMed ID: 16344291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of qualitative and quantitative fit-testing results for three commonly used respirators in the healthcare sector.
Hon CY; Danyluk Q; Bryce E; Janssen B; Neudorf M; Yassi A; Shen H; Astrakianakis G
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2017 Mar; 14(3):175-179. PubMed ID: 27717300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of sampling probes for fit testing n95 filtering facepiece respirators.
Bergman MS; Viscusi DJ; Zhuang Z; Newcomb WE
Ann Occup Hyg; 2013 May; 57(4):507-18. PubMed ID: 23258452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
