BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9866167)

  • 1. Methods for assessing the physical demands of manual lifting: a review and case study from warehousing.
    Waters TR; Putz-Anderson V; Baron S
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1998 Dec; 59(12):871-81. PubMed ID: 9866167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effectiveness of commonly used lifting assessment methods to identify industrial jobs associated with elevated risk of low-back disorders.
    Marras WS; Fine LJ; Ferguson SA; Waters TR
    Ergonomics; 1999 Jan; 42(1):229-45. PubMed ID: 9973881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An evaluation of methods assessing the physical demands of manual lifting in scaffolding.
    van der Beek AJ; Erik Mathiassen S; Windhorst J; Burdorf A
    Appl Ergon; 2005 Mar; 36(2):213-22. PubMed ID: 15694076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. New procedure for assessing sequential manual lifting jobs using the revised NIOSH lifting equation.
    Waters TR; Lu ML; Occhipinti E
    Ergonomics; 2007 Nov; 50(11):1761-70. PubMed ID: 17972201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prospective validation of a low-back disorder risk model and assessment of ergonomic interventions associated with manual materials handling tasks.
    Marras WS; Allread WG; Burr DL; Fathallah FA
    Ergonomics; 2000 Nov; 43(11):1866-86. PubMed ID: 11105977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The relationship between low back discomfort ratings and the NIOSH lifting index.
    Wang MJ; Garg A; Chang YC; Shih YC; Yeh WY; Lee CL
    Hum Factors; 1998 Sep; 40(3):509-15. PubMed ID: 9849108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The prevention of risk due to the manual lifting of patients: the psychosocial component].
    Camerino D; Molteni G; Finotti S; Capietti M; Molinari M; Cotroneo L; Morselli G
    Med Lav; 1999; 90(2):412-27. PubMed ID: 10371830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Job re-design, not 'quick fixes,' thwarts many back injury hazards.
    Mahone DB
    Occup Health Saf; 1994 Jan; 63(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 9156425
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Determination of the effect of lift characteristics on dynamic performance profiles during manual materials handling tasks.
    Khalaf KA; Parnianpour M; Sparto PJ; Barin K
    Ergonomics; 1999 Jan; 42(1):126-45. PubMed ID: 9973876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks.
    Waters TR; Putz-Anderson V; Garg A; Fine LJ
    Ergonomics; 1993 Jul; 36(7):749-76. PubMed ID: 8339717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Epidemiology of low-back pain in industry.
    Garg A; Moore JS
    Occup Med; 1992; 7(4):593-608. PubMed ID: 1411850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. MAPO index for risk assessment of patient manual handling in hospital wards: a validation study.
    Battevi N; Menoni O; Ricci MG; Cairoli S
    Ergonomics; 2006 Jun; 49(7):671-87. PubMed ID: 16720528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Occupational driving as a risk factor in low back pain: a case-control study in a Mexican population.
    Prado-León LR; Aceves-González C; Avila-Chaurand R
    Work; 2008; 31(4):387-96. PubMed ID: 19127009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Low back problems and possible improvements in nursing jobs.
    Vieira ER; Kumar S; Coury HJ; Narayan Y
    J Adv Nurs; 2006 Jul; 55(1):79-89. PubMed ID: 16768742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Study on lifting-related musculoskeletal disorders among workers in metal processing].
    Xiao GB; Lei L; Dempsey P; Ma ZH; Liang YX
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2004 Apr; 22(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 15130432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical risk factors for occupationally related low back disorders.
    Marras WS; Lavender SA; Leurgans SE; Fathallah FA; Ferguson SA; Allread WG; Rajulu SL
    Ergonomics; 1995 Feb; 38(2):377-410. PubMed ID: 7895740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The revised NIOSH lifting guidelines. Application in a hospital setting.
    Steinbrecher SM
    AAOHN J; 1994 Feb; 42(2):62-6. PubMed ID: 8147989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Workplace risk factors and occupational musculoskeletal disorders, Part 1: A review of biomechanical and psychophysical research on risk factors associated with low-back pain.
    Keyserling WM
    AIHAJ; 2000; 61(1):39-50. PubMed ID: 10772613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Muscle strength, task performance and low back load in nurses.
    de Looze MP; Zinzen E; Caboor D; van Roy P; Clarijs JP
    Ergonomics; 1998 Aug; 41(8):1095-104. PubMed ID: 9715669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Occupational back belt use: a literature review.
    Hodgson EA
    AAOHN J; 1996 Sep; 44(9):438-43. PubMed ID: 8924067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.