BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9866595)

  • 1. Construct validity of Minimum Data Set items within the context of the Braden Conceptual Schema.
    Zulkowski K
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1998 Oct; 44(10):36-40, 42-4, 46-7. PubMed ID: 9866595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. MDS+ RAP items associated with pressure ulcer prevalence in newly institutionalized elderly: study I.
    Zulkowski K
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1998 Nov; 44(11):40-4, 46-8, 50, passim. PubMed ID: 9919294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. MDS+ items not contained in the pressure ulcer RAP associated with pressure ulcer prevalence in newly institutionalized elderly.
    Zulkowski K
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1999 Jan; 45(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 10085969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A conceptual model of pressure ulcer prevalence: MDS+ items and nutrition.
    Zulkowski K
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1999 Feb; 45(2):36-8, 40, 42-4. PubMed ID: 10223013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Skin assessment and pressure ulcer care in hospital-based skilled nursing facilities.
    Siem CA; Wipke-Tevis DD; Rantz MJ; Popejoy LL
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2003 Jun; 49(6):42-4, 46, 48 passim, contd. PubMed ID: 12874483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An interrater reliability study of the assessment of pressure ulcer risk using the Braden scale and the classification of pressure ulcers in a home care setting.
    Kottner J; Halfens R; Dassen T
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Oct; 46(10):1307-12. PubMed ID: 19406400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pressure ulcers: the Minimum Data Set and the Resident Assessment Protocol.
    Brandeis GH; Berlowitz DR; Hossain M; Morris JN
    Adv Wound Care; 1995; 8(6):18-25. PubMed ID: 8696573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prevalence, incidence, management, and predictors of venous ulcers in the long-term-care population using the MDS.
    Wipke-Tevis DD; Rantz MJ; Mehr DR; Popejoy L; Petroski G; Madsen R; Conn VS; Grando VT; Porter R; Maas M
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2000; 13(5):218-24. PubMed ID: 11075021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predicting pressure ulcer risk with the modified Braden, Braden, and Norton scales in acute care hospitals in Mainland China.
    Kwong E; Pang S; Wong T; Ho J; Shao-ling X; Li-jun T
    Appl Nurs Res; 2005 May; 18(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 15991112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A temporary solution to reverse staging: the skin care evaluation sheet.
    Wright KD
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1997 Aug; 43(7):28-32. PubMed ID: 9282044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An interrater reliability study of the Braden scale in two nursing homes.
    Kottner J; Dassen T
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2008 Oct; 45(10):1501-11. PubMed ID: 18395726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Developing a pressure ulcer risk assessment scale for patients in long-term care.
    Lepisto M; Eriksson E; Hietanen H; Lepisto J; Lauri S
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2006 Feb; 52(2):34-46. PubMed ID: 16464993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating a national assessment strategy for urinary incontinence in nursing home residents: reliability of the minimum data set and validity of the resident assessment protocol.
    Resnick NM; Brandeis GH; Baumann MM; Morris JN
    Neurourol Urodyn; 1996; 15(6):583-98. PubMed ID: 8916112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predicting the risk of pressure ulcers in critically ill patients.
    Carlson EV; Kemp MG; Shott S
    Am J Crit Care; 1999 Jul; 8(4):262-9. PubMed ID: 10392227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors affecting the predictive validity of the Braden Scale.
    Capobianco ML; McDonald DD
    Adv Wound Care; 1996; 9(6):32-6. PubMed ID: 9069754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Evaluating the risks of pressure ulcers. The Braden scale].
    Torra i Bou JE
    Rev Enferm; 1997 Apr; 20(224):22-30. PubMed ID: 9220862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing predictive validity of the modified Braden scale for prediction of pressure ulcer risk of orthopaedic patients in an acute care setting.
    Chan WS; Pang SM; Kwong EW
    J Clin Nurs; 2009 Jun; 18(11):1565-73. PubMed ID: 19490294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Friction and shear highly associated with pressure ulcers of residents in long-term care - Classification Tree Analysis (CHAID) of Braden items.
    Lahmann NA; Tannen A; Dassen T; Kottner J
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2011 Feb; 17(1):168-73. PubMed ID: 20831665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Be a continence champion: use the CHAMMP tool to individualize the plan of care.
    Bucci AT
    Geriatr Nurs; 2007; 28(2):120-4; quiz 125. PubMed ID: 17430746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pressure ulcer patient and wound assessment: an AHCPR clinical practice guideline update.
    van Rijswijk L; Braden BJ
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1999 Jan; 45(1A Suppl):56S-67S; quiz 68S-69S. PubMed ID: 10085976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.