These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

50 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9866658)

  • 1. Noninvasive testing for coronary artery disease: which is best?
    Graber MA
    J Fam Pract; 1998 Dec; 47(6):414-5. PubMed ID: 9866658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical practice. Noninvasive tests in patients with stable coronary artery disease.
    Lee TH; Boucher CA
    N Engl J Med; 2001 Jun; 344(24):1840-5. PubMed ID: 11407346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pharmacologic stress testing for coronary disease diagnosis: A meta-analysis.
    Kim C; Kwok YS; Heagerty P; Redberg R
    Am Heart J; 2001 Dec; 142(6):934-44. PubMed ID: 11717594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of noninvasive testing in the diagnosis and prognosis of women with suspected CAD.
    Shaw LJ; Mieres JH
    J Fam Pract; 2005 Jul; Suppl():4-5, 7. PubMed ID: 16134556
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Myocardial perfusion assessment in patients with medium probability of coronary artery disease and no prior myocardial infarction: comparison of myocardial contrast echocardiography with 99mTc single-photon emission computed tomography.
    Senior R; Lepper W; Pasquet A; Chung G; Hoffman R; Vanoverschelde JL; Cerqueira M; Kaul S
    Am Heart J; 2004 Jun; 147(6):1100-5. PubMed ID: 15199362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accelerated stress real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography for the detection of coronary artery disease: comparison with 99mTc single photon emission computed tomography.
    Lipiec P; Wejner-Mik P; Krzemińska-Pakuła M; Kuśmierek J; Płachcińska A; Szumiński R; Peruga JZ; Kasprzak JD
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2008 Aug; 21(8):941-7. PubMed ID: 18385014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Usefulness of abnormal heart rate recovery on exercise stress testing to predict high-risk findings on single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging in men.
    Gera N; Taillon LA; Ward RP
    Am J Cardiol; 2009 Mar; 103(5):611-4. PubMed ID: 19231321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide predicts extent of coronary artery disease and ischemia in patients with stable angina pectoris.
    Weber M; Dill T; Arnold R; Rau M; Ekinci O; Müller KD; Berkovitsch A; Mitrovic V; Hamm C
    Am Heart J; 2004 Oct; 148(4):612-20. PubMed ID: 15459591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Superiority of exercise myocardial perfusion imaging compared with the exercise ECG in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.
    Bokhari S; Shahzad A; Bergmann SR
    Coron Artery Dis; 2008 Sep; 19(6):399-404. PubMed ID: 18955833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of coronary calcification by electron-beam computed tomography in symptomatic patients with normal, abnormal or equivocal exercise stress test.
    Schmermund A; Baumgart D; Sack S; Möhlenkamp S; Grönemeyer D; Seibel R; Erbel R
    Eur Heart J; 2000 Oct; 21(20):1674-82. PubMed ID: 11032694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Determinants of heart rate recovery in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.
    Nonaka A; Shiotani H; Kitano K; Yokoyama M
    Kobe J Med Sci; 2007; 53(3):93-8. PubMed ID: 17684440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cardiopulmonary exercise test evidence of isolated right coronary artery disease.
    Contini M; Andreini D; Agostoni P
    Int J Cardiol; 2006 Nov; 113(2):281-2. PubMed ID: 16316693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Selecting the best stress test for each patient.
    Crawford MH
    Contemp Intern Med; 1993 Aug; 5(8):46-50, 55-8. PubMed ID: 10146298
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recent advances in cardiac stress testing.
    Rasalingam R; Saeed IM
    J Insur Med; 2013; 43(4):227-32. PubMed ID: 24069783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Who needs cardiac evaluation?
    Johns Hopkins Med Lett Health After 50; 2001 Apr; 13(2):1-2. PubMed ID: 14723202
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost-effectiveness of coronary artery disease screening in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes and other atherogenic risk factors in Japan: factors influencing on international application of evidence-based guidelines.
    Hayashino Y; Shimbo T; Tsujii S; Ishii H; Kondo H; Nakamura T; Nagata-Kobayashi S; Fukui T
    Int J Cardiol; 2007 May; 118(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 16949690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Noninvasive tests of myocardial perfusion: stress tests and their values.
    Liao T; Park KW
    Int Anesthesiol Clin; 2001; 39(4):1-10. PubMed ID: 11581533
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Exercise echocardiography vs exercise SPECT testing.
    Kymes S; Shaw L; Fletcher J
    JAMA; 1999 Nov; 282(17):1622; author reply 1622-3. PubMed ID: 10553784
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exercise echocardiography vs exercise SPECT testing.
    O'Keefe JH; Bateman TM; Gibbons RJ
    JAMA; 1999 Nov; 282(17):1621-2; author reply 1622-3. PubMed ID: 10553783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exercise echocardiography vs exercise SPECT testing.
    Dickinson CZ; Dworkin HJ
    JAMA; 1999 Nov; 282(17):1621; author reply 1622-3. PubMed ID: 10553782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.