235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9867656)
1. Panel tightens rules on mental disorders.
Marshall E
Science; 1998 Nov; 282(5394):1617. PubMed ID: 9867656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Ethical and human-rights issues in research on mental disorders that may affect decision-making capacity.
Capron AM
N Engl J Med; 1999 May; 340(18):1430-4. PubMed ID: 10228198
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Are research ethics bad for our mental health?
Michels R
N Engl J Med; 1999 May; 340(18):1427-30. PubMed ID: 10228197
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Panel pulls back report after NIH critique.
Marshall E
Science; 1998 Oct; 282(5390):857,859. PubMed ID: 9841427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. An introduction to NBAC's report on research involving persons with mental disorders that may affect decisionmaking capacity.
Childress JF
Account Res; 1999; 7(2-4):101-15. PubMed ID: 11658169
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Bioethics group divided over research on mentally ill.
Weiss R
Washington Post; 1998 Nov; ():A6. PubMed ID: 11648074
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. In harm's way: research subjects who are decisionally impaired.
Sundram CJ
J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):36-65. PubMed ID: 15573429
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Research ethics panel urges new regulations to protect mentally ill.
Weiss R
Washington Post; 1998 Nov; ():A11. PubMed ID: 11648075
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Accountability in research using persons with mental illness.
Shamoo AE; Irving DN
Account Res; 1993; 3(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 11659726
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Regulation of research on the decisionally impaired: history and gaps in the current regulatory system.
Moreno JD
J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 15573427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Competence and consent to research: a critique of the recommendations of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission.
Appelbaum PS
Account Res; 1999; 7(2-4):265-76. PubMed ID: 11658181
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Psychiatric researchers under fire.
Hilts PJ
N Y Times Web; 1998 May; ():F1, F5. PubMed ID: 11648088
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. National commission proposes numerous new regulations of institutional review boards.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1998 Oct; 13(10):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657739
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Legal and ethical complexities of consent with cognitively impaired research subjects: proposed guidelines.
Berg JW
J Law Med Ethics; 1996; 24(1):18-35. PubMed ID: 8925010
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Psychiatric guinea pigs are left in limbo.
Boyce N
New Sci; 1998 Nov; 160(2162):21. PubMed ID: 11660595
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The ethics of conducting psychosis-inducing experiments.
Sharav VH
Account Res; 1999; 7(2-4):137-67. PubMed ID: 11658172
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Research ethics. NIH examines standards for consent.
Marshall E
Science; 1998 Jun; 280(5370):1688. PubMed ID: 9660706
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Engaging the public in policy development: the National Bioethics Advisory Commission report on "Research Involving Persons with Mental Disorders that May Affect Decisionmaking Capacity.
Meslin EM
Account Res; 1999; 7(2-4):227-39. PubMed ID: 11658178
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Maryland's effort to regulate ethically sensitive research: a step in the right direction.
Schwartz J
Account Res; 1999; 7(2-4):169-74. PubMed ID: 11658173
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Regulation of psychiatric research: a socioethical analysis.
Tancredi LR; Maxfield CT
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1983; 6(1):17-38. PubMed ID: 6642824
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
