152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9867891)
1. A hierarchical outcomes approach to test assessment.
Pearl WS
Ann Emerg Med; 1999 Jan; 33(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 9867891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The evaluation of diagnostic tests: evidence on technical and diagnostic accuracy, impact on patient outcome and cost-effectiveness is needed.
Van den Bruel A; Cleemput I; Aertgeerts B; Ramaekers D; Buntinx F
J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Nov; 60(11):1116-22. PubMed ID: 17938052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating bias and variability in diagnostic test reports.
Mower WR
Ann Emerg Med; 1999 Jan; 33(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 9867892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Linking the evidence: intermediate outcomes in medical test assessments.
Staub LP; Dyer S; Lord SJ; Simes RJ
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2012 Jan; 28(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 22230006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Technology assessment--an American view.
Thornbury JR; Fryback DG
Eur J Radiol; 1992; 14(2):147-56. PubMed ID: 1563415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research. Getting better but still not good.
Reid MC; Lachs MS; Feinstein AR
JAMA; 1995 Aug 23-30; 274(8):645-51. PubMed ID: 7637146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Low-cost diagnostic technologies and clinical outcomes. The impact of inappropriate utilization.
Lewis S; Foreman J
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1997; 13(4):501-11. PubMed ID: 9489242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using evidence to determine diagnostic test efficacy.
Replogle WH; Johnson WD; Hoover KW
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs; 2009; 6(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 19413584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Technology assessment in medicine.
Littenberg B
Acad Med; 1992 Jul; 67(7):424-8. PubMed ID: 1616553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Adherence to Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy in Emergency Medicine Research.
Gallo L; Hua N; Mercuri M; Silveira A; Worster A;
Acad Emerg Med; 2017 Aug; 24(8):914-919. PubMed ID: 28621810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy.
Leeflang MM
Clin Microbiol Infect; 2014 Feb; 20(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 24274632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A protocol for a systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of Loop-mediated-isothermal AMPlification (LAMP) in diagnosis of invasive meningococcal disease in children.
Waterfield T; Fairley D; Lynn F; Blackwood B; Shields MD
Syst Rev; 2018 Jun; 7(1):86. PubMed ID: 29903029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A guide to aid the selection of diagnostic tests.
Kosack CS; Page AL; Klatser PR
Bull World Health Organ; 2017 Sep; 95(9):639-645. PubMed ID: 28867844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Eugene W. Caldwell Lecture. Clinical efficacy of diagnostic imaging: love it or leave it.
Thornbury JR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jan; 162(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 8273645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 5. Diagnostic accuracy studies.
Manchikanti L; Derby R; Wolfer L; Singh V; Datta S; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(3):517-40. PubMed ID: 19461821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Technology assessment: scientific challenges.
Royal HD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Sep; 163(3):503-7. PubMed ID: 8079834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Variation of a test's sensitivity and specificity with disease prevalence.
Leeflang MM; Rutjes AW; Reitsma JB; Hooft L; Bossuyt PM
CMAJ; 2013 Aug; 185(11):E537-44. PubMed ID: 23798453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Technology assessment for radiologists.
Sunshine JH; Applegate KE
Radiology; 2004 Feb; 230(2):309-14. PubMed ID: 14752174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Guidelines for diagnostic tests and diagnostic accuracy in surgical research.
Jones CM; Ashrafian H; Darzi A; Athanasiou T
J Invest Surg; 2010 Feb; 23(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 20233006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A model for technology assessment as applied to closed loop infusion systems. Technology Assessment Task Force of the Society of Critical Care Medicine.
Jastremski M; Jastremski C; Shepherd M; Friedman V; Porembka D; Smith R; Gonzales E; Swedlow D; Belzberg H; Crass R
Crit Care Med; 1995 Oct; 23(10):1745-55. PubMed ID: 7587242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
