These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9868939)

  • 1. A comparison of digitally scanned radiographs with conventional film for the detection of small endodontic instruments.
    Fuge KN; Stuck AM; Love RM
    Int Endod J; 1998 Mar; 31(2):123-6. PubMed ID: 9868939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of phosphor-plate digital images with conventional radiographs for the perceived clarity of fine endodontic files and periapical lesions.
    Friedlander LT; Love RM; Chandler NP
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 Mar; 93(3):321-7. PubMed ID: 11925542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Endodontic measurement accuracy and perceived radiograph quality: effects of film speed and density.
    Sheaffer JC; Eleazer PD; Scheetz JP; Clark SJ; Farman AG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Oct; 96(4):441-8. PubMed ID: 14561969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiovisiography versus conventional radiography for detection of small instruments in endodontic length determination. II. In vivo evaluation.
    Ellingsen MA; Hollender LG; Harrington GW
    J Endod; 1995 Oct; 21(10):516-20. PubMed ID: 8596074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Linear measurements to determine working length of curved canals with fine files: conventional versus digital radiography.
    Brito-Júnior M; Santos LA; Baleeiro EN; Pêgo MM; Eleutério NB; Camilo CC
    J Oral Sci; 2009 Dec; 51(4):559-64. PubMed ID: 20032608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of observer performance in determining the position of endodontic files with physical measures in the evaluation of dental X-ray imaging systems.
    Vandre RH; Pajak JC; Abdel-Nabi H; Farman TT; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jul; 29(4):216-22. PubMed ID: 10918454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of apical root transportation associated with ProTaper Universal F3 and F4 instruments by using digital subtraction radiography.
    Kunert GG; Camargo Fontanella VR; de Moura AA; Barletta FB
    J Endod; 2010 Jun; 36(6):1052-5. PubMed ID: 20478464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Endodontic working length assessment. Comparison of storage phosphor digital imaging and radiographic film.
    Cederberg RA; Tidwell E; Frederiksen NL; Benson BW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Mar; 85(3):325-8. PubMed ID: 9540092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clarity and diagnostic quality of digitized conventional intraoral radiographs.
    Goga R; Chandler NP; Love RM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 15314002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of digital and geometric unsharpness in dental radiographs using an endodontic file model.
    Radan E; Price C
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 Feb; 93(2):208-14. PubMed ID: 11862213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measurement of the distance between the minor foramen and the anatomic apex by digital and conventional radiography.
    Melius B; Jiang J; Zhu Q
    J Endod; 2002 Feb; 28(2):125-6. PubMed ID: 11833685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiovisiography versus conventional radiography for detection of small instruments in endodontic length determination. Part 1. In vitro evaluation.
    Ellingsen MA; Harrington GW; Hollender LG
    J Endod; 1995 Jun; 21(6):326-31. PubMed ID: 7673842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of ambient light and bit depth of digital radiograph on observer performance in determination of endodontic file positioning.
    Heo MS; Han DH; An BM; Huh KH; Yi WJ; Lee SS; Choi SC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Feb; 105(2):239-44. PubMed ID: 17604662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of film-based, digital, and enhanced digital images for endodontic length determination.
    Woolhiser GA; Brand JW; Hoen MM; Geist JR; Pikula AA; Pink FE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Apr; 99(4):499-504. PubMed ID: 15772601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ex vivo comparison of radiographic and electronic root canal length measurements in primary molars.
    Topaloglu-Ak A; Aykut Yetkiner A; Güniz Baksi B; Eronat C
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2015 Jun; 16(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 26147823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of radiographic measurements obtained with conventional and indirect digital imaging during endodontic treatment.
    Schmitd LB; Lima Tde C; Chinellato LE; Bramante CM; Garcia RB; de Moraes IG; Bernardineli N
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2008; 16(2):167-70. PubMed ID: 19089211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of X-ray beam angulation and intraradicular contrast medium on radiographic interpretation of lower first molar root canal anatomy.
    Naoum HJ; Love RM; Chandler NP; Herbison P
    Int Endod J; 2003 Jan; 36(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 12656509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An ex vivo comparison of conventional and digital radiography for perceived image quality of root fillings.
    Akdeniz BG; Soğur E
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):397-401. PubMed ID: 15910475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conventional versus storage phosphor-plate digital images to visualize the root canal system contrasted with a radiopaque medium.
    Naoum HJ; Chandler NP; Love RM
    J Endod; 2003 May; 29(5):349-52. PubMed ID: 12775009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Efficacy of several digital radiographic imaging systems for laboratory determination of endodontic file length.
    Oliveira ML; Ambrosano GM; Almeida SM; Haiter-Neto F; Tosoni GM
    Int Endod J; 2011 May; 44(5):469-73. PubMed ID: 21276021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.