These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9868939)

  • 21. Radiographic identification of separated instruments retained in the apical third of root canal-filled teeth.
    Rosen E; Azizi H; Friedlander C; Taschieri S; Tsesis I
    J Endod; 2014 Oct; 40(10):1549-52. PubMed ID: 25159723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Apical transportation: two assessment methods.
    López FU; Travessas JA; Fachin E; Fontanella V; Grecca F
    Aust Endod J; 2009 Aug; 35(2):85-8. PubMed ID: 19703081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An in vivo radiographic evaluation of the accuracy of Apex and iPex electronic Apex locators.
    Paludo L; Souza SL; Só MV; Rosa RA; Vier-Pelisser FV; Duarte MA
    Braz Dent J; 2012; 23(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 22460316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Root canal shaping using rotary nickel-titanium files in preclinical dental education in Turkey.
    Ünal GÇ; Maden M; Orhan EO; Sarıtekin E; Teke A
    J Dent Educ; 2012 Apr; 76(4):509-13. PubMed ID: 22473564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of combined digital imaging parameters on endodontic file measurements.
    de Oliveira ML; Pinto GC; Ambrosano GM; Tosoni GM
    J Endod; 2012 Oct; 38(10):1404-7. PubMed ID: 22980188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The use of high-resolution digital imaging technology for small diameter K-file length determination in endodontics.
    Vandenberghe B; Bud M; Sutanto A; Jacobs R
    Clin Oral Investig; 2010 Apr; 14(2):223-31. PubMed ID: 19452176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Gray scale inversion in digital image for measurement of tooth length.
    Oliveira ML; Vieira ML; Cruz AD; Bóscolo FN; DE Almeida SM
    Braz Dent J; 2012; 23(6):703-6. PubMed ID: 23338264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparison of apical transportation between ProFile and RaCe rotary instruments.
    García M; Duran-Sindreu F; Mercadé M; Bueno R; Roig M
    J Endod; 2012 Jul; 38(7):990-2. PubMed ID: 22703667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison among manual instruments and PathFile and Mtwo rotary instruments to create a glide path in the root canal preparation of curved canals.
    Alves Vde O; Bueno CE; Cunha RS; Pinheiro SL; Fontana CE; de Martin AS
    J Endod; 2012 Jan; 38(1):117-20. PubMed ID: 22152634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of endodontic files in digital radiographs before and after employing three image processing algorithms.
    Li G; Sanderink GC; Welander U; McDavid WD; Näsström K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 15140815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Study of the areas and thicknesses of mesiobucal root canals prepared by three endodontic techniques.
    Constante IG; Davidowicz H; Barletta FB; de Moura AA
    Braz Oral Res; 2007; 21(2):118-26. PubMed ID: 17589646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparison of apical transportation between FlexMaster and Twisted Files rotary instruments.
    Duran-Sindreu F; García M; Olivieri JG; Mercadé M; Morelló S; Roig M
    J Endod; 2012 Jul; 38(7):993-5. PubMed ID: 22703668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An in vivo comparison of working length determination by only root-ZX apex locator versus combining root-ZX apex locator with radiographs using a new impression technique.
    Kim E; Marmo M; Lee CY; Oh NS; Kim IK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Apr; 105(4):e79-83. PubMed ID: 18329572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of radiographic and electronical working length determination on palatal and mesio-buccal root canals of extracted upper molars.
    Krajczár K; Marada G; Gyulai G; Tóth V
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Aug; 106(2):e90-3. PubMed ID: 18554958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A new approach for locating the minor apical foramen using an artificial neural network.
    Saghiri MA; Asgar K; Boukani KK; Lotfi M; Aghili H; Delvarani A; Karamifar K; Saghiri AM; Mehrvarzfar P; Garcia-Godoy F
    Int Endod J; 2012 Mar; 45(3):257-65. PubMed ID: 22007705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparison between conventional and digital radiography in root canal working length determination.
    Farida A; Maryam E; Ali M; Ehsan M; Sajad Y; Soraya K
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(2):229-33. PubMed ID: 23965452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Digitally Scanned Radiographs versus Conventional Films for Determining Clarity of Periapical Lesions and Quality of Root Canal Treatment.
    Almanei K; Alsulaimani R; Alfadda S; Albabtain S; Alsulaimani R
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2017; 2017():2427060. PubMed ID: 29270461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A micro-computed tomographic evaluation of apical root canal preparation using three instrumentation techniques.
    Moore J; Fitz-Walter P; Parashos P
    Int Endod J; 2009 Dec; 42(12):1057-64. PubMed ID: 19912375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of various digital processing algorithms on the measurement accuracy of endodontic file length.
    Kal BI; Baksi BG; Dündar N; Sen BH
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Feb; 103(2):280-4. PubMed ID: 17234548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. In vitro comparison of root-canal measurements with conventional and digital radiology.
    Lozano A; Forner L; Llena C
    Int Endod J; 2002 Jun; 35(6):542-50. PubMed ID: 12190912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.