These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9869995)

  • 1. Randomized comparison of a 90 uF capacitor three-electrode defibrillation system with a 125 uF two-electrode defibrillation system.
    Bahu M; Knight BP; Weiss R; Hahn SJ; Goyal R; Daoud EG; Man KC; Morady F; Strickberger SA
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 1998 Mar; 2(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 9869995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prospective, randomized comparison in humans of a unipolar defibrillation system with that using an additional superior vena cava electrode.
    Bardy GH; Dolack GL; Kudenchuk PJ; Poole JE; Mehra R; Johnson G
    Circulation; 1994 Mar; 89(3):1090-3. PubMed ID: 8124794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A prospective randomized comparison in humans of biphasic waveform 60-microF and 120-microF capacitance pulses using a unipolar defibrillation system.
    Bardy GH; Poole JE; Kudenchuk PJ; Dolack GL; Mehra R; DeGroot P; Raitt MH; Jones GK; Johnson G
    Circulation; 1995 Jan; 91(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 7805224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biphasic defibrillation using a single capacitor with large capacitance: reduction of peak voltages and ICD device size.
    Block M; Hammel D; Böcker D; Borggrefe M; Budde T; Isbruch F; Scheld HH; Breithardt G
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Feb; 19(2):207-14. PubMed ID: 8834690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biphasic waveform defibrillation using a three-electrode transvenous lead system in humans.
    Marks ML; Johnson G; Hofer BO; Bardy GH
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1994 Feb; 5(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 8186880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prospective randomized comparison of biphasic waveform tilt using a unipolar defibrillation system.
    Poole JE; Bardy GH; Kudenchuk PJ; Dolack GL; Raitt MH; Mehra R; Johnson G
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Jul; 18(7):1369-73. PubMed ID: 7567589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lead system optimization for transvenous defibrillation.
    Gold MR; Foster AH; Shorofsky SR
    Am J Cardiol; 1997 Nov; 80(9):1163-7. PubMed ID: 9359543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of an active pectoral-pulse generator shell on defibrillation efficacy with a transvenous lead system.
    Gold MR; Foster AH; Shorofsky SR
    Am J Cardiol; 1996 Sep; 78(5):540-3. PubMed ID: 8806339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A prospective randomized comparison of defibrillation efficacy of truncated pulses and damped sine wave pulses in humans.
    Bardy GH; Zaghi H; Gartman D; Poole JE; Kudenchuk PK; Dolack GL; Johnson G; Troutman C
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1994 Sep; 5(9):725-30. PubMed ID: 7827711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Defibrillation efficacy comparing a subcutaneous array electrode versus an "active can" implantable cardioverter defibrillator and a subcutaneous array electrode in addition to an "active can" implantable cardioverter defibrillator: results from active can versus array trials I and II.
    Gradaus R; Block M; Seidl K; Brunn J; Isgro F; Hammel D; Hauer B; Breithardt G; Bocker D
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2001 Aug; 12(8):921-7. PubMed ID: 11513444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A prospective, randomized, comparison in patients between a pectoral unipolar defibrillation system and that using an additional inferior vena cava electrode.
    Favale S; Dicandia CD; Tunzi P; Rizzon P
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Aug; 22(8):1140-5. PubMed ID: 10461288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of single- and dual-coil active pectoral defibrillation lead systems.
    Gold MR; Olsovsky MR; Pelini MA; Peters RW; Shorofsky SR
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1998 May; 31(6):1391-4. PubMed ID: 9581739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dual-coil vs single-coil active pectoral implantable defibrillator lead systems: defibrillation energy requirements and probability of defibrillation success at multiples of the defibrillation energy requirements.
    Schulte B; Sperzel J; Carlsson J; Schwarz T; Ehrlich W; Pitschner HF; Neuzner J
    Europace; 2001 Jul; 3(3):177-80. PubMed ID: 11467457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of an active abdominal pulse generator on defibrillation thresholds with a dual-coil, transvenous ICD lead system.
    Rashba EJ; Farasat M; Kirk MM; Shorofsky SR; Peters RW; Gold MR
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2006 Jun; 17(6):617-20. PubMed ID: 16836709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A prospective randomized evaluation of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator size on unipolar defibrillation system efficacy.
    Jones GK; Poole JE; Kudenchuk PJ; Dolack GL; Johnson G; DeGroot P; Gleva MJ; Raitt M; Bardy GH
    Circulation; 1995 Nov; 92(10):2940-3. PubMed ID: 7586263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Submuscular versus subcutaneous pectoral implantation of cardioverter-defibrillators: effect on high voltage pathway impedance and defibrillation efficacy.
    Iskos D; Lock K; Lurie KG; Fahy GJ; Petersen-Stejskal S; Benditt DG
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 1998 Mar; 2(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 9869996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Combination biphasic waveform plus sequential pulse defibrillation improves defibrillation efficacy of a nonthoracotomy lead system.
    Exner D; Yee R; Jones DL; Klein GJ; Mehra R
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1994 Feb; 23(2):317-22. PubMed ID: 8294680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Transvenous subcutaneous implantation technique of the cardioverter/defibrillator].
    Block M; Hammel D; Borggrefe M; Scheld HH; Breithardt G
    Herz; 1994 Oct; 19(5):259-77. PubMed ID: 8001899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of defibrillator-can size on defibrillation success with a single-lead unipolar system.
    Newby KH; Moredock L; Rembert J; Wharton JM; Natale A
    Am Heart J; 1996 Feb; 131(2):261-5. PubMed ID: 8579018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of defibrillation efficacy using biphasic waveforms delivered from various capacitances/pulse widths.
    Lin JH; Stotts LJ; Rosborough JP; Frederick H
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Jan; 20(1 Pt 2):158-62. PubMed ID: 9121981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.