These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9869996)

  • 1. Submuscular versus subcutaneous pectoral implantation of cardioverter-defibrillators: effect on high voltage pathway impedance and defibrillation efficacy.
    Iskos D; Lock K; Lurie KG; Fahy GJ; Petersen-Stejskal S; Benditt DG
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 1998 Mar; 2(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 9869996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A prospective, randomized, comparison in patients between a pectoral unipolar defibrillation system and that using an additional inferior vena cava electrode.
    Favale S; Dicandia CD; Tunzi P; Rizzon P
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Aug; 22(8):1140-5. PubMed ID: 10461288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A prospective randomized comparison in humans of biphasic waveform 60-microF and 120-microF capacitance pulses using a unipolar defibrillation system.
    Bardy GH; Poole JE; Kudenchuk PJ; Dolack GL; Mehra R; DeGroot P; Raitt MH; Jones GK; Johnson G
    Circulation; 1995 Jan; 91(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 7805224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of an active abdominal pulse generator on defibrillation thresholds with a dual-coil, transvenous ICD lead system.
    Rashba EJ; Farasat M; Kirk MM; Shorofsky SR; Peters RW; Gold MR
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2006 Jun; 17(6):617-20. PubMed ID: 16836709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lack of benefit of an active pectoral pulse generator on atrial defibrillation thresholds.
    Gold MR; Shorofsky SR; Bouhouch R; Joy RA; Kirby DS; Osman AF; Rashba EJ
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2002 Apr; 13(4):332-5. PubMed ID: 12033348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Defibrillation efficacy comparing a subcutaneous array electrode versus an "active can" implantable cardioverter defibrillator and a subcutaneous array electrode in addition to an "active can" implantable cardioverter defibrillator: results from active can versus array trials I and II.
    Gradaus R; Block M; Seidl K; Brunn J; Isgro F; Hammel D; Hauer B; Breithardt G; Bocker D
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2001 Aug; 12(8):921-7. PubMed ID: 11513444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dual-coil vs single-coil active pectoral implantable defibrillator lead systems: defibrillation energy requirements and probability of defibrillation success at multiples of the defibrillation energy requirements.
    Schulte B; Sperzel J; Carlsson J; Schwarz T; Ehrlich W; Pitschner HF; Neuzner J
    Europace; 2001 Jul; 3(3):177-80. PubMed ID: 11467457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pectoral cardioverter defibrillators: comparison of prepectoral and submuscular implantation techniques.
    Manolis AS; Chiladakis J; Vassilikos V; Maounis T; Cokkinos DV
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Mar; 22(3):469-78. PubMed ID: 10192856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical predictors of atrial defibrillation thresholds with a dual-coil, active pectoral lead system.
    Rashba EJ; Shorofsky SR; Brown T; Peters RW; Gold MR
    Heart Rhythm; 2005 Jan; 2(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 15851265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimization of atrial defibrillation with a dual-coil, active pectoral lead system.
    Rashba EJ; Shorofsky SR; Peters RW; Gold MR
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2004 Jul; 15(7):790-4. PubMed ID: 15250864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Coronary sinus electrode does not reduce atrial defibrillation thresholds.
    Rashba EJ; Shorofsky SR; Scheiner A; Peters RW; Ma C; Gold MR
    Heart Rhythm; 2006 Jun; 3(6):647-52. PubMed ID: 16731464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimal electrode configuration for pectoral transvenous implantable defibrillator without an active can.
    Swerdlow CD; Davie S; Kass RM; Chen PS; Hwang C; Mandel WJ; Gang ES; Raissi S; Peter CT
    Am J Cardiol; 1995 Aug; 76(5):370-4. PubMed ID: 7639162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Defibrillation failure in patients undergoing replacement of subcutaneous defibrillator pulse generator.
    Rudic B; Tülümen E; Fastenrath F; Akin I; Borggrefe M; Kuschyk J
    Heart Rhythm; 2020 Mar; 17(3):455-459. PubMed ID: 31669771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of the addition of an abdominal hot can cardioverter/defibrillator pulse generator on the defibrillation energy requirements in a single-lead endocardial defibrillation system.
    Neuzner J; Schwarz T; Strasser R; Schlepper M; Pitschner H
    Eur Heart J; 1997 Oct; 18(10):1655-8. PubMed ID: 9347278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Complications associated with pectoral cardioverter-defibrillator implantation: comparison of subcutaneous and submuscular approaches. Worldwide Jewel Investigators.
    Gold MR; Peters RW; Johnson JW; Shorofsky SR
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1996 Nov; 28(5):1278-82. PubMed ID: 8890827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prospective, randomized comparison in humans of a unipolar defibrillation system with that using an additional superior vena cava electrode.
    Bardy GH; Dolack GL; Kudenchuk PJ; Poole JE; Mehra R; Johnson G
    Circulation; 1994 Mar; 89(3):1090-3. PubMed ID: 8124794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Estimation of defibrillation threshold using abdominally implanted cardioverter-defibrillator with an additional defibrillation pole in a dual-coil lead endocardial defibrillation system].
    Pazdyga A; Lubiński A; Lewicka-Nowak E; Królak T; Kempa M; Zienciuk A; Raczak G
    Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2007 Feb; 22(128):86-9. PubMed ID: 17598649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Right pectoral implantable cardioverter defibrillators: role of the proximal (SVC) coil.
    Varma N; Efimov I
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2008 Aug; 31(8):1025-35. PubMed ID: 18684259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biphasic defibrillation using a single capacitor with large capacitance: reduction of peak voltages and ICD device size.
    Block M; Hammel D; Böcker D; Borggrefe M; Budde T; Isbruch F; Scheld HH; Breithardt G
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Feb; 19(2):207-14. PubMed ID: 8834690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Determinants of Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Efficacy: A Computer Modeling Study.
    Heist EK; Belalcazar A; Stahl W; Brouwer TF; Knops RE
    JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2017 Apr; 3(4):405-414. PubMed ID: 29759454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.