These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9870022)

  • 1. The effect of delivered energy on defibrillation shock impedance.
    Weiss DN; Shorofsky SR; Peters RW; Gold MR
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 1998 Sep; 2(3):273-7. PubMed ID: 9870022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of shock configuration and delivered energy on defibrillation impedance.
    Olsovsky MR; Shorofsky SR; Gold MR
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Jan; 22(1 Pt 2):165-8. PubMed ID: 9990623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of epicardial patches on defibrillation threshold with nonthoracotomy lead configurations.
    Fotuhi PC; Ideker RE; Idriss SF; Callihan RL; Walker RG; Alt EU
    Circulation; 1995 Nov; 92(10):3082-8. PubMed ID: 7586279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lack of benefit of an active pectoral pulse generator on atrial defibrillation thresholds.
    Gold MR; Shorofsky SR; Bouhouch R; Joy RA; Kirby DS; Osman AF; Rashba EJ
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2002 Apr; 13(4):332-5. PubMed ID: 12033348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Utility of low energy test shocks for estimation of cardiac and electrode impedance with implantable defibrillators.
    Leitch JW; Yee R; Klein GJ; Jones DL
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Apr; 13(4):410-6. PubMed ID: 1692124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Temporary transvenous cardioversion and defibrillation: a new method for practical tachyarrhythmia management.
    Luceri RM; Accorti PR
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Jan; 20(1 Pt 2):168-72. PubMed ID: 9121983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multicentre comparison Of shock efficacy using single-vs. Dual-coil lead systems and Anodal vs. cathodaL polarITY defibrillation in patients undergoing transvenous cardioverter-defibrillator implantation. The MODALITY study.
    Baccillieri MS; Gasparini G; Benacchio L; Zorzi A; Marras E; Zerbo F; Tomasi L; Vaccari D; Pastore G; Bonanno C; Molon G; Zanotto G; Fusco A; Carasi M; Zorzi A; Calzolari V; Ignatiuk B; Cannas S; Vaglio A; Al Bunni M; Pedrini A; Olivieri A; Rampazzo R; Minicuci N; Corrado D; Verlato R
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2015 Jun; 43(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 25690336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Energy, current, and success in defibrillation and cardioversion: clinical studies using an automated impedance-based method of energy adjustment.
    Kerber RE; Martins JB; Kienzle MG; Constantin L; Olshansky B; Hopson R; Charbonnier F
    Circulation; 1988 May; 77(5):1038-46. PubMed ID: 3359585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intraoperative comparison of a subthreshold test pulse with the standard high-energy shock approach for the measurement of defibrillation lead impedance.
    Schuchert A; Winter J; Binner L; Kühl M; Meinertz T;
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2006 Jan; 17(1):56-9. PubMed ID: 16426402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Advance prediction of transthoracic impedance in human defibrillation and cardioversion: importance of impedance in determining the success of low-energy shocks.
    Kerber RE; Kouba C; Martins J; Kelly K; Low R; Hoyt R; Ferguson D; Bailey L; Bennett P; Charbonnier F
    Circulation; 1984 Aug; 70(2):303-8. PubMed ID: 6733884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical efficacy of dual electrode systems for endocardial cardioversion of ventricular tachycardia: a prospective randomized crossover trial.
    Saksena S; An H
    Am Heart J; 1990 Jan; 119(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 2404386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy in paediatric practice: a single-centre UK experience with focus on subcutaneous defibrillation.
    Griksaitis MJ; Rosengarten JA; Gnanapragasam JP; Haw MP; Morgan JM
    Europace; 2013 Apr; 15(4):523-30. PubMed ID: 23333943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical shock tolerability and effect of different right atrial electrode locations on efficacy of low energy human transvenous atrial defibrillation using an implantable lead system.
    Lok NS; Lau CP; Tse HF; Ayers GM
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1997 Nov; 30(5):1324-30. PubMed ID: 9350935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Chronic rise in defibrillation threshold with a hybrid lead system.
    Tummala RV; Riggio DR; Peters RW; Shorofsky SR; Gold MR
    Am J Cardiol; 1996 Aug; 78(3):309-12. PubMed ID: 8759810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transvenous internal cardioversion for atrial fibrillation: a randomized comparison between catheters with different coil length.
    Boriani G; Biffi M; Camanini C; Sammali A; Bacchi L; Accorti P; Luceri R; Zannoli R; Branzi A
    Am Heart J; 2002 Nov; 144(5):851-7. PubMed ID: 12422155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biphasic waveforms prevent the chronic rise of defibrillation thresholds with a transvenous lead system.
    Gold MR; Kavesh NG; Peters RW; Shorofsky SR
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1997 Jul; 30(1):233-6. PubMed ID: 9207647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of shock polarity on ventricular defibrillation threshold using a transvenous lead system.
    Strickberger SA; Hummel JD; Horwood LE; Jentzer J; Daoud E; Niebauer M; Bakr O; Man KC; Williamson BD; Kou W
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1994 Oct; 24(4):1069-72. PubMed ID: 7930199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Atrial defibrillation with a transvenous lead: a randomized comparison of active can shocking pathways.
    Cooklin M; Olsovsky MR; Brockman RG; Shorofsky SR; Gold MR
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1999 Aug; 34(2):358-62. PubMed ID: 10440146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of voltage and respiration on impedance in nonthoracotomy defibrillation pathways.
    Swerdlow CD; Kass RM; Hwang C; Gang E; Chen PS; Peter CT
    Am J Cardiol; 1994 Apr; 73(9):688-92. PubMed ID: 8166066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of polarity reversal on defibrillation success with biphasic shocks and a transvenous/subcutaneous defibrillator system in a porcine animal model.
    Stellbrink C; Schauerte P; Loeser H; Rosenbaum C; Kuckertz E; Vogel M; Messmer BJ; Hanrath P; Schoendube FA
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Jul; 21(7):1435-41. PubMed ID: 9670188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.