These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. A minimally invasive vasectomy with the no suture, inline method for vas occlusion. Marmar JL; Kessler S; Hartanto VH Int J Fertil Womens Med; 2001; 46(5):257-64. PubMed ID: 11720198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Vasectomy occlusion technique combining thermal cautery and fascial interposition. Labrecque M Int Braz J Urol; 2011; 37(5):630-5. PubMed ID: 22099275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effectiveness and complications associated with 2 vasectomy occlusion techniques. Labrecque M; Nazerali H; Mondor M; Fortin V; Nasution M J Urol; 2002 Dec; 168(6):2495-8; discussion 2498. PubMed ID: 12441948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Recent research on vasectomy techniques. Sokal DC Asian J Androl; 2003 Sep; 5(3):227-30. PubMed ID: 12937807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Noninvasive vasectomy using a focused ultrasound clip: thermal measurements and simulations. Fried NM; Sinelnikov YD; Pant BB; Roberts WW; Solomon SB IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2001 Dec; 48(12):1453-9. PubMed ID: 11759926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sites of residual spermatozoa after irrigation of the distal vas deferens using normal saline solution during vasectomy in a rat model. Sukapiriya C; Chanpalakorn N; Chalermsanyakorn P; Leungwattanakij S Int J Androl; 2005 Aug; 28(4):230-3. PubMed ID: 16048635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. High intensity focused ultrasound ablation of the vas deferens in a canine model. Roberts WW; Chan DY; Fried NM; Wright EJ; Nicol T; Jarrett TW; Kavoussi LR; Solomon SB J Urol; 2002 Jun; 167(6):2613-7. PubMed ID: 11992096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Recent developments in vasectomy. Aradhya KW; Best K; Sokal DC BMJ; 2005 Feb; 330(7486):296-9. PubMed ID: 15695277 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Standard incision or no-scalpel vasectomy? Alderman PM; Morrison GE J Fam Pract; 1999 Sep; 48(9):719-21. PubMed ID: 10498079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does the type of suture material used for ligation of the vas deferens affect vasectomy success? Kotwal S; Sundaram SK; Rangaiah CS; Agrawal V; Browning AJ Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2008 Mar; 13(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 18283599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sutureless vasectomy, an improved technique: 1300 cases performed without failure. Moss WM Fertil Steril; 1976 Sep; 27(9):1040-5. PubMed ID: 964395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effectiveness of vasectomy techniques. Sokal DC; Labrecque M Urol Clin North Am; 2009 Aug; 36(3):317-29. PubMed ID: 19643234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Morphological changes of spermatozoa in proximal vas deferens after vasectomy. Wen RQ; Li SQ; Wang CX; Wang QH; Liu MY Asian J Androl; 1999 Jun; 1(1-2):61-5. PubMed ID: 11225906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative analysis of effectiveness of two local anesthetic techniques in men undergoing no-scalpel vasectomy. White MA; Maatman TJ Urology; 2007 Dec; 70(6):1187-9. PubMed ID: 18158044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Vas deferens, a site of male contraception: an overview. Lohiya NK; Manivannan B; Mishra PK; Pathak N Asian J Androl; 2001 Jun; 3(2):87-95. PubMed ID: 11404791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]