These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9873923)

  • 21. Focused shape models for hip joint segmentation in 3D magnetic resonance images.
    Chandra SS; Xia Y; Engstrom C; Crozier S; Schwarz R; Fripp J
    Med Image Anal; 2014 Apr; 18(3):567-78. PubMed ID: 24614321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Spatial anatomic knowledge for 2-D interactive medical image segmentation and matching.
    Brinkley JF
    Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care; 1991; ():460-4. PubMed ID: 1807643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Tomographic reconstruction using 3D deformable models.
    Battle XL; Cunningham GS; Hanson KM
    Phys Med Biol; 1998 Apr; 43(4):983-90. PubMed ID: 9572521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. ELPHA: Dynamically deformable liver phantom for real-time motion-adaptive radiotherapy treatments.
    Ehrbar S; Jöhl A; Kühni M; Meboldt M; Ozkan Elsen E; Tanner C; Goksel O; Klöck S; Unkelbach J; Guckenberger M; Tanadini-Lang S
    Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):839-850. PubMed ID: 30588635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Deformable segmentation via sparse representation and dictionary learning.
    Zhang S; Zhan Y; Metaxas DN
    Med Image Anal; 2012 Oct; 16(7):1385-96. PubMed ID: 22959839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Expert knowledge-guided segmentation system for brain MRI.
    Pitiot A; Delingette H; Thompson PM; Ayache N
    Neuroimage; 2004; 23 Suppl 1():S85-96. PubMed ID: 15501103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Robust brain ROI segmentation by deformation regression and deformable shape model.
    Wu Z; Guo Y; Park SH; Gao Y; Dong P; Lee SW; Shen D
    Med Image Anal; 2018 Jan; 43():198-213. PubMed ID: 29149715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Task-driven image acquisition and reconstruction in cone-beam CT.
    Gang GJ; Stayman JW; Ehtiati T; Siewerdsen JH
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Apr; 60(8):3129-50. PubMed ID: 25803361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Quantitative Analysis Tools and Digital Phantoms for Deformable Image Registration Quality Assurance.
    Kim H; Park SB; Monroe JI; Traughber BJ; Zheng Y; Lo SS; Yao M; Mansur D; Ellis R; Machtay M; Sohn JW
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Aug; 14(4):428-39. PubMed ID: 25336380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A hybrid framework for 3D medical image segmentation.
    Chen T; Metaxas D
    Med Image Anal; 2005 Dec; 9(6):547-65. PubMed ID: 15896997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Method for segmenting medical image based on anatomical model].
    Yang XQ; Li B; Wei SM
    Space Med Med Eng (Beijing); 2005 Feb; 18(1):62-5. PubMed ID: 15852554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Validation of biomechanical deformable image registration in the abdomen, thorax, and pelvis in a commercial radiotherapy treatment planning system.
    Velec M; Moseley JL; Svensson S; Hårdemark B; Jaffray DA; Brock KK
    Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3407-3417. PubMed ID: 28453911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Incremental model-based estimation using geometric constraints.
    Sminchisescu C; Metaxas D; Dickinson S
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2005 May; 27(5):727-38. PubMed ID: 15875794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Auto-segmentation of normal and target structures in head and neck CT images: a feature-driven model-based approach.
    Qazi AA; Pekar V; Kim J; Xie J; Breen SL; Jaffray DA
    Med Phys; 2011 Nov; 38(11):6160-70. PubMed ID: 22047381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of deformable image registration between external beam radiotherapy and HDR brachytherapy for cervical cancer with a 3D-printed deformable pelvis phantom.
    Kadoya N; Miyasaka Y; Nakajima Y; Kuroda Y; Ito K; Chiba M; Sato K; Dobashi S; Yamamoto T; Takahashi N; Kubozono M; Takeda K; Jingu K
    Med Phys; 2017 Apr; 44(4):1445-1455. PubMed ID: 28214368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Locally-constrained boundary regression for segmentation of prostate and rectum in the planning CT images.
    Shao Y; Gao Y; Wang Q; Yang X; Shen D
    Med Image Anal; 2015 Dec; 26(1):345-56. PubMed ID: 26439938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Segmentation of Pathological Structures by Landmark-Assisted Deformable Models.
    Ibragimov B; Korez R; Likar B; Pernus F; Xing L; Vrtovec T
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2017 Jul; 36(7):1457-1469. PubMed ID: 28207388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Personalized X-ray 3-D reconstruction of the scoliotic spine from hybrid statistical and image-based models.
    Kadoury S; Cheriet F; Labelle H
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Sep; 28(9):1422-35. PubMed ID: 19336299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Statistical shape model-based reconstruction of a scaled, patient-specific surface model of the pelvis from a single standard AP x-ray radiograph.
    Zheng G
    Med Phys; 2010 Apr; 37(4):1424-39. PubMed ID: 20443464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Tracking geometrical descriptors on 3-D deformable surfaces: application to the left-ventricular surface of the heart.
    Clarysse P; Friboulet D; Magnin IE
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1997 Aug; 16(4):392-404. PubMed ID: 9262997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.