These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9874946)
1. When pregnant women and their physicians disagree on the need for cesarean section: no simple solution. Catlin AJ Adv Pract Nurs Q; 1998; 4(2):23-9. PubMed ID: 9874946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Court-ordered cesarean sections: an example of the dangers of judicial involvement in medical decision making. Stanyer BT Gonzaga Law Rev; 1992-1993; 28(1):121-40. PubMed ID: 11654037 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Patient refusal of emergency cesarean delivery: a study of obstetricians' attitudes in Europe. Cuttini M; Habiba M; Nilstun T; Donfrancesco S; Garel M; Arnaud C; Bleker O; Da Frè M; Gomez MM; Heyl W; Marsal K; Saracci R; Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Nov; 108(5):1121-9. PubMed ID: 17077233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Compelled cesarean section. An ethical perspective. Doukas DJ; Elkins TE Prim Care; 1993 Sep; 20(3):721-8. PubMed ID: 8378462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Foreclosing the use of force: A.C. reversed. Annas GJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(4):27-9. PubMed ID: 2211083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can cesarean section be performed without the woman's consent? Lyng K; Syse A; Børdahl PE Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Jan; 84(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 15603565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Counselling women about choice. Harris LH Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2001 Feb; 15(1):93-107. PubMed ID: 11359317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. High Court endorses women's right to refuse treatment. Pract Midwife; 1998 Jun; 1(6):7. PubMed ID: 9735814 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. When pregnant patients refuse interventions. Tauer CA AWHONNS Clin Issues Perinat Womens Health Nurs; 1993; 4(4):596-605. PubMed ID: 8220374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Making choices for childbirth: a randomized controlled trial of a decision-aid for informed birth after cesarean. Shorten A; Shorten B; Keogh J; West S; Morris J Birth; 2005 Dec; 32(4):252-61. PubMed ID: 16336366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Forced medical treatment in pregnancy: resolving the conflicting rights of mother and fetus. Meyer KC Med Staff Couns; 1990; 4(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 10104769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The rebirth of informed consent: a cultural analysis of the Informed Consent Doctrine after Schreiber v. Physicians Insurance Co. of Wisconsin. Ketler SK Northwest Univ Law Rev; 2001; 95(3):1029-56. PubMed ID: 12778922 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A comprehensive primer of surgical informed consent. Jones JW; McCullough LB; Richman BW Surg Clin North Am; 2007 Aug; 87(4):903-18, viii. PubMed ID: 17888788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Obstetricians, health attorneys, and court-ordered cesarean sections. Samuels TA; Minkoff H; Feldman J; Awonuga A; Wilson TE Womens Health Issues; 2007; 17(2):107-14. PubMed ID: 17403468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Autonomy, consent, and the conflict of rights in health care. Procaccino JA Air Force Law Rev; 1990; 33():183-91. PubMed ID: 15991412 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The ethics of cesarean section by choice. Minkoff H Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):309-12. PubMed ID: 17011404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]