BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9879218)

  • 1. A radiographic method for measuring radiation dose based on beam quality.
    Syriopoulos K; Velders XL; Geraets WG; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Sep; 27(5):287-92. PubMed ID: 9879218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mail survey of dental radiographic techniques and radiation doses in Greece.
    Syriopoulos K; Velders XL; van der Stelt PF; van Ginkel FC; Tsiklakis K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Nov; 27(6):321-8. PubMed ID: 10895629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiation dosage reduction in general dental practice using digital intraoral radiographic systems.
    Hayakawa Y; Shibuya H; Ota Y; Kuroyanagi K
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1997 Feb; 38(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 9566150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sensitometric evaluation of a new E-speed dental radiographic film.
    Price C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Feb; 24(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 8593905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Kilovoltage peak and half value layer relationships of a dental X-ray machine.
    Patel JR
    Indian J Dent Res; 1992; 3(2):31-5. PubMed ID: 1343955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of contrast equalization on energy imparted to the patient: a comparison of two dental generators and two types of intraoral film.
    Helmrot E; Carlsson GA; Eckerdal O
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 May; 23(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 7835508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Niobium filtration of conventional and high-frequency x-ray generator beams for intraoral radiography. Effects on absorbed doses, image density and contrast, and photon spectra.
    Tetradis S; Scaf G; Lurie AG; Freedman ML
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Aug; 80(2):232-41. PubMed ID: 7552890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of a new F speed dental X-ray film. The effect of processing solutions and a comparison with D and E speed films.
    Farman TT; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 10654035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patient radiation dose management in dental facilities according to the X-ray focal distance and the image receptor type.
    Gonzalez L; Moro J
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Jul; 36(5):282-4. PubMed ID: 17586855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dosimetry intercomparison using a 35-keV X-ray synchrotron beam.
    Oves SD; Hogstrom KR; Ham K; Sajo E; Dugas JP
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3 Suppl):S121-5. PubMed ID: 18586431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Densitometric evaluation of intraoral x-ray films: Ektaspeed versus Ultraspeed.
    Kaffe I; Littner MM; Kuspet ME
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Mar; 57(3):338-42. PubMed ID: 6584823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of thin K-edge filters on the image quality of D- and E-speed dental film.
    MacDonald-Jankowski DS; Lawinski CP; Payne M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Feb; 24(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 8593903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radiological characteristics of lead foils in dental film packets: analysis of components and shielding effect.
    Araki K; Kanda S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1992 Feb; 21(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 1397446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A radiographic quality control system for the dental office.
    Gould RG; Gratt BM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1982; 11(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 6962153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Improvement of radiation hygiene with Kodak Ektaspeed dental radiographic film].
    Rotgans J
    Quintessenz; 1983 Apr; 34(4):703-10. PubMed ID: 6576411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sensitometric evaluation of four dental X-ray films using five processing solutions.
    Syriopoulos K; Velders XL; Sanderink GC; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Mar; 28(2):73-9. PubMed ID: 10522195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A method for evaluating the entrance surface dose from the measurement of exposure and half value layer in intraoral radiography using a radiophotoluminescent dosemeter.
    Katoh T; Sasaki T; Iwai K; Okano T; Satoh K; Shimano T; Hayami A; Wada S; Juto N
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 103(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 12596989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The characteristics of dental X-ray fluoroscopic equipment 'DreamRay 60F'.
    Shin GS; Lee BR; Chang KH; Lee IJ; Lee W; Choi JH; Kim YH
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Aug; 140(4):362-8. PubMed ID: 20554581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Psychophysical properties of a new F-speed intraoral film.
    Mastoris M; Yoshiura K; Welander U; Tsiklakis K; Papadakis E; Li G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 May; 33(3):158-63. PubMed ID: 15371315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Update on the biological effects of ionizing radiation, relative dose factors and radiation hygiene.
    White SC; Mallya SM
    Aust Dent J; 2012 Mar; 57 Suppl 1():2-8. PubMed ID: 22376091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.