These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9879218)

  • 21. Techniques for measurement of dose width product in panoramic dental radiography.
    Doyle P; Martin CJ; Robertson J
    Br J Radiol; 2006 Feb; 79(938):142-7. PubMed ID: 16489195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Radiographic trends of dental offices and dental schools.
    Suleiman OH; Spelic DC; Conway B; Hart JC; Boyce PR; Antonsen RG
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Jul; 130(7):1104-10. PubMed ID: 10422407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Quality control and diagnostic reference levels in intraoral dental radiographic facilities.
    Hatziioannou K; Psarouli E; Papanastassiou E; Bousbouras P; Kodona H; Kimoundri O; Delichas M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 Sep; 34(5):304-7. PubMed ID: 16120881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Influence of scattered radiation and tube potential on radiographic contrast: comparison of two different dental X-ray films.
    Helmrot E; Carlsson GA; Eckerdal O; Sandborg M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 Aug; 20(3):135-46. PubMed ID: 1807997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Quality control and patient dosimetry in dental cone beam CT.
    Vassileva J; Stoyanov D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):310-2. PubMed ID: 20457665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Survey of dental radiological practice in Turkey.
    Ilgüy D; Ilgüy M; Dinçer S; Bayirli G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 Jul; 34(4):222-7. PubMed ID: 15961596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Impact of rare earth element added filters on the X-ray beam spectra: a Monte Carlo approach.
    Eskandarlou A; Jafari AA; Mohammadi M; Zehtabian M; Faghihi R; Shokri A; Pourolajal J
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2014; 22(4):459-70. PubMed ID: 25080114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Constancy check of beam quality in conventional diagnostic X-ray equipment.
    Costa AM; Badin RS; Leite MS; Caldas LV
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Oct; 66(10):1403-5. PubMed ID: 18434171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Objective and subjective assessments of Kodak Ektaspeed plus new dental X-ray film: a comparison with other conventional X-ray films.
    Kitagawa H; Farman AG; Wakoh M; Nishikawa K; Kuroyanagi K
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1995 May; 36(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 8689744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A survey of all dental x-ray machines in British Columbia using TLD chips 1981-83.
    Morley DR; Greene MW; McConchie JM; Gray AS
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1985 Sep; 51(9):683-7. PubMed ID: 3902173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A study of the effects of lead foil in dental X-ray film packets on radiographic image quality.
    Araki K; Kanda S; Toyofuku F
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Nov; 22(4):179-82. PubMed ID: 8181643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Variations in film exposure, effective kVp, and HVL among thirty-five dental x-ray units.
    Preece JW; Jensen CW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1983 Dec; 56(6):655-61. PubMed ID: 6581465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of five methods for the derivation of spectra for a constant potential dental X-ray unit.
    Lankipalli BR; McDavid WD; Dove SB; Wieckowska E; Waggener RG; Mercier JR
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Sep; 30(5):264-9. PubMed ID: 11571546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Absorbed dose in AgBr in direct film for photon energies ( < 150 keV): relation to optical density. Theoretical calculation and experimental evaluation.
    Helmrot E; Alm Carlsson G
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1996; 402():1-50. PubMed ID: 8677807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Attitude of the Belgian dentist population towards radiation protection.
    Jacobs R; Vanderstappen M; Bogaerts R; Gijbels F
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Sep; 33(5):334-9. PubMed ID: 15585812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Questionnaire survey on the use of dental X-ray film and equipment among general practitioners in the Swedish Public Dental Health Service.
    Svenson B; Petersson A
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1995 Aug; 53(4):230-5. PubMed ID: 7484105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Compliance of Michigan dentists with radiographic safety recommendations.
    Nakfoor CA; Brooks SL
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1992 Apr; 73(4):510-3. PubMed ID: 1574315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Developing solutions for dental X-ray processors.
    Hedin M
    Swed Dent J; 1989; 13(6):261-5. PubMed ID: 2603130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Simple daily radiology quality control in private practice.
    Serman N; Singer S
    Dent Today; 2000 Aug; 19(8):66-9. PubMed ID: 12524747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Optical densities of dental resin composites: a comparison of CCD, storage phosphor, and Ektaspeed plus radiographic film.
    Farman TT; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Goldsmith LJ
    Gen Dent; 1996; 44(6):532-7. PubMed ID: 9515395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.